The design and implementation of product development process models in construction companies

The need for improving the product development process within the construction industry is widely acknowledged. In response to this challenge, different process models have been developed by academia and industry to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the design and construction activity. However, the effective and widespread adoption and use of product development process models in practice has been limited, and the benefits resulting from these endeavours have been ambiguous at best and non-existent at worst. This led to the research need for better understanding of the dynamics of implementing product development process models in construction firms. Such understanding includes identifying strategies to allow the process model adaptation and adoption into specific project environments, as well as examining factors that affect implementation. To develop such understanding the process management, organisational change and technology transfer literature have been revised and synthesised. The research methodology employed a case study approach to test research hypotheses and, in doing so, create new theoretical insights. Different research techniques were applied, including literature review and synthesis, interviews, observation, content analysis and cognitive mapping. As a result, a better understanding of implementation in real life settings was achieved through a detailed discussion of implementation cases. This research has produced a theoretical framework to evaluate the content of product development process models with a view to its implementation and a typology for factors affecting implementation. The key research findings are: the need to consider the design and implementation of process models in an integrated fashion within the organisational context in which it takes place; and, a shift in the role of product development process models within firms from a rational 'planning and control perspective' to a softer 'learning' approach.

[1]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Competing for the Future , 1994 .

[2]  David Silverman,et al.  Qualitative research: meanings or practices? , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[3]  John Kamara A comparison of new product introduction in the construction and manufacturing industries: implications for implementing concurrent engineering , 1999 .

[4]  Helen Mill,et al.  Implementing a New Design Process , 1994 .

[5]  David Gann,et al.  Construction as a manufacturing process? Similarities and differences between industrialized housing and car production in Japan , 1996 .

[6]  Farzaneh Fazel,et al.  An integrative approach for selecting a TQM/BPR implementation plan , 1996 .

[7]  Maria Mårtensson,et al.  A critical review of knowledge management as a management tool , 2000, J. Knowl. Manag..

[8]  Ghassan Aouad,et al.  Rethinking construction: the Generic Design and Construction Process Protocol , 2000 .

[9]  Gavin Tunstall Managing the Building Design Process , 2000 .

[10]  M. Easterby-Smith,et al.  Management Research: An Introduction , 1991 .

[11]  M. Beer,et al.  Why change programs don't produce change. , 1990, Harvard business review.

[12]  Crispin Hales,et al.  Managing Engineering Design , 1994 .

[13]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[14]  Graham Winch,et al.  Managing Construction Projects: An Information Processing Approach , 2002 .

[15]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: four cases in the microcomputer industry , 1988 .

[16]  Ghassan Aouad,et al.  An IT Map for a generic design and construction process protocol , 1998 .

[17]  A. Levy Second-order planned change: Definition and conceptualization , 1986 .

[18]  Michael Hammer,et al.  The Reengineering Revolution - the Handbook , 1995 .

[19]  B. Burnes Managing Change: A Strategic Approach to Organisational Dynamics , 2001 .

[20]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design , 1994 .

[21]  J. Peppard,et al.  The Essence of Business Process Re-Engineering , 1995 .

[22]  Mike Bresnen,et al.  Understanding the diffusion and application of new management ideas in construction , 2001 .

[23]  Graham Winch,et al.  Models of manufacturing and the construction process: the genesis of re-engineering construction , 2003 .

[24]  Herman Glenn Ballard,et al.  THE LAST PLANNER SYSTEM OF PRODUCTION CONTROL , 2000 .

[25]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  principles in design , 1990 .

[26]  Paulien M. Herder,et al.  Follow the rainbow: a knowledge management framework for new product introduction , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[27]  Donald A. Schön Knowing-In-Action: The New Scholarship Requires a New Epistemology , 1995 .

[28]  C. Lackman,et al.  Organizational learning: a critical component to new product development , 2000 .

[29]  Frank-Steffen Walliser,et al.  Best practice in reengineering: a successful example of the Porsche research and development center , 1998, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[30]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[31]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[32]  John Peters,et al.  Looking for good research in management – a publisher’s case study , 2001 .

[33]  Francis Stickland,et al.  The Dynamics of Change: Insights into Organisational Transition from the Natural World , 1998 .

[34]  M. Alvesson Beyond Neopositivists, Romantics, and Localists: A Reflexive Approach to Interviews in Organizational Research , 2003 .

[35]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Alternative paradigms for manufacturing strategy , 1995 .

