Joint inversion of long‐period magnetotelluric data and surface‐wave dispersion curves for anisotropic structure: Application to data from Central Germany

Geophysical datasets sensitive to different physical parameters can be used to improve resolution of Earth's internal structure. Herein, we jointly invert long‐period magnetotelluric (MT) data and surface‐wave dispersion curves. Our approach is based on a joint inversion using a genetic algorithm for a one‐dimensional (1‐D) isotropic structure, which we extend to 1‐D anisotropic media. We apply our new anisotropic joint inversion to datasets from Central Germany demonstrating the capacity of our joint inversion algorithm to establish a 1‐D anisotropic model that fits MT and seismic datasets simultaneously and providing new information regarding the deep structure in Central Germany. The lithosphere/asthenosphere boundary is found at approx. 84 km depth and two main anisotropic layers with coincident most conductive/seismic fast‐axis direction are resolved at lower crustal and asthenospheric depths. We also quantify the amount of seismic and electrical anisotropy in the asthenosphere showing an emerging agreement between the two anisotropic coefficients.

[1]  F. A. Dahlen,et al.  The azimuthal dependence of Love and Rayleigh wave propagation in a slightly anisotropic medium , 1973 .

[2]  A. Duba,et al.  Free carbon & electrical conductivity in the Earth's mantle , 1982 .

[3]  Alan G. Jones,et al.  On the electrical crust—mantle structure in Fennoscandia: no Moho, and the asthenosphere revealed? , 1982 .

[4]  R. Gordon,et al.  Current plate velocities relative to the hotspots incorporating the NUVEL-1 global plate motion model , 1990 .

[5]  S. Karato,et al.  The role of hydrogen in the electrical conductivity of the upper mantle , 1990, Nature.

[6]  S. Constable,et al.  The electrical conductivity of an isotropic olivine mantle , 1992 .

[7]  E. R. Engdahl,et al.  Constraints on seismic velocities in the Earth from traveltimes , 1995 .

[8]  M. Savage.  Seismic anisotropy and mantle deformation: What have we learned from shear wave splitting? , 1999 .

[9]  I. Ferguson,et al.  The electric Moho , 2001, Nature.

[10]  A. Gatzemeier,et al.  Evidence of electrical anisotropic structures in the lower crust and the upper mantle beneath the Rhenish Shield , 2002 .

[11]  F. Simpson.  Intensity and direction of lattice-preferred orientation of olivine: are electrical and seismic anisotropies of the Australian mantle reconcilable? , 2002 .

[12]  Alan G. Jones,et al.  The electrical structure of the Slave craton , 2003 .

[13]  D. Eaton,et al.  Lithospheric anisotropy structure inferred from collocated teleseismic and magnetotelluric observations: Great Slave Lake shear zone, northern Canada , 2004 .

[14]  Hans-Peter Harjes,et al.  One-dimensional models of shear wave velocity for the eastern Mediterranean obtained from the inversion of Rayleigh wave phase velocities and tectonic implications , 2004 .

[15]  H. Bibby,et al.  The magnetotelluric phase tensor , 2004 .

[16]  M. Moorkamp,et al.  3D modelling of electrical anisotropy from electromagnetic array data: hypothesis testing for different upper mantle conduction mechanisms , 2005 .

[17]  A. Tommasi,et al.  Flow and electrical anisotropy in the upper mantle: Finite-element models constraints on the effects of olivine crystal preferred orientation and microstructure , 2006 .

[18]  M. Moorkamp,et al.  Joint inversion of teleseismic receiver functions and magnetotelluric data using a genetic algorithm: Are seismic velocities and electrical conductivities compatible? , 2007 .

[19]  S. Lebedev,et al.  Stratified seismic anisotropy reveals past and present deformation beneath the East-central United States , 2008 .

[20]  Alan G. Jones,et al.  The elusive lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary (LAB) beneath cratons , 2009 .

[21]  Alan G. Jones,et al.  Joint inversion of receiver functions, surface wave dispersion, and magnetotelluric data , 2010 .

[22]  W. Geissler,et al.  Thickness of the central and eastern European lithosphere as seen by S receiver functions , 2010 .