Variant Combination of Multiple Classifiers Methods for Classifying the EEG Signals in Brain-Computer Interface

Controlling the environment with EEG signals is known as brain computer interface is the new subject researchers are interested in. The aim in such systems is to control the machine without using muscle, and we should control the machine using signals recorded from the surface of the cortex. In this project our focus is on pattern recognition phase in which we use multiple classifier fusion to improve the classification accuracy. We have applied various feature extraction methods and combined their results. Two methods, greedy algorithms and genetic algorithms, are used for selecting the pair feature extractor-classifier (we called expert) between the existed pair. Experiments show that with using some combination method such as majority vote, product, mean, median we have obtained better result than best existing result and Fuzzy integral method and decision template have shown the similar result with the best result in BCI competition 2003 [15].

[1]  Jean-Luc Marichal,et al.  An axiomatic approach of the discrete Choquet integral as a tool to aggregate interacting criteria , 2000, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[2]  Mohamed S. Kamel,et al.  Multi-classification techniques applied to EMG signal decomposition , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583).

[3]  菅野 道夫,et al.  Theory of fuzzy integrals and its applications , 1975 .

[4]  John Platt,et al.  Probabilistic Outputs for Support vector Machines and Comparisons to Regularized Likelihood Methods , 1999 .

[5]  Robert P. W. Duin,et al.  The combining classifier: to train or not to train? , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[6]  Z. Keirn,et al.  Man-machine communications through brain-wave processing , 1990, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[7]  Barak A. Pearlmutter,et al.  Linear Spatial Integration for Single-Trial Detection in Encephalography , 2002, NeuroImage.

[8]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  The BCI competition 2003: progress and perspectives in detection and discrimination of EEG single trials , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  P. Gader,et al.  Advances in fuzzy integration for pattern recognition , 1994, CVPR 1994.

[10]  James M. Keller,et al.  Training the fuzzy integral , 1996, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[11]  Mohamed S. Kamel,et al.  Data Dependence in Combining Classifiers , 2003, Multiple Classifier Systems.

[12]  James M. Keller,et al.  Information fusion in computer vision using the fuzzy integral , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[13]  Dr. D. Stashuk,et al.  Robust supervised classification of motor unit action potentials , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[14]  Håkan Johansson,et al.  Modern Techniques in Neuroscience Research , 1999, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[15]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[16]  J.-M. Vesin,et al.  Classification of EEG signals in the ambiguity domain for brain computer interface applications , 2002, 2002 14th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing Proceedings. DSP 2002 (Cat. No.02TH8628).

[17]  C.W. Anderson,et al.  Comparison of linear, nonlinear, and feature selection methods for EEG signal classification , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[18]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Linear and nonlinear methods for brain-computer interfaces , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  Bernadette Bouchon-Meunier,et al.  Towards general measures of comparison of objects , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[20]  Ludmila I. Kuncheva,et al.  "Fuzzy" versus "nonfuzzy" in combining classifiers designed by Boosting , 2003, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..