Impaired auditory functions underlying degraded speech perception in noise

Hearing-impaired people often experience great dif culty with speech communication when background noise is present. In most cases, the problem persists even if reduced audibility has been compensated for by hearing aids. Clearly, other impairment factors besides reduced audibility must be involved. In order to minimize confounding effects, the subjects participating in this study consisted of groups with homogeneous, symmetric audiograms. The perceptual listening experiments assessed the speech intelligibility in the presence of stationary as well as uctuating interferers, the individual’s frequency selectivity and the integrity of temporal fine-structure processing. The latter was addressed by measuring the lateralization threshold for low-frequency tones with ongoing interaural phase delays. In addition, this lateralization threshold was measured in a stationary noise background in order to assess the persistence of the ne- structure processing to interfering noise. This may play a crucial role for the ability to listen into the dips of fluctuating background interferers.

[1]  C Kaernbach,et al.  Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Emily Buss,et al.  Temporal Fine-Structure Cues to Speech and Pure Tone Modulation in Observers with Sensorineural Hearing Loss , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[3]  J W Horst Frequency discrimination of complex signals, frequency selectivity, and speech perception in hearing-impaired subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Binaural pitch perception in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners , 2007, Hearing Research.

[5]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  R. Patterson,et al.  Off-frequency listening and auditory-filter asymmetry. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  K. Wagener,et al.  Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise: Diseño, optimización y evaluación de la prueba Danesa de frases en ruido , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[8]  H S Colburn,et al.  Effects of Reference Interaural Time and Intensity Differences on Binaural Performance in Listeners with Normal and Impaired Hearing , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[9]  L. Rabiner,et al.  Binaural release from masking for speech and gain in intelligibility. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  S Rosen,et al.  Auditory filter nonlinearity at 2 kHz in normal hearing listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  B C Moore,et al.  Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids. , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[12]  W A Dreschler,et al.  Relations between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing-impaired subjects. II. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  H S Colburn,et al.  Frequency dependence of binaural performance in listeners with impaired binaural hearing. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Laurent Demany,et al.  Consequences of cochlear damage for the detection of interaural phase differences. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.