A randomized study of coronary angioplasty compared with bypass surgery in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease. German Angioplasty Bypass Surgery Investigation (GABI)

BACKGROUND The standard treatment for patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary artery disease is coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG). Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is widely used as an alternative approach to revascularization, but a systematic comparison of the two procedures is needed. We compared the outcomes in patients one year after complete revascularization with CABG or PTCA. METHODS A total of 8981 patients with multivessel coronary disease were screened at eight clinical sites, and 359 patients were randomly assigned to undergo CABG (177 patients) or PTCA (182 patients). Enrollment required that complete revascularization of at least two major vessels supplying different myocardial regions be deemed clinically necessary and technically feasible. RESULTS Among the patients in the CABG group, an average of 2.2 +/- 0.6 vessels were grafted, and among those in the PTCA group, 1.9 +/- 0.5 vessels were dilated. After CABG, hospitalization was longer (median, 19, as compared with 5 days for PTCA), and Q-wave myocardial infarction in relation to the procedure was more frequent (8.1 percent, as compared with 2.3 percent after PTCA; P = 0.022), whereas in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between the two groups (2.5 percent in the CABG group and 1.1 percent in the PTCA group). At discharge 93 percent of the patients in the CABG group were free of angina, as compared with 82 percent of those in the PTCA group (P = 0.005). During the first year of follow-up, further interventions were necessary in 44 percent of the patients in the PTCA group (repeated PTCA in 23 percent, CABG in 18 percent, and both in 3 percent) but in only 6 percent of the patients in the CABG group (repeated CABG in 1 percent and PTCA in 5 percent; P < 0.001). Seventy-four percent of the patients in the CABG group and 71 percent of those in the PTCA group were free of angina one year after treatment. Exercise capacity improved similarly in both groups. However, 22 percent of the CABG group, as compared with only 12 percent of the PTCA group, did not require antianginal medication (P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS In selected patients with multivessel coronary disease, PTCA and CABG as initial treatments resulted in equivalent improvement in angina after one year. However, in order to achieve similar clinical outcomes, the patients treated with PTCA were more likely to require further interventions and antianginal drugs, whereas the patients treated with CABG were more likely to sustain an acute myocardial infarction at the time of the procedure.

[1]  E. Topol,et al.  Is traditionally defined complete revascularization needed for patients with multivessel disease treated by elective coronary angioplasty? Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study (MAPS) Group. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  I. Palacios,et al.  Argentine randomized trial of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery in multivessel disease (ERACI): in-hospital results and 1-year follow-up. ERACI Group. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  D. Fassbender,et al.  [Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in coronary multivessel disease: clinical course in relation to degree of functional revascularization]. , 1993, Zeitschrift für Kardiologie.

[4]  R. Califf,et al.  A Comparison of Directional Atherectomy with Coronary Angioplasty in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease , 1993 .

[5]  RITA-2 trial participants Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial , 1993, The Lancet.

[6]  E. Jones,et al.  Coronary surgery and coronary angioplasty in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  G. Vetrovec,et al.  Long-term efficacy of triple-vessel angioplasty in patients with severe three-vessel coronary artery disease. , 1992, American heart journal.

[8]  B. Gersh,et al.  Effect of Completeness of Revascularization on Long‐term Outcome of Patients With Three‐Vessel Disease Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Report From the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry , 1992, Circulation.

[9]  A. Jacobs,et al.  The degree of revascularization and outcome after multivessel coronary angioplasty. , 1992, American heart journal.

[10]  J. Vacek,et al.  Comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease. , 1992, American Journal of Cardiology.

[11]  P. Hartigan,et al.  A comparison of angioplasty with medical therapy in the treatment of single-vessel coronary artery disease. Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  S. King Role of new technology in balloon angioplasty. , 1991, Circulation.

[13]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Multivessel coronary angioplasty from 1980 to 1989: procedural results and long-term outcome. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  E J Topol,et al.  Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. , 1990, Circulation.

[15]  K. Bailey,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with multivessel coronary disease: how important is complete revascularization for cardiac event-free survival? , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Unstable angina. A classification. , 1989, Circulation.

[17]  V. Parsonnet,et al.  Coronary angioplasty versus coronary bypass. Three-year follow-up of a matched series of 250 patients. , 1989, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[18]  B. Chaitman,et al.  Coronary angioplasty: a therapeutic option for symptomatic patients with two and three vessel coronary disease. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  D. Faxon,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in 1985-1986 and 1977-1981. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Registry. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  M. Nobuyoshi,et al.  Restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: serial angiographic follow-up of 229 patients. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  B. Chaitman,et al.  Multilesion coronary angioplasty: clinical and angiographic follow-up. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  P. Lichtlen,et al.  [Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: qualifications of the physician and patient safety, logistic considerations]. , 1987, Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie.

[23]  E. Topol,et al.  Multiple vessel coronary angioplasty: classification, results, and patterns of restenosis in 494 consecutive patients. , 1987, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[24]  H. Kennedy,et al.  Immediate and short-term benefit of multilesion coronary angioplasty: influence of degree of revascularization. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  C. Maynard,et al.  Surgical survival in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry. , 1985, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[26]  B. Gersh,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass. Isn't it time for a randomized trial? , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  L. Wilkins Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Quality of life in patients randomly assigned to treatment groups. , 1983, Circulation.

[28]  E. Jones,et al.  Importance of complete revascularization in performance of the coronary bypass operation. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[29]  M. Pike,et al.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples. , 1977, British Journal of Cancer.

[30]  L. Campeau Letter: Grading of angina pectoris. , 1976, Circulation.