Partner Selection in China Interorganizational Patent Cooperation Network Based on Link Prediction Approaches

To enhance competitiveness and protect interest, an increasing number of organizations cooperate on patent applications. Partner selection has attracted much more attention because it directly affects the success of patent cooperation. By collecting some cooperative patents applied for by different categories of organizations in China from 2007 to 2015, an interorganizational patent cooperation network was built for this paper. After analyzing certain basic properties of the network, it was found that the network possessed some typical characteristics of social networks. Moreover, the network could be divided into communities, and three communities were selected to analyze as representative. Furthermore, to explore the partner selection in the patent cooperation network, eight link prediction approaches commonly used in social networks were introduced to run on another interorganizational patent cooperation network built by the patents applied for in 2016. The precision metric results of the eight link prediction approaches show that they are effective in partnership prediction; in particular, the Common Neighbors (CN) index can be effectively applied to the selection of unfamiliar partners for organizations in patent cooperation. Moreover, this paper also verified the trust transitivity based not only on historical cooperation but also on geographical location, and the complementarity of capabilities still plays an important role in partner selection for organizations.

[1]  A. Messeni Petruzzelli,et al.  University–Industry collaborations and international knowledge spillovers: a joint-patent investigation , 2020, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[2]  Aminollah Mahabadi,et al.  A gravitation-based link prediction approach in social networks , 2019, Swarm Evol. Comput..

[3]  R. Venkatesan,et al.  A scalable method for link prediction in large real world networks , 2017, J. Parallel Distributed Comput..

[4]  Yonghong Yan,et al.  Restricted Boltzmann Machine-Based Approaches for Link Prediction in Dynamic Networks , 2018, IEEE Access.

[5]  M. Newman,et al.  Vertex similarity in networks. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Linyuan Lü,et al.  Predicting missing links via local information , 2009, 0901.0553.

[7]  Zhen Liu,et al.  Link prediction in complex networks: A local naïve Bayes model , 2011, ArXiv.

[8]  Yong Geng,et al.  Measuring China's new energy vehicle patents: A social network analysis approach , 2018, Energy.

[9]  Ivan Savin,et al.  Emergence of Innovation Networks from R&D Cooperation with Endogenous Absorptive Capacity , 2013 .

[10]  S. Sohn,et al.  Patent-based framework for assisting entrepreneurial firms’ R&D partner selection: Leveraging their limited resources and managing the tension between learning and protection , 2020 .

[11]  Felix Kölle.  Heterogeneity and cooperation: The role of capability and valuation on public goods provision , 2015 .

[12]  Xun Cai,et al.  A novel network optimization partner selection method based on collaborative and knowledge networks , 2019, Inf. Sci..

[13]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Friends and neighbors on the Web , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[14]  Marko Mladineo,et al.  Selecting manufacturing partners in push and pull-type smart collaborative networks , 2018, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[15]  Nanping Feng,et al.  A conceptual framework of two-stage partner selection in platform-based innovation ecosystems for servitization , 2020 .

[16]  V. Swaminathan,et al.  Factors influencing partner selection in strategic alliances: the moderating role of alliance context , 2008 .

[17]  Mario A. Maggioni,et al.  Space Vs. Networks in the Geography of Innovation: A European Analysis , 2007 .

[18]  Bo Lv,et al.  Research on partner combination selection of the supply chain collaborative product innovation based on product innovative resources , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[19]  Ricardo Choren,et al.  Combining contextual, temporal and topological information for unsupervised link prediction in social networks , 2018, Knowl. Based Syst..

[20]  Hélène Delerue,et al.  Shadow of joint patents: Intellectual property rights sharing by SMEs in contractual R&D alliances , 2018, Journal of Business Research.

[21]  Annefleur R. Krijkamp,et al.  From homophily through embeddedness to strategy: The role of network accuracy in partner selection choices , 2019, Long Range Planning.

[22]  Evelien Reusen,et al.  Trust transfer and partner selection in interfirm relationships , 2020, Accounting, Organizations and Society.

[23]  Aurélien Garivier,et al.  On the Complexity of Best-Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Models , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[24]  Juan Wang,et al.  The link weight adjustment considering historical strategy promotes the cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game , 2020 .

[25]  Sinead Williamson,et al.  Nonparametric Network Models for Link Prediction , 2016, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[26]  Franz Strehl,et al.  The challenge of partner selection in collaborative foresight projects , 2017 .

[27]  Scott Gallagher,et al.  Explaining Alliance Partner Selection: Fit, Trust and Strategic Expediency , 2007 .

[28]  Flaminio Squazzoni,et al.  Trust and Partner Selection in Social Networks: An Experimentally Grounded Model , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[29]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  Identifying and evaluating strategic partners for collaborative R&D: Index-based approach using patents and publications , 2013 .

[30]  Shan Zeng.  Link prediction based on local information considering preferential attachment , 2016 .

[31]  J. Henseler,et al.  Interplay of relational and contractual governance in public-private partnerships: The mediating role of relational norms, trust and partners' contribution , 2018 .

[32]  Cécile Ayerbe,et al.  A method using two dimensions of the patent classification for measuring the technological proximity: an application in identifying a potential R&D partner in biotechnology , 2014 .

[33]  A. Petruzzelli,et al.  Partner Geographic and Organizational Proximity and the Innovative Performance of Knowledge‐Creating Alliances , 2014 .

[34]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Network-Independent Partner Selection and the Evolution of Innovation Networks , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[35]  Yifan Jia,et al.  Predicting links based on knowledge dissemination in complex network , 2017 .

[36]  Brahim Lejdel,et al.  Negotiation and cooperation between agents for generalizing geographic objects , 2019, J. Comput. Lang..

[37]  Mario A. Maggioni,et al.  Knowledge networks across Europe: which distance matters? , 2009 .

[38]  J. C. F. D. Arroyabe,et al.  The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms , 2008 .

[39]  Nikolaus Wolf,et al.  The German Market for Patents during the “Second Industrialization,” 1884–1913: A Gravity Approach , 2013, Business History Review.

[40]  Binglin Gong,et al.  Cooperation through indirect reciprocity: The impact of higher-order history , 2019, Games Econ. Behav..

[41]  Isabella Alcañiz.  Partner selection in international environmental networks: The effect of skills and money on cooperation in the Global South , 2016 .

[42]  Yongtae Park,et al.  A patent portfolio-based approach for assessing potential R&D partners: An application of the Shapley value , 2016 .

[43]  E. Gonçalves,et al.  Why cooperate? The determinants of forming inter-regional connections in the Brazilian patent network , 2020 .

[44]  Mark Goh,et al.  Mechanism for cooperative partner selection: Dual-factor theory perspective , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[45]  Guisheng Yin,et al.  Link prediction in dynamic networks based on the attraction force between nodes , 2019, Knowl. Based Syst..

[46]  Kyriakos Drivas,et al.  Is geographic nearness important for trading ideas? Evidence from the US , 2015 .

[47]  Dongyun Yi,et al.  The degree-related clustering coefficient and its application to link prediction , 2016 .

[48]  Isidro Peña García Pardo,et al.  Influence factors of trust building in cooperation agreements , 2014 .

[49]  Bart Van Looy,et al.  Does Spatial Ambidexterity Pay Off? On the Benefits of Geographic Proximity Between Technology Exploitation and Exploration , 2018 .

[50]  Jie Wu,et al.  Cooperation with competitors and product innovation: Moderating effects of technological capability and alliances with universities , 2014 .