Stabilising system frequency using HVDC between the Continental European, Nordic, and Great Britain systems

For future efficiency improvement of the frequency containment process (primary control) within European power systems, cooperation between (multiple) synchronous areas using their controllable HVDC interconnections is optioned. However, the differences in system size, HVDC interconnection capacity, and the balancing performance per individual system will have its specific system frequency effect for each different balancing cooperation concept. Consequently, without alignment on cooperation, HVDC balancing might lead to disproportional support between systems, to frequency oscillations, reserve unreliability and non-compliancy, and to network constraints. Therefore, this work assesses frequency quality and associated DC power flows for several balancing arrangements, using a developed load-frequency control model with frequency interdependency for coupled power system. For a trilateral balancing cooperation case study, it is found that certain cooperation concepts result in undesired frequency oscillation and poor frequency quality. However, cooperation where especially fast-response services are shared, such as virtual inertia, show improved system frequency performance. For the case where power imbalances are proportionately distributed among the systems, it is concluded that power transfers over HVDC interconnections are limited and additional control optimisation can be performed. Those concepts with aligned central or coordinated control show best results for a future cooperation for balancing between synchronous areas.

[1]  G. Doorman,et al.  The economic impacts of a submarine HVDC interconnection between Norway and Great Britain , 2013 .

[2]  H. Farahmand,et al.  Balancing Market Integration in the Northern European Continent: A 2030 Case Study , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[3]  Madeleine Gibescu,et al.  Sizing and allocation of frequency restoration reserves for LFC Block cooperation , 2015 .

[4]  Gerard Doorman,et al.  Structural imbalances in the Nordic power system — Causes, future expectations and remedies , 2014, 11th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM14).

[5]  Yasunori Mitani,et al.  Modeling Kita-Hon HVDC Link for load frequency control of Eastern Japan 50-Hz power system based on application of the CampusWAMS , 2010, Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[6]  Gerard Doorman,et al.  Assessing the benefits of regulating power market integration in Northern Europe , 2012 .

[7]  Kjetil Uhlen,et al.  Power flow analysis of multi-terminal HVDC networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Trondheim PowerTech.

[8]  S. Sterpu,et al.  Sharing frequency response between asynchronous electrical systems , 2009, 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[9]  W. L. Kling,et al.  Towards a pan-European energy balancing market: Exercise on coupling the United Kingdom and Continental Europe , 2014, 11th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM14).

[10]  J Jasper Frunt,et al.  Analysis of balancing requirements in future sustainable and reliable power systems , 2011 .

[11]  Kjetil Uhlen,et al.  Primary frequency control of remote grids connected by multi-terminal HVDC , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[12]  Andrew J. Roscoe,et al.  Inertia Emulation Control Strategy for VSC-HVDC Transmission Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  S. P. Teeuwsen,et al.  Dynamic performance of the 1000 MW BritNed HVDC interconnector project , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[14]  Leen Vandezande,et al.  DESIGN AND INTEGRATI ON OF BALANCING MARKETS IN EUROPE , 2011 .

[15]  W.L. Kling,et al.  Supplementary control for wind power smoothing , 2010, 45th International Universities Power Engineering Conference UPEC2010.

[16]  P. Kundur,et al.  Power system stability and control , 1994 .

[17]  M. Davies,et al.  Latest control and protection innovations applied to the Basslink HVDC interconnector , 2006 .