Construct Validity of Self- and Peer Evaluations of Performance Dimensions in an Assessment Center

The construct validity of final self- and peer evaluations in an assessment center was examined within a nomological network of conceptually related and unrelated variables. Data included self-, peer, and assessor evaluations, cognitive ability and personality measures, and job advancement. The evidence for construct validity was stronger for peer than for self-evaluations, and for more easily observable dimensions than for dimensions requiring greater inferential judgment. Self- and peer evaluations were associated with assessor ratings of management potential, whereas only peer evaluations predicted job advancement. Implications for the use of self- and peer evaluations in assessment centers and the need for further research are discussed.

[1]  Jerome A. Katz,et al.  RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF IN‐BASKET PERFORMANCE MEASURES , 1990 .

[2]  James W. Smither,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF THE EFFECTS OF USING BEHAVIOR CHECKLISTS ON THE CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENT CENTER DIMENSIONS , 1990 .

[3]  L. Shore,et al.  CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF TWO CATEGORIES OF ASSESSMENT CENTER DIMENSION RATINGS , 1990 .

[4]  D. P. Baker,et al.  Construct validity of in-basket scores , 1989 .

[5]  George C. Thornton,et al.  Number of assessment center dimensions as a determinant of assessor accuracy. , 1989 .

[6]  Gerald V. Barrett,et al.  Validity of Personnel Decisions: A Conceptual Analysis of the Inferential and Evidential Bases , 1989 .

[7]  R. Feltham.  Validity of a police assessment centre: A 1–19‐year follow‐up , 1988 .

[8]  John Schaubroeck,et al.  A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. , 1988 .

[9]  C. Russell.  Person Characteristic Versus Role Congruency Explanations for Assessment Center Ratings , 1987 .

[10]  Ivan T. Robertson,et al.  The psychometric properties and design of managerial assessment centres: Dimensions into exercises won't go , 1987 .

[11]  P. Bycio,et al.  Situational specificity in assessment center ratings: A confirmatory factor analysis. , 1987 .

[12]  George C. Thornton,et al.  Meta-analysis of assessment center validity. , 1987 .

[13]  Richard J. Klimoski,et al.  WHY DO ASSESSMENT CENTERS WORK? THE PUZZLE OF ASSESSMENT CENTER VALIDITY , 1987 .

[14]  D. C. Howell.  Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[15]  Frank J. Landy,et al.  Stamp collecting versus science: Validation as hypothesis testing. , 1986 .

[16]  A. Dalessio,et al.  INFLUENCE OF ASSESSMENT CENTER METHODS ON ASSESSORS’RATINGS , 1986 .

[17]  J. Werbel,et al.  Effects of Purpose of the Appraisal and Expectation of Validation On Self-Appraisal Leniency , 1986 .

[18]  Michael P. Kirsch,et al.  METAANALYSES OF VALIDITY STUDIES PUBLISHED BETWEEN 1964 AND 1982 AND THE INVESTIGATION OF STUDY CHARACTERISTICS , 1984 .

[19]  Richard D. Neidig,et al.  Multiple assessment center exercises and job relatedness. , 1984 .

[20]  J. J. Turnage,et al.  A comparison of the predictive validity of assessment center evaluations versus traditional measures in forecasting supervisory job performance: Interpretive implications of criterion distortion for the assessment paradigm. , 1984 .

[21]  Paul R. Sackett,et al.  Constructs and assessment center dimensions: Some troubling empirical findings , 1982 .

[22]  C G Thornton,et al.  Assessment Center and managerial performance , 1982 .

[23]  Stephen G. West,et al.  Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis , 1982 .

[24]  R. Reilly,et al.  VALIDITY AND FAIRNESS OF SOME ALTERNATIVE EMPLOYEE SELECTION PROCEDURES , 1982 .

[25]  George C. Thornton,et al.  PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF SELF-APPRAISALS OF JOB PERFORMANCE , 1980 .

[26]  D. Marlowe,et al.  The Approval Motive: Studies in Evaluative Dependence , 1980 .

[27]  Jeffrey S. Kane,et al.  Methods of peer assessment. , 1978 .

[28]  A. Denisi,et al.  Investigation of the uses of self-reports of abilities. , 1977 .

[29]  R. Klimoski,et al.  ASSESSMENT CENTERS—VALID OR MERELY PRESCIENT , 1977 .

[30]  Mary L. Tenopyr,et al.  CONTENT?CONSTRUCT CONFUSION , 1977 .

[31]  H. Markus.  Self-schemata and processing information about the self. , 1977 .

[32]  A. Lewin,et al.  Peer Nominations: A Model, Literature Critique and a Paradigm for Research. , 1976 .

[33]  James O. Mitchel.  Assessment center validity: A longitudinal study. , 1975 .

[34]  Michael J. Kavanagh,et al.  Issues in managerial performance: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of ratings. , 1971 .

[35]  Abraham K. Korman,et al.  THE PREDICTION OF MANAGERIAL PERFORMANCE: A REVIEW , 1968 .

[36]  E. Lawler,et al.  The multitrait-multirater approach to measuring managerial job performance. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  D. Bray,et al.  The assessment center in the measurement of potential for business management. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[38]  L. Siegel.  Davis Reading Test. , 1959 .

[39]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[40]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .