Assessing Trade‐offs among Multiple Objectives for Humanitarian Aid Delivery Using Expert Preferences

Humanitarian aid agencies deliver emergency supplies and services to people affected by disasters. Scholars and practitioners have developed modeling approaches to support aid delivery planning, but they have used objective functions with little validation as to the trade-offs among the multiple goals of aid delivery. We develop a method to value the performance of aid delivery plans based on expert preferences over five key attributes: the amount of cargo delivered, the prioritization of aid by commodity type, the prioritization of aid by delivery location, the speed of delivery, and the operational cost. Through a conjoint analysis survey, we measure the preferences of 18 experienced humanitarian logisticians. The survey results quantify the importance of each attribute and enable the development of a piecewise linear utility function that can be used as an objective function in optimization models. The results show that the amount of cargo delivered is the most valued objective and cost the least important. In addition, experts prioritize more vulnerable communities and more critical commodities, but not to the exclusion of others. With these insights and the experts' utility functions, better humanitarian objective functions can be developed to enable better aid delivery in emergency response.

[1]  L. V. Wassenhove,et al.  On the appropriate objective function for post‐disaster humanitarian logistics models , 2013 .

[2]  P. Lenk,et al.  Hierarchical Bayes Conjoint Analysis: Recovery of Partworth Heterogeneity from Reduced Experimental Designs , 1996 .

[3]  Karl F. Doerner,et al.  Multicriteria tour planning for mobile healthcare facilities in a developing country , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Irina S. Dolinskaya,et al.  Disaster relief routing: Integrating research and practice , 2012 .

[5]  E. Savas.  On Equity in Providing Public Services , 1978 .

[6]  Benita M. Beamon,et al.  Performance measurement in humanitarian relief chains , 2008 .

[7]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Hierarchical Bayes Models , 2006 .

[8]  Ann Melissa Campbell,et al.  Routing for Relief Efforts , 2008, Transp. Sci..

[9]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Multi-objective optimal planning for designing relief delivery systems , 2007 .

[10]  Anne Leslie Davidson.  Key performance indicators in humanitarian logistics , 2006 .

[11]  Benita M. Beamon,et al.  Last Mile Distribution in Humanitarian Relief , 2008, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[12]  P. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook , 1978 .

[13]  Mark J. Garratt,et al.  Efficient Experimental Design with Marketing Research Applications , 1994 .

[14]  Michael T. Marsh,et al.  Equity measurement in facility location analysis: A review and framework , 1994 .

[15]  Richard F. Hartl,et al.  A Bi-objective Metaheuristic for Disaster Relief Operation Planning , 2010, Advances in Multi-Objective Nature Inspired Computing.

[16]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Probabilistic Polyhedral Methods for Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis: Theory and Application , 2007 .

[17]  Karen Renee Smilowitz,et al.  Models for Relief Routing: Equity, Efficiency and Efficacy , 2011 .

[18]  D. Fryback,et al.  HALYS and QALYS and DALYS, Oh My: similarities and differences in summary measures of population Health. , 2002, Annual review of public health.

[19]  J. Bryant,et al.  Health policy approaches to measuring and valuing human life: conceptual and ethical issues. , 1995, American journal of public health.

[20]  Peter A. Rogerson,et al.  A logistics model for emergency supply of critical items in the aftermath of a disaster , 2011 .

[21]  Shaligram Pokharel,et al.  Optimization models in emergency logistics: A literature review , 2012 .

[22]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  The art of assessing multiattribute utility functions , 1977 .

[23]  Srinivas Peeta,et al.  Multicommodity Maximal Covering Network Design Problem for Planning Critical Routes for Earthquake Response , 2003 .

[24]  P. Green,et al.  Thirty Years of Conjoint Analysis: Reflections and Prospects , 2001 .

[25]  Saul I. Gass,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process - An Exposition , 2001, Oper. Res..