Quality vs. Quantity in Military Procurement
暂无分享,去创建一个
It is often argued that the same expenditures on military procurement would produce a more effective defense if larger numbers of less sophisticated (and thus cheaper) weapons were purchased. This paper shows that such a result can occur even if the military derives no private consumption value from technically sophisticated weapons. Rather, the organization of the decision-making process itself can produce this result. This suggests some possible solutions through organizing decision-making in a different fashion. Copyright 1990 by American Economic Association.
[1] A. Sage. The defense industry , 1982, Proceedings of the IEEE.
[2] Andrew J. Pierre,et al. The defense game , 1986 .
[3] W. Rogerson. Quality vs. Quantity in Military Procurement: An Organizational Theory of Decision Bias , 1988 .
[4] Jean Tirole,et al. Procurement and Renegotiation , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.
[5] R. Preston McAfee,et al. Bidding for contracts: a principal-agent analysis , 1986 .