Randomized comparison of distal protection versus conventional treatment in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the drug elution and distal protection in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (DEDICATION) trial.
暂无分享,去创建一个
C. Terkelsen | H. Bøtker | A. Kaltoft | L. Køber | K. Kofoed | T. Engstrøm | J. Ravkilde | J. Lassen | L. Thuesen | E. Christiansen | S. Helqvist | P. Clemmensen | H. Kelbaek | L. Krusell | L. Kløvgaard | E. Jørgensen | K. Saunamäki | H. Hansen
[1] J. Drazen,et al. Drug-eluting coronary stents--promise and uncertainty. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.
[2] G. Stone,et al. Adjunctive mechanical devices to prevent distal embolization in patients undergoing mechanical revascularization for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2007, American heart journal.
[3] Patrick Hunziker,et al. Late clinical events after clopidogrel discontinuation may limit the benefit of drug-eluting stents: an observational study of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[4] M. Briel,et al. Mortality in randomized controlled trials comparing drug-eluting vs. bare metal stents in coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. , 2006, European heart journal.
[5] J. Tijssen,et al. Paclitaxel-eluting versus uncoated stents in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.
[6] E. Bramucci,et al. Sirolimus-eluting versus uncoated stents in acute myocardial infarction. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.
[7] D. Berman,et al. Rheolytic thrombectomy with percutaneous coronary intervention for infarct size reduction in acute myocardial infarction: 30-day results from a multicenter randomized study. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[8] C. Terkelsen,et al. Routine Thrombectomy in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2006, Circulation.
[9] C. Terkelsen,et al. Potential significance of spontaneous and interventional ST-changes in patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: observations from the ST-MONitoring in Acute Myocardial Infarction study (The MONAMI study). , 2006, European heart journal.
[10] F. Neumann,et al. Randomized Evaluation of the Effects of Filter-Based Distal Protection on Myocardial Perfusion and Infarct Size After Primary Percutaneous Catheter Intervention in Myocardial Infarction With and Without ST-Segment Elevation , 2005, Circulation.
[11] J. Ottervanger,et al. Unsuccessful reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty. , 2005, American heart journal.
[12] C. Di Mario,et al. X-sizer for thrombectomy in acute myocardial infarction improves ST-segment resolution: results of the X-sizer in AMI for negligible embolization and optimal ST resolution (X AMINE ST) trial. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[13] E. Romagnoli,et al. Manual thrombus-aspiration improves myocardial reperfusion: the randomized evaluation of the effect of mechanical reduction of distal embolization by thrombus-aspiration in primary and rescue angioplasty (REMEDIA) trial. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[14] R. Gibbons,et al. Distal microcirculatory protection during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, JAMA.
[15] A. Kastrati,et al. Distal embolic protection in patients with acute myocardial infarction: attractive concept but no evidence of benefit. , 2005, JAMA.
[16] R. Gibbons,et al. Distal Microcirculatory Protection During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2005 .
[17] B. Brodie,et al. Relation between electrocardiographic ST-segment resolution and early and late outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.
[18] M. Josephson,et al. Prognostic utility of comparative methods for assessment of ST-segment resolution after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) trial. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[19] Albert Schömig,et al. Coronary and myocardial angiography: angiographic assessment of both epicardial and myocardial perfusion. , 2004, Circulation.
[20] G. Parodi,et al. Comparison of rheolytic thrombectomy before direct infarct artery stenting versus direct stenting alone in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.
[21] G. Stone,et al. Prospective, randomized evaluation of thrombectomy prior to percutaneous intervention in diseased saphenous vein grafts and thrombus-containing coronary arteries. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[22] Klaus Rasmussen,et al. A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.
[23] G. Stone,et al. Randomized Comparison of Distal Protection With a Filter-Based Catheter and a Balloon Occlusion and Aspiration System During Percutaneous Intervention of Diseased Saphenous Vein Aorto-Coronary Bypass Grafts , 2003, Circulation.
[24] G. Fontanini,et al. Mechanical Prevention of Distal Embolization During Primary Angioplasty: Safety, Feasibility, and Impact on Myocardial Reperfusion , 2003, Circulation.
[25] J. Boura,et al. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials , 2003, The Lancet.
[26] S. Nekolla,et al. Myocardial salvage after coronary stenting plus abciximab versus fibrinolysis plus abciximab in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial. , 2002, Lancet.
[27] J. Ottervanger,et al. Incidence and clinical significance of distal embolization during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. , 2002, European heart journal.
[28] J. J. Griffin,et al. Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.
[29] J. Reiber,et al. Standardization of Central Off-Line Quantitative Image Analysis: Implications from Experiences with Quantitative Coronary Angiography , 2000, Heart Drug.
[30] J. Ottervanger,et al. Long-term benefit of primary angioplasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.
[31] L. Køber,et al. An echocardiographic method for selecting high risk patients shortly after acute myocardial infarction, for inclusion in multi-centre studies (as used in the TRACE study). TRAndolapril Cardiac Evaluation. , 1994, European heart journal.
[32] P. Colombo,et al. CLINICAL RESEARCH Interventional Cardiology Thrombus Aspiration Before Primary Angioplasty Improves Myocardial Reperfusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction The DEAR-MI (Dethrombosis to Enhance Acute Reperfusion in Myocardial Infarction) Study , 2006 .
[33] H. S. Mueller,et al. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.