[36]  Graham Winch,et al.  Processes, maps and protocols: Understanding the shape of the construction process , 2001 .

[37]  Andrew N. Baldwin,et al.  Analytical design planning technique: a model of the detailed building design process , 1999 .

[38]  Christopher Holmes,et al.  Four Models of Design Definition: Sequential, Design Centered, Concurrent and Dynamic , 1999 .

[39]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Towards Lean Design Management , 1997 .

[40]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[41]  Winco K.C. Yung,et al.  A stepped composite methodology to redesign manufacturing processes through re‐engineering and benchmarking , 1997 .

[42]  A. Pettigrew Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm , 1987 .

[43]  Simon A. Austin,et al.  Mapping the conceptual design activity of interdisciplinary teams , 2001 .

[44]  B. Williams,et al.  Operations management. , 2001, Optometry.

[45]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Of strategies, deliberate and emergent , 1985, Strategic Management Journal.

[46]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[47]  J. Fairclough,et al.  RETHINKING CONSTRUCTION INNOVATION AND RESEARCH - A REVIEW OF THE GOVERNMENT'S R&D POLICIES AND PRACTICES , 2002 .

[48]  R. Cooper Third‐Generation New Product Processes , 1994 .

[49]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  To build or not to build? Assessing the strategic needs of construction industry clients and their stakeholders , 2001 .

[50]  Mary Bradley,et al.  Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know , 2000 .

[51]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction , 2000 .

[52]  Steve Clarke,et al.  A critique of BPR from a holistic perspective , 2001, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[53]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Winning at new products : accelerating the process from idea to launch , 2001 .

[54]  Renata Liedtke,et al.  A model for managing the product development process in house building , 2002 .

[55]  Robert G.Burgess Field Research: A Sourcebook and Field Manual , 1986 .

[56]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation , 2002 .

[57]  Roger E. Bohn,et al.  Chapter 17 – Measuring and Managing Technological Knowledge , 1998 .

[58]  Ghassan Aouad,et al.  IT and the design and construction process: a conceptual model of co-maturation , 1997 .

[59]  Peter Barrett,et al.  Better Construction Briefing , 1999 .

[60]  Edward Toomer,et al.  Qualitative Methods in Management Research , 1989 .

[61]  O. Holsti Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities , 1969 .

[62]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[63]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution , 1995 .

[64]  Jiati Deng,et al.  A Concurrent Workflow Management Process for Integrated Product Development , 1998 .

[65]  Preston G. Smith,et al.  Developing products in half the time , 1995 .

[66]  Tim Cornick Quality management for building design , 1991 .

[67]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Determining the causal structure of rework influences in construction , 1999 .

[68]  Andrew N. Baldwin,et al.  Analytical design planning technique (ADePT): a dependency structure matrix tool to schedule the building design process , 2000 .

[69]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[70]  Nancy M. Dixon,et al.  Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know , 2000 .

[71]  Jussi T. S. Heikkilä,et al.  Successful Re-engineering—Learning by Doing , 2001 .

[72]  Stephen A. R. Scrivener,et al.  The rich picture of design activity , 1998 .

[73]  A. Pettigrew Contextualist Research and the Study of Organizational Change Processes , 1985 .

[74]  Alan Bryman,et al.  Research Methods and Organization Studies , 1989 .

[75]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Research methods in information systems , 1985 .

[76]  J. Rooke,et al.  The role of theory in construction management: a call for debate , 1997 .

[77]  Alan Fowler Operations management and systemic modelling as frameworks for BPR , 1998 .

[78]  Stuart Pugh,et al.  Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering , 1991 .

[79]  Andrew N. Baldwin,et al.  Manipulating the flow of design information to improve the programming of building design , 1994 .

[80]  H. Bussell Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research: A Practical Guide , 2000 .

[81]  Rachel Cooper,et al.  The Design Agenda: A Guide to Successful Design Management , 1995 .

[82]  K. Eisenhardt Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic , 1991 .

[83]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  Learning-before-doing in the development of new process technology , 1996 .

[84]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  Intentions, practices and aspirations: Understanding learning in design , 2003 .

[85]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .

[86]  Neil N. Eldin,et al.  Impact of employee, management, and process issues on constructability implementation , 1999 .

[87]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Technology and Change; the New Heraclitus , 1967 .

[88]  F. Kerlinger Behavioral Research: A Conceptual Approach , 1978 .

