An interactive race model of divided attention.

Two classes of models have been proposed to explain how redundant information extracted from separate sources comes to activate a single response. Each provides a fundamentally different account of why responses to redundant signals are typically faster than those to either signal alone (the redundant-signals effect). Independent race models assume that a race occurs between perceptual codes on independent channels and that only the winner activates the response. Coactivation models assume that there is some form of energy or activation-strength summation, with information being pooled across channels prior to decision. An intermediate class of models is introduced and a specific exemplar, the interactive race model, is tested in a series of redundant-target detection experiments. In particular, we examine the effects on performance of two types of contingency that have previously been overlooked as sources of task-relevant information. The results reveal that response times are significantly influenced by both interstimulus and stimulus-response contingencies. The interactive race model provides a natural account of these findings as well as several otherwise puzzling results in the divided-attention literature. Language: en

[1]  G. T. Gardner Evidence for independent parallel channels in tachistoscopic perception , 1973 .

[2]  H Pashler,et al.  Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  H. Colonius Possibly dependent probability summation of reaction time , 1990 .

[4]  R Ulrich,et al.  Separate-activation models with variable base times: Testability and checking of cross-channel dependency , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Marilyn L Shaw,et al.  Attending to multiple sources of information: I. The integration of information in decision making , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[7]  Brian H. Ross,et al.  On appropriate procedures for combining probability distributions within the same family , 1980 .

[8]  J. Yellott Correction for fast guessing and the speed-accuracy tradeoff in choice reaction time , 1971 .

[9]  G Wolford,et al.  Perturbation model for letter identification. , 1975, Psychological review.

[10]  H Colonius,et al.  Measuring channel dependence in separate activation models , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  R. Ratcliff Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  M. Mozer Letter migration in word perception. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  D. Meyer,et al.  The point of no return in choice reaction time: controlled and ballistic stages of response preparation. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  C Bundesen,et al.  Visual attention: Race models for selection from multielement displays , 1987, Psychological research.

[15]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information , 1984 .

[16]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[17]  C W Eriksen,et al.  A source of error in attempts to distinguish coactivation from separate activation in the perception of redundant targets , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Marilyn L. Shaw,et al.  A capacity allocation model for reaction time. , 1978 .

[19]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  H Colonius,et al.  Modeling the redundant signals effect by specifying the hazard function , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  H. Pashler Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  W. R. Garner Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts , 1975 .

[23]  W. K. Estes Similarity-related channel interactions in visual processing. , 1982 .

[24]  J. Duncan The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980 .

[25]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Response latency in visual search with redundancy in the visual display , 1974 .

[26]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[27]  R. Ollman Fast guesses in choice reaction time , 1966 .

[28]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Dependent spatial channels in visual processing , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  S. Ross A First Course in Probability , 1977 .

[30]  G R Grice,et al.  Absence of a redundant-signals effect in a reaction time task with divided attention , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[32]  William Prinzmetal,et al.  Perceptual capacity limits in visual detection and search , 1983 .

[33]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Locus of the stimulus probability effect , 1973 .

[34]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[35]  J. Theios,et al.  Memory scanning as a serial self-terminating process , 1973 .

[36]  R. Wallace,et al.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  D. Broadbent Task combination and selective intake of information. , 1982, Acta psychologica.

[38]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Structure of Attentional Resources , 1980 .

[39]  J. A. Kleiss,et al.  Locus and persistence of capacity limitations in visual information processing. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  A. H. C. Heijden,et al.  Some evidence for correlated separate activation in a simple letter-detection task , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  Steven W. Keele,et al.  Attention and human performance , 1973 .

[42]  John I. Yellott,et al.  Correction for guessing in choice reaction time , 1967 .

[43]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[44]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .

[45]  D. Raab DIVISION OF PSYCHOLOGY: STATISTICAL FACILITATION OF SIMPLE REACTION TIMES* , 1962 .

[46]  R M Mulligan,et al.  Multimodal signal detection: Independent decisions vs. integration , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Discrete and continuous models of human information processing: theoretical distinctions and empirical results. , 1988, Acta psychologica.

[48]  J. Miller Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: in search of partial output. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  R. A. Kinchla,et al.  Detecting a target letter in briefly presented arrays: A confidence rating analysis in terms of a weighted additive effects model , 1974 .

[50]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[51]  Grice Gr,et al.  Stimulus intensity and response evocation. , 1968 .

[52]  James L. McClelland On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[53]  A Treisman,et al.  Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[54]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The cost of visual filtering. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  A. H. C. van der Heijden,et al.  Some evidence for a limited capacity parallel selfterminating process in simple visual search tasks , 1975 .

[56]  Hans Colonius,et al.  Intersensory facilitation in the motor component? , 1987 .

[57]  W Schwarz,et al.  A new model to explain the redundant-signals effect , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[58]  E. G. J. Eijkman,et al.  Distributions of simple RT with single and double stimuli , 1977 .

[59]  J Miller,et al.  Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[60]  J R Simon,et al.  Processing symbolic information from a visual display: interference from an irrelevant directional cue. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[61]  Robert Nullmeyer,et al.  Application of variable criterion theory to choice reaction time , 1977 .

[62]  P. Fitts,et al.  S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[63]  D. Meyer,et al.  Temporal properties of human information processing: Tests of discrete versus continuous models , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[64]  D E Meyer,et al.  Dynamics of activation in semantic and episodic memory. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[65]  G. Grice,et al.  Dependence of target redundancy effects on noise conditions and number of targets , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[66]  G R Grice,et al.  Combination rule for redundant information in reaction time tasks with divided attention , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[67]  A. H. C. Heijden,et al.  Parallel processing of redundant targets in simple visual search tasks , 1983, Psychological research.

[68]  D. Broadbent Perception and communication , 1958 .