Scoring biosecurity in European conventional broiler production

ABSTRACT Good biosecurity procedures are crucial for healthy animal production. The aim of this study was to quantify the level of biosecurity on conventional broiler farms in Europe, following a standardized procedure, thereby trying to identify factors that are amenable to improvement. The current study used a risk‐based weighted scoring system (biocheck.ugent ®) to assess the level of biosecurity on 399 conventional broiler farms in 5 EU member states. The scoring system consisted of 2 main categories, namely external and internal biosecurity, which had 8 and 3 subcategories, respectively. Biosecurity was quantified by converting the answers to 97 questions into a score from 0 to 100. The minimum score, “0,” represents total absence of any biosecurity measure on the broiler farm, whereas the maximum score, “100,” means full application of all investigated biosecurity measures. A possible correlation between biosecurity and farm characteristics was investigated by multivariate linear regression analysis. The participating broiler farms scored better for internal biosecurity (mean score of 76.6) than for external biosecurity (mean 68.4). There was variation between the mean biosecurity scores for the different member states, ranging from 59.8 to 78.0 for external biosecurity and from 63.0 to 85.6 for internal biosecurity. Within the category of external biosecurity, the subcategory related to “infrastructure and vectors” had the highest mean score (82.4), while the subcategory with the lowest score related to biosecurity procedures for “visitors and staff” (mean 51.5). Within the category of internal biosecurity, the subcategory “disease management” had the highest mean score (65.8). In the multivariate regression model a significant negative correlation was found between internal biosecurity and the number of employees and farm size. These findings indicate that there is a lot of variation for external and internal biosecurity on the participating broiler farms, suggesting that improvements are possible. Since the subcategory “visitors and staff” scored the lowest, better education of broiler farmers and their staff may help to improve overall biosecurity on broiler farms in Europe.

[1]  L. Aquilanti,et al.  Prevalence and risk factors for thermotolerant species of Campylobacter in poultry meat at retail in Europe , 2017, Poultry science.

[2]  M. Sandberg,et al.  Compliance/non‐compliance with biosecurity rules specified in the Danish Quality Assurance system (KIK) and Campylobacter‐positive broiler flocks 2012 and 2013 , 2017, Poultry science.

[3]  J. Niemi,et al.  Farm characteristics and perceptions regarding costs contribute to the adoption of biosecurity in Finnish pig and cattle farms , 2016 .

[4]  J. Dewulf,et al.  The biosecurity status and its associations with production and management characteristics in farrow-to-finish pig herds. , 2016, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[5]  S. S. Lewerin,et al.  Risk assessment as a tool for improving external biosecurity at farm level , 2015, BMC Veterinary Research.

[6]  A. Lindberg,et al.  Biosecurity level and health management practices in 60 Swedish farrow-to-finish herds , 2015, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.

[7]  J. Dewulf,et al.  Biocheck.UGent: a quantitative tool to measure biosecurity at broiler farms and the relationship with technical performances and antimicrobial use. , 2014, Poultry science.

[8]  Y. Rosseel,et al.  Pig, cattle and poultry farmers with a known interest in research have comparable perspectives on disease prevention and on-farm biosecurity. , 2014, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[9]  J. Dewulf,et al.  Relationship between biosecurity and production/antimicrobial treatment characteristics in pig herds. , 2013, The Veterinary Journal.

[10]  S. Vong,et al.  Biosecurity measures for backyard poultry in developing countries: a systematic review , 2012, BMC Veterinary Research.

[11]  Kirsi-Maarit Siekkinen,et al.  Measuring the costs of biosecurity on poultry farms: a case study in broiler production in Finland , 2012, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.

[12]  I. Connerton,et al.  Biosecurity-Based Interventions and Strategies To Reduce Campylobacter spp. on Poultry Farms , 2011, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  M. Racicot,et al.  Description of 44 biosecurity errors while entering and exiting poultry barns based on video surveillance in Quebec, Canada. , 2011, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[14]  Els Ducheyne,et al.  Assessing biosecurity practices, movements and densities of poultry sites across Belgium, resulting in different farm risk-groups for infectious disease introduction and spread. , 2011, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[15]  F. Dórea,et al.  Survey of Biosecurity Protocols and Practices Adopted by Growers on Commercial Poultry Farms in Georgia, U. S. A , 2010, Avian diseases.

[16]  M. Valsecchi,et al.  Risk factors for highly pathogenic H7N1 avian influenza virus infection in poultry during the 1999-2000 epidemic in Italy. , 2009, Veterinary journal.

[17]  D. Cole,et al.  Human Contacts and Potential Pathways of Disease Introduction on Georgia Poultry Farms , 2009, Avian diseases.

