An upper echelons perspective on information technology business value

This paper argues that information technology (IT) outcomes are more valuable to companies when their top management team (TMT) moves from flirting with IT to marriage. Previous research has demonstrated an association between top management support (TMS) and IT value. We extend the concept of TMS with the imbrication metaphor to define the construct of TMT-IT imbrication, which allows us to account for a tighter and continuous entwining of the TMT and IT to create IT value. Our definition of the TMT-IT imbrication construct embraces four dimensions: involvement, participation, attention, and use. In addition, with the support of upper echelons (UE) theory, we explore certain managerial traits, competences, and team processes that may be antecedents of this imbrication. As a result, our work provides a variance model and various propositions rooted in the logic of UE that contribute to research on IT business value.

[1]  W. Orlikowski The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research , 2010 .

[2]  Marta A. Geletkanycz The salience of 'culture's consequences' : The effects of cultural values on top executive commitment to the status quo , 1997 .

[3]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[4]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  Upper Echelons Research Revisited: Antecedents, Elements, and Consequences of Top Management Team Composition , 2004 .

[5]  Ernest Jordan,et al.  Top management support: mantra or necessity? , 2008 .

[6]  V. Venkatesh,et al.  AGE DIFFERENCES IN TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION DECISIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR A CHANGING WORK FORCE , 2000 .

[7]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[8]  Jee-Hae Lim,et al.  Impact of Top Management's IT Knowledge and IT Governance Mechanisms on Financial Performance , 2007, ICIS.

[9]  P. Leonardi Materiality, Sociomateriality, and Socio-Technical Systems: What Do These Terms Mean? How are They Related? Do We Need Them? , 2012 .

[10]  Binshan Lin,et al.  Owner/Manager characteristics, organisational characteristics and IT adoption in Small and Medium Enterprises , 2007 .

[11]  S. Finkelstein,et al.  Top Management Team Size, CEO Dominance, and firm Performance: The Moderating Roles of Environmental Turbulence and Discretion , 1993 .

[12]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[13]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[14]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Theorizing Information Technology as a Material Artifact in Information Systems Research , 2012 .

[15]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .

[16]  Terri L. Griffith Technology Features as Triggers for Sensemaking , 1999 .

[17]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[18]  Ari Ginsberg,et al.  Connecting Diversification to Performance: A Sociocognitive Approach , 1990 .

[19]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Management information systems : conceptual foundations, structure, and development , 1985 .

[20]  D. Hambrick,et al.  The seasons of a CEO's tenure. , 1991, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[21]  Albert Boonstra,et al.  How do top managers support strategic information system projects and why do they sometimes withhold this support , 2013 .

[22]  Varun Grover,et al.  Business Value of IT: An Essay on Expanding Research Directions to Keep up with the Times , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[23]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[24]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  A Foundation for the Study of IT Effects: A New Look at DeSanctis and Poole's Concepts of Structural Features and Spirit , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  On studying managerial elites , 1992 .

[26]  Linda Duxbury The corporation of the 1990s: Information technology and organizational transformation , 1993 .

[27]  Martin R. W. Hiebl Upper echelons theory in management accounting and control research , 2014 .

[28]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement , 1974 .

[29]  Princely Ifinedo,et al.  Impacts of business vision, top management support, and external expertise on ERP success , 2008, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[30]  Frans van den Bosch,et al.  Offshoring and firm innovation: The moderating role of top management team attributes , 2012 .

[31]  In-Sue Oh,et al.  Do CEOs Matter to Firm Strategic Actions and Firm Performance? A Meta-Analytic Investigation Based on Upper Echelons Theory , 2016 .

[32]  Alistair Mutch,et al.  Sociomateriality - Taking the wrong turning? , 2013, Inf. Organ..

[33]  Neetu Sharma,et al.  THE NEW LEADERSHIP: MANAGING PARTICIPATION IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2013 .

