Supplementary Cementitious Materials in Building Blocks—Diagnosing Opportunities in Sub-Saharan Africa

Sustainable building should at least be affordable and carbon neutral. Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is a region struggling with housing affordability. Residential buildings are often constructed using block-based materials. These are increasingly produced using ordinary Portland cement (PC), which has a high carbon footprint. Using alternative Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs) for block production might reduce the footprint and price. The purpose is to assess the level of information for SCM use in blocks in SSA and to use this information for Diagnosing the improvement potential as part of an Opportunity Study. Results from the scoping review show that aggregated information on SCMs and the quantities available is limited. Diagnosing the theoretical improvement potential in using cassava peel ash, rice husk ash, corn cob ash, volcanic ash and calcined clays, indicates that SCMs could represent a yearly value of approximately USD 400 million, which could be transferred from buying cement to local production. The use of SCMs could save 1.7 million tonnes of CO2 per year and create some 50,000 jobs. About 5% of the PC used for block production could be substituted, indicating that, in addition to using SCMs, other solutions are needed to secure production of sustainable blocks.

[1]  Bin Wang,et al.  Properties and occurrence of clay resources for use as supplementary cementitious materials: a paper of RILEM TC 282-CCL , 2022, Materials and Structures.

[2]  Jamal A. Abdalla,et al.  Biomass ashes from agricultural wastes as supplementary cementitious materials or aggregate replacement in cement/geopolymer concrete: A comprehensive review , 2021 .

[3]  Alison J. Cotgrave,et al.  Utilisation of nut shell wastes in brick, mortar and concrete: A review , 2021, Construction and Building Materials.

[4]  I. E. Davies,et al.  High volume Portland cement replacement: A review , 2020, Construction and Building Materials.

[5]  T. Kränkel,et al.  Performance of Rice Husk Ash as Supplementary Cementitious Material after Production in the Field and in the Lab , 2020, Materials.

[6]  A. Raheem,et al.  Incorporation of agricultural residues as partial substitution for cement in concrete and mortar – A review , 2020 .

[7]  S. Nizamuddin,et al.  Waste materials for wastewater treatment and waste adsorbents for biofuel and cement supplement applications: A critical review , 2020 .

[8]  P. L. Carlos Ignacio,et al.  A Comparative Study of Concrete Hollow Blocks with and Without Rice Husk Powder as Partial Replacement to Cement , 2020, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[9]  Raine Isaksson,et al.  Opportunities for improved sustainability in house building: The case of Dar es Salaam , 2019 .

[10]  H. Kühne,et al.  Rice husk ash as a sustainable supplementary cementitious material for improved concrete properties , 2019, African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development.

[11]  B. Šavija,et al.  Agricultural Solid Waste as Source of Supplementary Cementitious Materials in Developing Countries , 2019, Materials.

[12]  Samir Bhatt,et al.  Mapping changes in housing in sub-Saharan Africa from 2000 to 2015 , 2019, Nature.

[13]  K. Scrivener,et al.  Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry , 2018, Cement and Concrete Research.

[14]  Y. D. Amartey,et al.  Optimization Model for Compressive Strength of Sandcrete Blocks Using Cassava Peel Ash (CPA) Blended Cement Mortar as Binder , 2018, Kathmandu University Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology.

[15]  Marangu J. Mwiti,et al.  Properties of activated blended cement containing high content of calcined clay , 2018, Heliyon.

[16]  A. Raheem,et al.  Application of Saw Dust Ash as Partial Replacement for Cement in the Production of Interlocking Paving Stones , 2017 .

[17]  A. Raheem,et al.  Application of Corn Stalk Ash as Partial Replacement for Cement in the Production of Interlocking Paving Stones , 2017 .

[18]  S. EviAprianti,et al.  A huge number of artificial waste material can be supplementary cementitious material (SCM) for concrete production – a review part II , 2017 .

[19]  Sanjaya Kumar Patro,et al.  Concrete using agro-waste as fine aggregate for sustainable built environment – A review , 2016 .

[20]  Raine Isaksson.  Process based system models for detecting opportunities and threats – the case of World Cement Production , 2016 .

[21]  Christopher C. Ferraro,et al.  A review of waste products utilized as supplements to Portland cement in concrete , 2016 .

[22]  Mohd Zamin Jumaat,et al.  Green concrete partially comprised of farming waste residues: a review , 2016 .

[23]  Raine Isaksson,et al.  Making sense of opportunities in building material production , 2015 .

[24]  D. Parker,et al.  Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews , 2015, International journal of evidence-based healthcare.

[25]  Syamsul Bahri,et al.  Supplementary cementitious materials origin from agricultural wastes - A review , 2015 .

[26]  Mohd Zamin Jumaat,et al.  Agricultural wastes as aggregate in concrete mixtures – A review , 2014 .

[27]  B. Lothenbach,et al.  Supplementary cementitious materials , 2011 .

[28]  G. Ekosse,et al.  Kaolin deposits and occurrences in Africa: Geology, mineralogy and utilization , 2010 .

[29]  A. Booth,et al.  A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. , 2009, Health information and libraries journal.

[30]  R. Adesanya,et al.  Ethanol Production By Saccharomyces Cerevisiae From Cassava Peel Hydrolysate , 2007, The Internet Journal of Microbiology.

[31]  A.L.A. Fraaij,et al.  Reactive pozzolanas from rice husk ash: An alternative to cement for rural housing , 2006 .

[32]  H. Arksey,et al.  Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework , 2005 .

[33]  J. Bai,et al.  Metakaolin and calcined clays as pozzolans for concrete: a review , 2001 .

[34]  N. Delatte.  Lessons from Roman Cement and Concrete , 2001 .

[35]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Product Evolution: A Reverse Engineering and Redesign Methodology , 1998 .

[36]  K. Dreborg.  Essence of backcasting , 1996 .

[37]  T. J. Kumator,et al.  Effect of potassium hydroxide and lime on the strength and durability of cassava peel ash blended cement mortar , 2020 .

[38]  K. Scrivener,et al.  Calcined Clays for Sustainable Concrete , 2020, RILEM Bookseries.

[39]  E. Sadiku,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF CORNCOB ASH (CCA) AS A POZZOLANIC MATERIAL , 2018 .

[40]  K. Olonade,et al.  Shrinkage Characteristics of Cassava Peel Ash Concrete , 2017 .

[41]  H. V. Oss.  Reducing cement's CO 2 footprint , 2011 .

[42]  Akeem Ayinde Raheem,et al.  A study of the workability and compressive strength characteristics of corn cob ash blended cement concrete , 2009 .

[43]  Raine Isaksson,et al.  The measurement system resource as support for sustainable change , 2008 .

[44]  A. B. Kampunzu,et al.  Magmatism in Extensional Structural Settings , 1991 .

[45]  A. Makange,et al.  Investigations of natural Pozzolan-Portland cement mortars in Tanzania , 1986 .