In vitro optical quality measurements of three intraocular lens models having identical platform

BackgroundWith recent advances in technology and introduction of new intraocular lens (IOL) models, surgeons today have the opportunity to choose from various optical designs, which can influence the postoperative quality of vision. In our laboratory study, we compared the optical quality of three different IOLs that use the identical platform and are produced by the same manufacturer. The study included two diffractive multifocal IOLs, a bifocal and a trifocal one, as well as a monofocal IOL.MethodsThree IOL models: monofocal CT ASPHINA 409 M, diffractive bifocal AT LISA 809 M, and diffractive trifocal AT LISA Tri 839MP (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Germany) were assessed for optical quality by measuring modulation transfer function (MTF) and Strehl Ratio (SR) values at pupil sizes of 3.0 and 4.5 mm on the OptiSpheric® IOL PRO (Trioptics GmbH, Germany). The United States Air Force (USAF) Target images were also recorded to comfirm the optical performance qualitatively.ResultsFor far focus at 50 lp/mm and 3.0 mm pupil size, MTF value of the monofocal lens (MTF = 0.798) was 1.8-fold and 2.1-fold better than the bifocal (MTF = 0.446) and the trifocal (MTF = 0.382) IOLs, respectively. For near focus, bifocal IOL (MTF = 0.265) was 1.4-fold better than trifocal IOL (MTF = 0.187), while for intermediate focus, the trifocal IOL (MTF = 0.148) was 1.7-fold better than the bifocal IOL (MTF = 0.086). For the same pupil size, total sum of light loss amounted to 5.2% for the monofocal, 16.0% for the bifocal and 6.0% for the trifocal IOL. For a larger pupil, the amount of light loss increased significantly for the multifocal IOLs.ConclusionsThe monofocal IOL performed the best for far, the bifocal IOL for near and the trifocal IOL for intermediate focus. While the monofocal IOL created the least amount of light loss for both pupil sizes, the trifocal IOL created less than half the amount of light loss than the bifocal IOL for small pupil. For large pupil, however, less light scatter was observed for the bifocal than the trifocal IOL.

[1]  Damien Gatinel,et al.  Design and qualification of a diffractive trifocal optical profile for intraocular lenses , 2011, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[2]  Thomas Kohnen,et al.  Effect of intraocular lens asphericity on quality of vision after cataract removal: an intraindividual comparison. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[3]  José M Artigas,et al.  Image quality with multifocal intraocular lenses and the effect of pupil size: Comparison of refractive and hybrid refractive–diffractive designs , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[4]  Cem Mesçi,et al.  Differences in contrast sensitivity between monofocal, multifocal and accommodating intraocular lenses: long‐term results , 2010, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[5]  S. Lane,et al.  Performance of presbyopia‐correcting intraocular lenses in distance optical bench tests , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[6]  S. Pieh,et al.  Comparison of pseudoaccommodation and visual quality between a diffractive and refractive multifocal intraocular lens , 1998, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[7]  D. Pascolini,et al.  Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010 , 2011, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[8]  Henk Weeber,et al.  Visualization of the retinal image in an eye model with spherical and aspheric, diffractive, and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. , 2008, Journal of refractive surgery.

[9]  Wilhelm Stork,et al.  Imaging quality of intraocular lenses , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[10]  R. Scott,et al.  Long-Term Results , 2001 .

[11]  A Lang,et al.  Interpreting multifocal intraocular lens modulation transfer functions , 1993, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  Mats Lundström,et al.  Evidence-based guidelines for cataract surgery: guidelines based on data in the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery database. , 2012, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[13]  M. Mainster,et al.  The effect of chromatic dispersion on pseudophakic optical performance , 2007, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[14]  Paolo Sirotti,et al.  Analysis of the optical quality of intraocular lenses. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  M. Leyland,et al.  Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[16]  M. Leyland,et al.  Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[17]  Susana Marcos,et al.  Image Quality of the Human Eye , 2003, International ophthalmology clinics.

[18]  R. Montés-Micó,et al.  In vitro optical quality differences between multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lenses , 2013, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[19]  T Kohnen,et al.  [Apodized diffractive optic. New concept in multifocal lens technology]. , 2007, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[20]  Warren E Hill,et al.  Optical bench performance of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR®, AT LISA® tri, and FineVision® intraocular lenses , 2014, Clinical ophthalmology.

[21]  E. Marques,et al.  Comparison of visual outcomes of 2 diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses , 2015, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[22]  J. García-Feijóo,et al.  Evaluation of image quality after implantation of 2 diffractive multifocal intraocular lens models , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[23]  N Hirayama,et al.  Effect of chromatic aberration on contrast sensitivity in pseudophakic eyes. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[24]  Wilhelm Stork,et al.  In vitro strehl ratios with spherical, aberration-free, average, and customized spherical aberration-correcting intraocular lenses. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  Stephen A. Burns,et al.  A new approach to the study of ocular chromatic aberrations , 1999, Vision Research.

[26]  Robert Montés-Micó,et al.  Optical performance of two new trifocal intraocular lenses: through‐focus modulation transfer function and influence of pupil size , 2014, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[27]  Gary C. Brown,et al.  The quality of life associated with presbyopia. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[28]  H. Kaymak,et al.  Functional outcomes after implantation of Tecnis ZM900 and Array SA40 multifocal intraocular lenses , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[29]  Jorge L Alió,et al.  Outcomes of a new diffractive trifocal intraocular lens , 2014, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.