[34]  Martin R. W. Hiebl,et al.  Chief financial officer (CFO) characteristics and ERP system adoption: An upper-echelons perspective , 2017 .

[35]  S. Jackson,et al.  Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? , 1989 .

[36]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Socio-economic determinants of broadband adoption , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[37]  M. Venkatraman It-enabled business transformation: from automation to business scope redefinition , 1994 .

[38]  R. Solow We’d better watch out , 1987 .

[39]  B. Lawrence The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[40]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[41]  S. Czaja,et al.  Age differences in attitudes toward computers. , 1998, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[42]  Yan Li,et al.  Innovative usage of information technology in Singapore organizations: do CIO characteristics make a difference? , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[43]  Barbara S. Lawrence,et al.  Perspective---The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[44]  Douglas W. Lyon,et al.  Inherent Limitations of Demographic Proxies in Top Management Team Heterogeneity Research , 1999 .

[45]  S. Chown,et al.  A factor analysis of the Wesley Rigidity Inventory: its relationship to age and nonverbal intelligence. , 1960, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[46]  M. Konovsky The New Leadership: Managing Participation in Organizations , 1988 .

[47]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[48]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Information Technology Competence of Business Managers: A Definition and Research Model , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Ta-Tao Chuang,et al.  Examining the impact of organisational and owner's characteristics on the extent of e-commerce adoption in SMEs , 2007 .

[50]  Tony S. Wirjanto,et al.  Sustainability of a Firm's Reputation for Information Technology Capability: The Role of Senior IT Executives , 2013, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[51]  S. Counsell,et al.  Assessing the influence of Environmental and CEO Characteristics for Adoption of Information Technology in Organizations , 2012 .

[52]  Henri Barki,et al.  Rethinking the Concept of User Involvement , 1989, MIS Q..

[53]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  The effects of Distributive, Procedural, and interactional Justice on Digitally Enabled Supply Chain Integration: an upper Echelons Perspective , 2014, PACIS.

[54]  P. Tetlock,et al.  The Effects of Top Management Team Integrative Complexity and Decentralized Decision Making on Corporate Social Performance , 2011 .

[55]  M. Morton,et al.  The corporation of the 1990s: Information technology and organizational transformation , 1993 .

[56]  W. Boeker Executive Migration and Strategic Change: The Effect of Top Manager Movement on Product-Market Entry , 1997 .

[57]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Social shaping of information infrastructure: on being specific about the technology , 2018, ArXiv.

[58]  Richard A. D'Aveni Top Managerial Prestige and Organizational Bankruptcy , 1990 .

[59]  Deepak K. Datta,et al.  Relationships between Top Management Team Characteristics and International Diversification: An Empirical Investigation , 2005 .

[60]  Martin R. W. Hiebl,et al.  The influence of individual executives on corporate financial reporting: A review and outlook from the perspective of upper echelons theory , 2016 .

[61]  Henri Barki,et al.  User Participation, Conflict, and Conflict Resolution: The Mediating Roles of Influence , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[62]  Carlos Devece,et al.  The value of business managers' ‘Information Technology’ competence , 2013 .

[63]  W. Orlikowski The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations , 2014 .

[64]  M. Wiersema,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change , 1992 .

[65]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[66]  Marguerite Schneider,et al.  Characteristics of Innovation and Innovation Adoption in Public Organizations: Assessing the Role of Managers , 2009 .

[67]  Richard L. Priem,et al.  Consensus-Performance Research: Theoretical and Empirical Extensions* , 1995 .

[68]  W. Ocasio TOWARDS AN ATTENTION-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM , 1997 .

[69]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Organizational Information Processing, Competitive Responses, and Performance in the U.S. Domestic Airline Industry , 1991 .

[70]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitudes toward objects as predictors of sin-gle and multiple behavioral criteria , 1974 .

[71]  Marguerite Schneider,et al.  Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of Environment, Organization and Top Managers , 2006 .

