Error Effects in Anterior Cingulate Cortex Reverse when Error Likelihood Is High

Strong error-related activity in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) has been shown repeatedly with neuroimaging and event-related potential studies for the last several decades. Multiple theories have been proposed to account for error effects, including comparator models and conflict detection models, but the neural mechanisms that generate error signals remain in dispute. Typical studies use relatively low error rates, confounding the expectedness and the desirability of an error. Here we show with a gambling task and functional magnetic resonance imaging that when losses are more frequent than wins, the mPFC error effect disappears, and moreover, exhibits the opposite pattern by responding more strongly to unexpected wins than losses. These findings provide perspective on recent ERP studies and suggest that mPFC error effects result from a comparison between actual and expected outcomes.

[1]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to action: Willed and automatic control , 1980 .

[2]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior Technical Report No. 8006. , 1980 .

[3]  V. B. Brooks,et al.  ‘Error’ potentials in limbic cortex (anterior cingulate area 24) of monkeys during motor learning , 1986, Neuroscience Letters.

[4]  Derek W. Johnston,et al.  The relationship between cardiovascular responses in the laboratory and in the field. , 1990, Psychophysiology.

[5]  M. Posner,et al.  Localization of a Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1994 .

[6]  Peter Dayan,et al.  A Neural Substrate of Prediction and Reward , 1997, Science.

[7]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. , 1998, Science.

[8]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature.

[9]  A M Dale,et al.  Optimal experimental design for event‐related fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[10]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[11]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Error processing and the rostral anterior cingulate: an event-related fMRI study. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[12]  J Schlag,et al.  Reward-predicting and reward-detecting neuronal activity in the primate supplementary eye field. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  R. Knight,et al.  Prefrontal–cingulate interactions in action monitoring , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Coles,et al.  Performance monitoring in a confusing world: error-related brain activity, judgments of response accuracy, and types of errors. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  C. Ávila,et al.  The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray's anxiety and impulsivity dimensions. , 2001 .

[16]  Adrian R. Willoughby,et al.  The Medial Frontal Cortex and the Rapid Processing of Monetary Gains and Losses , 2002, Science.

[17]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[18]  Gregory G. Brown,et al.  Error Rate and Outcome Predictability Affect Neural Activation in Prefrontal Cortex and Anterior Cingulate during Decision-Making , 2002, NeuroImage.

[19]  B. Richmond,et al.  Anterior Cingulate: Single Neuronal Signals Related to Degree of Reward Expectancy , 2002, Science.

[20]  R Turner,et al.  Optimized EPI for fMRI studies of the orbitofrontal cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Temporal Difference Models and Reward-Related Learning in the Human Brain , 2003, Neuron.

[22]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Neuronal Correlates of Goal-Based Motor Selection in the Prefrontal Cortex , 2003, Science.

[23]  Joshua W. Brown,et al.  Performance Monitoring by the Anterior Cingulate Cortex During Saccade Countermanding , 2003, Science.

[24]  I. Erev,et al.  Small feedback‐based decisions and their limited correspondence to description‐based decisions , 2003 .

[25]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Errors in reward prediction are re£ected in the event-related brain potential , 2003 .

[26]  Phan Luu,et al.  The Anterior Cingulate Cortex : Regulating Actions in Context , 2004 .

[27]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Motor Learning and Memory for Reaching and Pointing , 2004 .

[28]  E. Weber,et al.  Predicting Risk-Sensitivity in Humans and Lower Animals: Risk as Variance or Coefficient of Variation , 2004, Psychological review.

[29]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice , 2004, Psychological science.

[30]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. , 2004, Psychological review.

[31]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[32]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  A mechanism for error detection in speeded response time tasks. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  Joshua W. Brown,et al.  Learned Predictions of Error Likelihood in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex , 2005, Science.

[34]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  Marc A Schuckit,et al.  Neural activation patterns of methamphetamine-dependent subjects during decision making predict relapse. , 2005, Archives of general psychiatry.

[36]  B. Burle,et al.  Sequential compatibility effects and cognitive control: does conflict really matter? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  John J. Foxe,et al.  The Anterior Cingulate and Error Avoidance , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Mark V. Albert,et al.  Anticipation of conflict monitoring in the anterior cingulate cortex and the prefrontal cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Reward prediction error signals associated with a modified time estimation task. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[40]  David Goodman,et al.  Performance Monitoring in the Anterior Cingulate is Not All Error Related: Expectancy Deviation and the Representation of Action-Outcome Associations , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  E. Phelps,et al.  Neural mechanisms mediating optimism bias , 2007, Nature.

[42]  Joshua W. Brown,et al.  Risk prediction and aversion by anterior cingulate cortex , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[43]  Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al.  Learning the value of information in an uncertain world , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  T. Braver,et al.  Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. , 2007 .

[45]  Marco Steinhauser,et al.  Modeling behavioral measures of error detection in choice tasks: response monitoring versus conflict monitoring. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  E. Aarts,et al.  Anticipatory activity in anterior cingulate cortex can be independent of conflict and error likelihood. , 2008, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[47]  L. Fellows,et al.  Dorsal Medial Prefrontal Cortex Plays a Necessary Role in Rapid Error Prediction in Humans , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  Ryan K. Jessup,et al.  Feedback Produces Divergence From Prospect Theory in Descriptive Choice , 2008, Psychological science.

[49]  Borís Burle,et al.  Error Negativity Does Not Reflect Conflict: A Reappraisal of Conflict Monitoring and Anterior Cingulate Cortex Activity , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  P. Haggard.  Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[51]  Joshua W. Brown,et al.  Conflict effects without conflict in anterior cingulate cortex: Multiple response effects and context specific representations , 2009, NeuroImage.