Analysis and optimization of the use of CHP–ORC systems for small commercial buildings

Abstract The use of combined heating and power (CHP) systems is increasing rapidly due to their high potential of reducing primary energy consumption (PEC), cost, and carbon dioxide emissions (CDE). These reductions are mainly due to capturing the exhaust heat to satisfy the thermal demand of a building. However, when the CHP system is operated following the electric load, the recovered exhaust heat may or may not be sufficient to satisfy the thermal demand of the facility. When the recovered exhaust heat is more than the heat required, the excess is usually discarded to the atmosphere. An organic rankine cycle (ORC) can be used to recover the surplus exhaust heat to generate extra electricity. Therefore, combining the ORC system with the CHP system (CHP–ORC) reduces the electricity that has to be produced by the CHP system, thereby reducing the total PEC, cost, and CDE. The objective of this paper is to study the energetic, economical, and environmental performance of a combined CHP–ORC system and compare its performance to a standalone CHP system and a reference building for different climate zones. A comparison of a CHP–ORC system operating 24 h with a system operating during typical office hours is also performed.

[1]  Yi Jiang,et al.  Energy utilization evaluation of CCHP systems , 2006 .

[2]  Antonio Piacentino,et al.  A methodology for sizing a trigeneration plant in mediterranean areas , 2003 .

[3]  Louay M. Chamra,et al.  Cost-optimized real-time operation of CHP systems , 2009 .

[4]  P. Torcellini,et al.  DOE Commercial Building Benchmark Models , 2008 .

[5]  J. Khan,et al.  Modeling and optimization of a novel pressurized CHP system with water extraction and refrigeration , 2008 .

[6]  Carlo Roselli,et al.  Experimental analysis of micro-cogeneration units based on reciprocating internal combustion engine , 2006 .

[7]  Antonio Piacentino,et al.  A new approach to exergoeconomic analysis and design of variable demand energy systems , 2006 .

[8]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  Thermoeconomic modeling of micro‐CHP (micro‐cooling, heating, and power) for small commercial applications , 2008 .

[9]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  Second Law Analysis and Optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle , 2006 .

[10]  Jia-cong Cao,et al.  Simulation and optimization of the performance in the air-conditioning season of a BCHP system in China , 2008 .

[11]  Isabel Malico,et al.  Design of a trigeneration system using a high‐temperature fuel cell , 2009 .

[12]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  An examination of regenerative organic Rankine cycles using dry fluids , 2008 .

[13]  Jiangfeng Wang,et al.  Parametric optimization and comparative study of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for low grade waste heat recovery , 2009 .

[14]  Nelson Fumo,et al.  Hybrid-cooling, combined cooling, heating, and power systems , 2009 .

[15]  Andreas Schuster,et al.  Energetic and economic investigation of Organic Rankine Cycle applications , 2009 .

[16]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  Analysis and optimization of CCHP systems based on energy, economical, and environmental considerations , 2009 .

[17]  D. Sánchez,et al.  Alternative ORC bottoming cycles FOR combined cycle power plants , 2009 .

[18]  Jameel R. Khan.  Modeling and experimentation of a novel pressurized CHP system with water extraction , 2008 .

[19]  Hongbo Ren,et al.  Economic and environmental evaluation of micro CHP systems with different operating modes for residential buildings in Japan , 2010 .

[20]  P. Mago,et al.  Performance analysis of different working fluids for use in organic Rankine cycles , 2007 .

[21]  I. Obernberger,et al.  Description and evaluation of the new 1,000 kWel organic rankine cycle process integrated in the biomass CHP plant in Lienz, Austria , 2002 .

[22]  Nelson Fumo,et al.  Performance analysis of CCHP and CHP systems operating following the thermal and electric load , 2009 .