[72]  M. Rapert,et al.  The strategic implementation process: evoking strategic consensus through communication , 2002 .

[73]  B. Nielsen,et al.  Top Management Team Nationality Diversity and Firm Performance: A Multilevel Study , 2013 .

[74]  Urs Daellenbach,et al.  FACTORS AFFECTING A FIRM'S COMMITMENT TO INNOVATION. , 1995 .

[75]  Zenlin Kwee,et al.  The Influence of Top Management Team's Corporate Governance Orientation on Strategic Renewal Trajectories: A Longitudinal Analysis of Royal Dutch Shell Plc, 1907–2004 , 2010 .

[76]  W. Orlikowski Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[77]  V. Vroom,et al.  Relationship between age and risk taking among managers. , 1971 .

[78]  Christophe Boone,et al.  Top Management Team Diversity and Firm Performance: Moderators of Functional-Background and Locus-of-Control Diversity , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[79]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[80]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use , 1995 .

[81]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[82]  Donald C. Hambrick,et al.  Attention as the Mediator Between Top Management Team Characteristics and Strategic Change: The Case of Airline Deregulation , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[83]  Mark Srite,et al.  Information technology and culture: Identifying fragmentary and holistic perspectives of culture , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[84]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[85]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[86]  D. Hambrick Upper Echelons Theory: An Update , 2007 .

[87]  Hart O. Awa,et al.  Upper echelon theory (UET): A major determinant of information technology (IT) adoption by SMEs in Nigeria , 2011, J. Syst. Inf. Technol..

[88]  S. Aragon Information System Management Competencies Of Business Executives In Spain: Insights From (...) , 2003 .

[89]  Blake Ives,et al.  Executive Involvement and Participation in the Management of Information Technology , 1991, MIS Q..

[90]  Duanning Zhou,et al.  An exploratory study of the extent of information technology adoption in SMEs: an application of upper echelon theory , 2009, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[91]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies , 2011, MIS Q..

[92]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Sociomateriality - taking the wrong turning? A response to Mutch , 2013, Inf. Organ..

[93]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. , 1990 .

[94]  E. Schein The role of the CEO in the management of change : the case of information technology , 1975 .

[95]  Paul Benjamin Lowry,et al.  Global Journal Prestige and Supporting Disciplines: A Scientometric Study of Information Systems Journals , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[96]  S. Nielsen Top Management Team Diversity: A Review of Theories and Methodologies , 2009 .

[97]  Laurence Brooks,et al.  Creating, Capturing and Measuring Value From IT Investments: Could We Do Better? , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[98]  V. Sambamurthy,et al.  Information Technology Assimilation in Firms: The Influence of Senior Leadership and IT Infrastructures , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[99]  S. Jackson CONSEQUENCES OF GROUP COMPOSITION FOR THE I NTERPERSONAL DYNAMICS OF STRATEGIC ISSUE PROCESSING , 2004 .

[100]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[101]  J. M. Stevens,et al.  Assessing personal, role, and organizational predictors of managerial commitment. , 1978, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[102]  Chris Higgins,et al.  Top management support of enterprise systems implementations , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[103]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality , 2013, Inf. Organ..

[104]  Henri Barki,et al.  Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use , 1994 .

[105]  S. Faraj,et al.  The Materiality of Technology: An Affordance Perspective , 2013 .

[106]  Henri Barki,et al.  Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude , 1994, MIS Q..

[107]  S. Stewman Organizational demography. , 1988, Annual review of sociology.

[108]  N. Carr IT doesn't matter , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[109]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Research notes and communications management and organizational change: A note on the railroad industry , 1991 .

[110]  S Finkelstein,et al.  Power in top management teams: dimensions, measurement, and validation. , 1992, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[111]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Participation in Development and Implementation - Updating An Old, Tired Concept for Today's IS Contexts , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[112]  Abraham Carmeli,et al.  Does participatory decision‐making in top management teams enhance decision effectiveness and firm performance? , 2009 .