A randomized study of coronary angioplasty compared with bypass surgery in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease. German Angioplasty Bypass Surgery Investigation (GABI)
暂无分享,去创建一个
C. Hamm | H. Rupprecht | W. Bleifeld | J. Berger | J. Reimers | H. Rupprecht | T. Ischinger | J. Berger | C. W. Hamm | Walter Bleifeld
[1] E. Topol,et al. Is traditionally defined complete revascularization needed for patients with multivessel disease treated by elective coronary angioplasty? Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study (MAPS) Group. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[2] I. Palacios,et al. Argentine randomized trial of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery in multivessel disease (ERACI): in-hospital results and 1-year follow-up. ERACI Group. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[3] D. Fassbender,et al. [Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in coronary multivessel disease: clinical course in relation to degree of functional revascularization]. , 1993, Zeitschrift für Kardiologie.
[4] R. Califf,et al. A Comparison of Directional Atherectomy with Coronary Angioplasty in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease , 1993 .
[5] RITA-2 trial participants. Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial , 1993, The Lancet.
[6] E. Jones,et al. Coronary surgery and coronary angioplasty in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.
[7] G. Vetrovec,et al. Long-term efficacy of triple-vessel angioplasty in patients with severe three-vessel coronary artery disease. , 1992, American heart journal.
[8] B. Gersh,et al. Effect of Completeness of Revascularization on Long‐term Outcome of Patients With Three‐Vessel Disease Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Report From the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry , 1992, Circulation.
[9] A. Jacobs,et al. The degree of revascularization and outcome after multivessel coronary angioplasty. , 1992, American heart journal.
[10] J. Vacek,et al. Comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease. , 1992, American Journal of Cardiology.
[11] P. Hartigan,et al. A comparison of angioplasty with medical therapy in the treatment of single-vessel coronary artery disease. Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.
[12] S. King. Role of new technology in balloon angioplasty. , 1991, Circulation.
[13] J. O’Keefe,et al. Multivessel coronary angioplasty from 1980 to 1989: procedural results and long-term outcome. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[14] E J Topol,et al. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. , 1990, Circulation.
[15] K. Bailey,et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with multivessel coronary disease: how important is complete revascularization for cardiac event-free survival? , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[16] E. Braunwald,et al. Unstable angina. A classification. , 1989, Circulation.
[17] V. Parsonnet,et al. Coronary angioplasty versus coronary bypass. Three-year follow-up of a matched series of 250 patients. , 1989, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[18] B. Chaitman,et al. Coronary angioplasty: a therapeutic option for symptomatic patients with two and three vessel coronary disease. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[19] D. Faxon,et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in 1985-1986 and 1977-1981. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Registry. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.
[20] M. Nobuyoshi,et al. Restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: serial angiographic follow-up of 229 patients. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[21] B. Chaitman,et al. Multilesion coronary angioplasty: clinical and angiographic follow-up. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[22] P. Lichtlen,et al. [Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: qualifications of the physician and patient safety, logistic considerations]. , 1987, Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie.
[23] E. Topol,et al. Multiple vessel coronary angioplasty: classification, results, and patterns of restenosis in 494 consecutive patients. , 1987, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.
[24] H. Kennedy,et al. Immediate and short-term benefit of multilesion coronary angioplasty: influence of degree of revascularization. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[25] C. Maynard,et al. Surgical survival in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry. , 1985, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[26] B. Gersh,et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass. Isn't it time for a randomized trial? , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.
[27] L. Wilkins. Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Quality of life in patients randomly assigned to treatment groups. , 1983, Circulation.
[28] E. Jones,et al. Importance of complete revascularization in performance of the coronary bypass operation. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.
[29] M. Pike,et al. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples. , 1977, British Journal of Cancer.
[30] L. Campeau. Letter: Grading of angina pectoris. , 1976, Circulation.