Performance analysis of carrier aggregation for various mobile network implementations scenario based on spectrum allocated

Carrier Aggregation (CA) is one of the Long Term Evolution Advanced (LTE-A) features that allow mobile network operators (MNO) to combine multiple component carriers (CCs) across the available spectrum to create a wider bandwidth channel for increasing the network data throughput and overall capacity. CA has a potential to enhance data rates and network performance in the downlink, uplink, or both, and it can support aggregation of frequency division duplexing (FDD) as well as time division duplexing (TDD). The technique enables the MNO to exploit fragmented spectrum allocations and can be utilized to aggregate licensed and unlicensed carrier spectrum as well. This paper analyzes the performance gains and complexity level that arises from the aggregation of three inter-band component carriers (3CC) as compared to the aggregation of 2CC using a Vienna LTE System Level simulator. The results show a considerable growth in the average cell throughput when 3CC aggregations are implemented over the 2CC aggregation, at the expense of reduction in the fairness index. The reduction in the fairness index implies that, the scheduler has an increased task in resource allocations due to the added component carrier. Compensating for such decrease in the fairness index could result into scheduler design complexity. The proposed scheme can be adopted in combining various component carriers, to increase the bandwidth and hence the data rates.

[1]  Kamran Etemad,et al.  Carrier aggregation framework in 3GPP LTE-advanced [WiMAX/LTE Update] , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Changchuan Yin,et al.  Reduced-Complexity Proportional Fair Scheduling for OFDMA Systems , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Communications, Circuits and Systems.

[3]  Jon M. Peha,et al.  Impact of spectrum aggregation technology and frequency on cellular networks performance , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN).

[4]  Yoshihisa Kishiyama,et al.  Experimental Evaluation on Throughput Performance of Asymmetric Carrier Aggregation in LTE-Advanced , 2011, 2011 IEEE 73rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[5]  Bouallegue Ridha,et al.  Dynamic Optimization of Overlap-and-add Length over Mimo Mbofdm System Based on Snr and Cir Estimate , 2015 .

[6]  Aleksi Tanner.  LTE-A 3CC Carrier Aggregation , 2016 .

[7]  Bikramjit Singh,et al.  Co-primary inter-operator spectrum sharing over a limited spectrum pool using repeated games , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[8]  Li Chen,et al.  Analysis and Simulation for Spectrum Aggregation in LTE-Advanced System , 2009, 2009 IEEE 70th Vehicular Technology Conference Fall.

[9]  M. H. Habaebi,et al.  Carrier aggregation in Long Term Evolution-Advanced , 2012, 2012 IEEE Control and System Graduate Research Colloquium.

[10]  Anael Sam,et al.  A Price Based Spectrum Sharing Scheme in Wireless Cellular Networks , 2013 .

[11]  Raj Jain,et al.  A Quantitative Measure Of Fairness And Discrimination For Resource Allocation In Shared Computer Systems , 1998, ArXiv.

[12]  Hsuan-Jung Su,et al.  LTE-Advanced heterogeneous networks: Release 10 and beyond , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[13]  Zhu Han,et al.  Carrier Aggregation Between Operators in Next Generation Cellular Networks: A Stable Roommate Market , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[14]  Samra Mujacic,et al.  Enhanced MIMO Influence on LTE-Advanced Network Performances , 2016 .

[15]  Ramaswami Murugesh,et al.  A Study on Quantitative Parameters of Spectrum Handoff in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2017 .

[16]  M. F. Ghanim,et al.  Effective Carrier Aggregation on the LTE-Advanced Systems , 2012 .

[17]  M. Ismail,et al.  Capacity evaluation of Carrier Aggregation techniques in LTE-Advanced system , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering (ICCCE).