Redevelopment of a Morphological Class

Coronal stop deletion (or‚`TD Deletion‚`) is the paradigm sociolinguistic variable. It was first described in African American English (Labov et al., 1968) as a rule whereby word final /Ct/ and /Cd/ clusters simplify by deleting the coronal stop. It has since been found in many dialects and varieties of English. Aside from the very regular phonological and phonetic factors which condition whether TD Deletion applies, morphological structure also appears to have an effect. The three morphological categories of primary interest are (i) monomorphemes}, (ii) regular past tense verbs and (iii) semiweak past tense verbs. In almost every dialect studied, the order of morphological classes from least favoring deletion to most favoring deletion is as given in (1). (1) monomorphemes > semiweak > regular past tense In this paper, I will be focusing on the difference between semiweak and regular past tense. I will pursue a revised version of the analysis in Guy & Boyd (1990), casting it in terms of Competing Grammars and Distributed Morphology. Specifically, I will propose that the rate of phonological TD Deletion is the same for the regular past and the semiweak. What leads to higher TD Absence in the semiweak verbs is variable morphological absence of /t/, i.e., there is a competing morphological analysis where the past tense of keep is simply "kep", instead of "kept". This working paper is available in University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/ vol18/iss1/10 Redevelopment of a Morphological Class

[1]  Sali A. Tagliamonte,et al.  New perspectives on an ol' variable: (t,d) in British English , 2005, Language Variation and Change.

[2]  Charles D. Yang,et al.  Knowledge and learning in natural language , 2000 .

[3]  A. Kroch Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change , 1989, Language Variation and Change.

[4]  Linda Wilbanks,et al.  IT Productivity = ?? , 2009, IT Prof..

[5]  William Labov,et al.  A Study of the Non-Standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican Speakers in New York City. Volume I: Phonological and Grammatical Analysis. , 1968 .

[6]  Sali A. Tagliamonte,et al.  Peaks Beyond Phonology: Adolescence, Incrementation, and Language Change , 2009 .

[7]  Morris Halle,et al.  Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection , 1993 .

[8]  William Labov,et al.  The child as linguistic historian , 1989, Language Variation and Change.

[9]  Gregory R. Guy,et al.  The development of a morphological class , 1990, Language Variation and Change.

[10]  Jennifer Smith,et al.  Universal and dialect-specific pathways of acquisition: Caregivers, children, and t/d deletion , 2009, Language Variation and Change.

[11]  Gregory R. Guy Explanation in variable phonology: An exponential model of morphological constraints , 1991, Language Variation and Change.

[12]  S Pinker,et al.  Overregularization in language acquisition. , 1992, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[13]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change , 2002, Language Variation and Change.

[14]  Steven Pinker,et al.  The Past and Future of the Past Tense Debate , 2002 .

[15]  Peter L. Patrick Creoles at the intersection of variable processes: -t,d deletion and past-marking in the Jamaican mesolect , 1991, Language Variation and Change.

[16]  Santa Ana A. Otto Chicano English evidence for the exponential hypothesis: A variable rule pervades lexical phonology , 1992, Language Variation and Change.

[17]  W. Labov Principles Of Linguistic Change , 1994 .

[18]  A. Kroch Morphosyntactic Variation , 1997 .