[18]  F. Menzies,et al.  Campylobacter spp. in conventional broiler flocks in Northern Ireland: epidemiology and risk factors. , 2008, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[19]  Ellen K Silbergeld,et al.  The Animal-Human Interface and Infectious Disease in Industrial Food Animal Production: Rethinking Biosecurity and Biocontainment , 2008, Public health reports.

[20]  I. East.  Adoption of biosecurity practices in the Australian poultry industries. , 2007, Australian veterinary journal.

[21]  Y. Guan,et al.  Risk for Infection with Highly Pathogenic Influenza A Virus (H5N1) in Chickens, Hong Kong, 2002 , 2007, Emerging infectious diseases.

[22]  G. Garner,et al.  A cross-sectional survey of Australian chicken farms to identify risk factors associated with seropositivity to Newcastle-disease virus. , 2006, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[23]  A. Bowling.  Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. , 2005, Journal of public health.

[24]  J. Stegeman,et al.  Risk factors for the introduction of high pathogenicity Avian Influenza virus into poultry farms during the epidemic in the Netherlands in 2003. , 2005, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[25]  E. Nielsen,et al.  Prevalence and diversity of Campylobacter jejuni in pig herds on farms with and without cattle or poultry. , 2005, Journal of Food Protection.

[26]  K. Liljebjelke,et al.  Vertical and horizontal transmission of salmonella within integrated broiler production system. , 2005, Foodborne pathogens and disease.

[27]  L. Garber,et al.  Evaluation of risk factors for the spread of low pathogenicity H7N2 avian influenza virus among commercial poultry farms. , 2005, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[28]  S. Nielsen,et al.  Prevalence and transmission of haemolytic Gallibacterium species in chicken production systems with different biosecurity levels , 2003, Avian pathology : journal of the W.V.P.A.

[29]  R. Scheidegger,et al.  Incidence of Reinfections with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in Pig Farms Located in Respiratory-Disease-Free Regions of Switzerland – Identification and Quantification of Risk Factors , 2002, Acta veterinaria Scandinavica.

[30]  M. Colby,et al.  A Survey of Biosecurity Practices as Risk Factors Affecting Broiler Performance on the Delmarva Peninsula , 2002, Avian diseases.

[31]  G. Salvat,et al.  Risk factors for Campylobacter spp. contamination in French broiler-chicken flocks at the end of the rearing period. , 2001, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[32]  R. Davies,et al.  A trial of biosecurity as a means to control Campylobacter infection of broiler chickens. , 2001, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[33]  C. Staubach,et al.  Epidemiology of classical swine fever in Germany in the 1990s. , 2000, Veterinary microbiology.

[34]  A. R. Sayers,et al.  A longitudinal study of campylobacter infection of broiler flocks in Great Britain. , 2000, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[35]  M. Madsen,et al.  Thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in Danish broiler production: A cross-sectional survey and a retrospective analysis of risk factors for occurrence in broiler flocks , 2000, Avian pathology : journal of the W.V.P.A.

[36]  L. Audigé,et al.  Epidemiological study of Newcastle disease in backyard poultry and wild bird populations in Switzerland. , 1999, Avian pathology : journal of the W.V.P.A.

[37]  M. Dekich.  Broiler industry strategies for control of respiratory and enteric diseases , 1998, Poultry Science.

[38]  R. Nespeca,et al.  Validation of a poultry biosecurity survey. , 1997, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[39]  M. Meroz,et al.  Disinfecting poultry production premises. , 1995, Revue scientifique et technique.

[40]  S. Ostroff,et al.  Epidemiological investigation of risk factors for Campylobacter colonization in Norwegian broiler flocks , 1993, Epidemiology and Infection.

[41]  J. P. Blake,et al.  Alternatives for the Disposal of Poultry Carcasses , 1992 .

[42]  G. Ada,et al.  Vaccines and vaccination. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  H. Fernández,et al.  About Campylobacter spp. , 2016 .

[44]  M. Tabidi,et al.  DATA ANALYSIS OF BIOSECURITY MEASURES FOR POULTRY FARMS REGISTRATION IN , 2014 .

[45]  N. Williams,et al.  Questionnaire survey among broiler producers in six European countries , 2012 .

[46]  Maria Laanen,et al.  Biosecurity on pig herds: development of an on-line scoring system and the results of the first 99 participating herds. , 2010 .

[47]  S. Lister.  Chapter 4 – Biosecurity in poultry management , 2008 .

[48]  L. Sims.  Risks associated with poultry production systems , 2008 .

[49]  L. Jemeršić,et al.  Epidemiology of classical swine fever in Croatia, part 1 , 2007 .

[50]  Antti Ahlava,et al.  Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira , 2006 .