[89]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[90]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[91]  Mohamed Zairi,et al.  Quality function deployment , 1995 .

[92]  Stuart Smith,et al.  Teamworked organisational engineering: getting the most out of teamworking , 1998 .

[93]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Product Leadership: Creating And Launching Superior New Products , 1998 .

[94]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Process model for client requirements processing in construction , 2000, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[95]  Donald G. Reinertsen Managing The Design Factory: A Product Developer's Toolkit , 1997 .

[96]  Mariëlle den Hengst,et al.  Collaborative Business Engineering: A Decade of Lessons from the Field , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[97]  Will Hughes,et al.  Building Design Management , 2001 .

[98]  T. Green,et al.  Motivation, Beliefs, and Organizational Transformation , 1999 .

[99]  P. Kuruppuarachchi,et al.  IT project implementation strategies for effective changes: a critical review , 2002 .

[100]  P. Senge THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE , 1997 .

[101]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction , 1992 .

[102]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Multiproject strategy, design transfer, and project performance: a survey of automobile development projects in the US and Japan , 1995 .

[103]  Mike Gregory,et al.  Tacit knowledge, the life cycle and international manufacturing transfer , 1997 .

[104]  Stuart D. Green The missing arguments of lean construction , 1999 .

[105]  N. Blaikie Approaches to Social Enquiry , 1993 .

[106]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  On the Agenda of Design Management Research , 1998 .

[107]  J. Gill,et al.  Research Methods For Managers , 1991 .

[108]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  A typology of project-level technology transfer processes , 2000 .

[109]  Andrew N. Baldwin,et al.  Planning building design by simulating information flow , 1998 .

[110]  Pär Åhlström,et al.  The difficult path to lean product development , 1996 .

[111]  John Bessant,et al.  Rediscovering continuous improvement , 1994 .

[112]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[113]  Tiina Tissari Successful Re-engineering- Learning by Doing , 2001 .

[114]  Frederick Winslow Taylor,et al.  科学管理原理=The principles of scientific management , 2014 .

[115]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Toyota's Principles of Set-Based Concurrent Engineering , 1999 .

[116]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[117]  K. Clark,et al.  Dynamic Manufacturing: Creating the Learning Organization , 1988 .

[118]  David Maffin,et al.  Engineering Design Models: Context, theory and practice , 1998 .

[119]  Marlene Z. Cohen,et al.  Hermeneutic Phenomenological Research: A Practical Guide for Nurse Researchers , 2000 .

[120]  A. D. Jankowicz Business research projects , 1995 .

[121]  Khaleel Malik,et al.  Aiding the technology manager: a conceptual model for intra-firm technology transfer , 2002 .

[122]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology , 1992 .

[123]  G. Lippitt,et al.  Implementing organizational change , 1985 .

[124]  Finland,et al.  Fast or concurrent: The art of getting construction improved , 1997 .

[125]  P. Barrett Facilities Management: Towards Best Practice , 1997 .

[126]  Olivera Marjanovic,et al.  Supporting the "soft" side of business process reengineering , 2000, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[127]  L. Koskela,et al.  Leadership and Project Management: Time for a Shift from Fayol to Flores , 2004 .

[128]  M. Jelinek Managing change for competitive success , 1993 .

[129]  Michael Burda,et al.  Revolutionizing product development , 1993 .

[130]  Zygmunt Bauman,et al.  Hermeneutics and Social Science: Approaches to Understanding , 1992 .

[131]  Karhu FORMAL LANGUAGES FOR CONSTRUCTION PROCESS MODELLING , 2000 .

[132]  K. Lewin Frontiers in Group Dynamics , 1947 .

[133]  H. Maylor Concurrent new product development: an empirical assessment , 1997 .

[134]  Yacine Rezgui,et al.  The Condor business process re‐engineering model , 2000 .

[135]  Tarek M. Hassan,et al.  Emerging clients' needs for Large Scale Engineering projects , 1999 .

[136]  H. Harrington Business process improvement : the breakthrough strategy for total quality, productivity, and competitiveness , 1991 .

[137]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  Replication of Organizational Routines: Conceptualizing the Exploitation of Knowledge Assets , 2000 .

[138]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[139]  Brent Work,et al.  Doing research in Business and Management: An Introduction to process and method , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[140]  E. A. Hall,et al.  How to Make Reengineering Really Work , 1994 .

[141]  Gabriel Szulanski The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness , 2000 .