Patterns of female fertility in heterostylous Primula sieboldii under pollinater limitation

1 In order to identify the mode and intensity of fertility selection in a heterostylous population under severe pollinator limitation, morph composition and intraand intermorph pollen loads, fruit and seed set were investigated in an isolated population of the endangered, heterostylous species Primula sieboldii. 2 Seventy-six genets were classified as either of the pin or thrum morph on the basis of measurements of stigma-anther separation and relative anther height, except for one genet that exhibited a short homostylous phenotype. There was a 1:1 ratio of pin and thrum plants in the population. 3 Measurements of stigmatic pollen load indicated that legitimate pollination (i.e. by the opposite morph) was extremely limited. Female fertility was generally low but varied significantly among style morphs and among genets within morphs. The pin morph showed significantly higher fertility than the thrum morph. High fruit and seed set was recorded for the short homostyle. 4 Legitimate pollination by hand resulted in a significant increase in fruit and seed set except for the homostyle where high spontaneous seed set already occurred. Intragenet pollination or illegitimate (i.e. intramorph) pollination resulted in no seed set. 5 It was concluded that pollen limitation is largely responsible for the low female fertility of plants in the population. Under severe pollinator limitation, it is possible that the self-fertile homostyle will have a selective advantage and will spread in the population.

[1]  F. Wedderburn,et al.  Secondary homostyly in Primula L.; evidence for the model of the ‘S’ supergene , 1992 .

[2]  I. Washitani,et al.  Species Biology of Primula sieboldii for the Conservation of its Lowland-habitat Population : I. Inter-clonal Variations in the Flowering Phenology, Pollen Load and Female Fertility Components , 1991 .

[3]  J. Silvertown,et al.  Population ecology of heterostyle and homostyle Primula vulgaris : growth, survival and reproduction in field populations , 1990 .

[4]  F. Wedderburn,et al.  Variation in within‐morph incompatibility inhibition sites in heteromorphic Primula L. , 1990 .

[5]  J. D. Karron BREEDING SYSTEMS AND LEVELS OF INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN GEOGRAPHICALLY RESTRICTED AND WIDESPREAD SPECIES OF ASTRAGALUS (FABACEAE) , 1989 .

[6]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  The evolution of distyly in Primula vulgaris , 1986 .

[7]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Breeding system evolution in Primula vulgaris and the role of reproductive assurance , 1986, Heredity.

[8]  S. Barrett,et al.  ON THE DARWINIAN HYPOTHESIS OF THE ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF TRISTYLY , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  A high rate of self-fertilization and increased seed fertility of homostyle primroses , 1984, Nature.

[10]  A. Richards,et al.  THE BREEDING SYSTEM IN PRIMULA VERIS L. , 1982 .

[11]  F. R. Ganders The biology of heterostyly , 1979 .

[12]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  A Model for the Evolution of Distyly , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[13]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  The Maintenance and Breakdown of Distyly , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[14]  J. Olesen FLORAL MORPHOLOGY AND POLLEN FLOW IN THE HETEROSTYLOUS SPECIES PULMONARIA OBSCURA DUMORT (BORAGINACEAE). , 1979, The New phytologist.

[15]  S. K. Jain,et al.  The Evolution of Inbreeding in Plants , 1976 .

[16]  F. R. Ganders Disassortative pollination in the distylous plant Jepsonia heterandra , 1974 .

[17]  H. G. Baker THE EVOLUTION, FUNCTIONING AND BREAKDOWN OF HETEROMORPHIC INCOMPATIBILITY SYSTEMS. I. THE PLUMBAGINACEAE , 1966, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  W. Bodmer The genetics of homostyly in populations of Primula vulgaris , 1960, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[19]  J. Dowrick,et al.  Heterostyly and homostyly in Primula obconica , 1956, Heredity.

[20]  S. Barrett Evolution and Function of Heterostyly , 1992, Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[21]  S. Barrett Heterostylous Genetic Polymorphisms: Model Systems for Evolutionary Analysis , 1992 .

[22]  K. Holsinger,et al.  Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants : implications for conservation , 1991 .

[23]  S. Barrett,et al.  The evolution, maintenance, and loss of self incompatibility systems. , 1988 .

[24]  O. Solbrig,et al.  Demography and Evolution in Plant Populations , 1980 .

[25]  F. R. Ganders HETEROSTYLY, HOMOSTYLY, AND FECUNDITY IN AMSINCKIA SPECTABILIS (BORAGINACEAE) , 1975 .