Linking Community and Ecosystem Processes: The Role of Minor Species

The link between species and ecosystem functioning is a central issue in ecology. In natural plant communities, the dominant species determine most of the productivity-related processes but what is the function of minor species? A recent hypothesis suggests that after disturbance, minor species facilitate the recruitment and abundance of dominants during re-colonization, thus indirectly determining ecosystem function. We tested this hypothesis using a long-term dataset of annual plant communities in a semiarid shrubland by comparing plant density and biomass from plots in which all vegetation had been removed; plots from which only the dominant (the annual grass Stipa capensis) had been removed, and control plots. In the absence of vegetation, the dominant failed to re-establish during the following growing season. After being removed the dominant re-established similarly to the controls. An ant exclosure experiment excluded the possibility that this was due to seed predation. In an experiment with individual dispersal units of S. capensis, we demonstrated the mechanism by which minor species can control the dominant’s abundance. Minor species indirectly govern ecosystem processes by providing structures facilitating seed soil penetration and thus recruitment of the dominant.

[1]  R. H. Whittaker,et al.  Dominance and Diversity in Land Plant Communities , 1965, Science.

[2]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments , 2001, Nature.

[3]  L. Aarssen High productivity in grassland ecosystems : effected by species diversity or productive species ? , 1997 .

[4]  M. Zobel,et al.  The relative of species pools in determining plant species richness: an alternative explanation of species coexistence? , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  L. Walker,et al.  Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities , 1997 .

[6]  B. Worm,et al.  Biodiversity, productivity and stability in real food webs , 2003 .

[7]  Moshe Shachak,et al.  Harvester ant response to spatial and temporal heterogeneity in seed availability: pattern in the process of granivory , 2000, Oecologia.

[8]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology , 1992 .

[9]  A. Kinzig,et al.  Original Articles: Plant Attribute Diversity, Resilience, and Ecosystem Function: The Nature and Significance of Dominant and Minor Species , 1999, Ecosystems.

[10]  John H. Lawton,et al.  What Do Species Do in Ecosystems , 1994 .

[11]  B. Boeken,et al.  The dynamics of abundance and incidence of annual plant species during colonization in a desert , 1998 .

[12]  Amy J. Symstad,et al.  Functional diversity revealed by removal experiments , 2003 .

[13]  E. Zaady,et al.  Environmental factors affecting dispersal, germination and distribution of Stipa capensis in the Negev Desert, Israel , 2004, Ecological Research.

[14]  J. Lawton,et al.  Linking Species and Ecosystems , 1996 .

[15]  Margaret A. Palmer,et al.  Species diversity enhances ecosystem functioning through interspecific facilitation , 2002, Nature.

[16]  M. Shachak,et al.  Colonization by annual plants of an experimentally altered desert landscape: source—sink relationships , 1998 .

[17]  R. Prasse,et al.  Effect of microbiotic soil surface crusts on emergence of vascular plants , 2000, Plant Ecology.

[18]  D. Hooper THE ROLE OF COMPLEMENTARITY AND COMPETITION IN ECOSYSTEM RESPONSES TO VARIATION IN PLANT DIVERSITY , 1998 .

[19]  Eliahu Stern,et al.  Atlas of the Negev , 1989 .

[20]  Shahid Naeem,et al.  Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability , 1997, Nature.

[21]  P. Reich,et al.  The Influence of Functional Diversity and Composition on Ecosystem Processes , 1997 .

[22]  Michael A. Huston,et al.  Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity , 1997, Oecologia.

[23]  B. Boeken The effect of plant litter on ecosystem properties in a Mediterranean semi-arid shrubland , 2001 .

[24]  A. Knapp,et al.  Dominant species maintain ecosystem function with non‐random species loss , 2003 .

[25]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  S. Pickett,et al.  Role of resources and disturbance in the organization of an old-field plant community. , 1990 .

[27]  M. Shachak,et al.  Desert Plant Communities in Human-Made Patches--Implications for Management , 1994 .

[28]  Jason D. Hoeksema,et al.  Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology , 2000, Oecologia.

[29]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  The interplay of facilitation and competition in plant communities , 1997 .

[30]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects , 1998 .

[31]  Moshe Shachak,et al.  Ecosystem Management of Desertified Shrublands in Israel , 1998, Ecosystems.