Improving e-learning communities through optimal composition of multidisciplinary learning groups

The current study proposes an intelligent approach to compose optimal learning groups in which the members have different domain backgrounds. The approach is based on a well-known evolutionary algorithm - Particle Swarm Optimization. The authors claim that quantifying various indicators, such as background diversity and similarity between the type of interest of the participants, within a group and between groups can positively impact on building learning groups. The algorithm is integrated in an ontology-based e-learning system, designed to create self-built educating communities, in which a trainees goes through the education process, gains points through achievements and ultimately becomes a trainer. When creating a new account, the newly created trainee is asked to self asses himself by filling out a form. The resulting profile is used to assign the user to the most suitable learning group. We propose to assign him by the following rule: maximizing the diversity within a group (due to the fact that multidisciplinary teams are more challenging) and minimizing the diversity between groups (all the groups should have similar composition), meaning a group will have members with similar interests. The study is presented in the context of group building strategies in adults' education.

[1]  Elsa Fontainha,et al.  Communities of Practice and Virtual Learning Communities: Benefits, Barriers and Success Factors , 2007 .

[2]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[3]  Linda Polin,et al.  Online Learning Communities: Common Ground and Critical Differences in Designing Technical Environments , 2004 .

[4]  C. Bodea,et al.  How e-Learning Experience Enhances the Social Presence in Community of Practice: An Empirical Analysis , 2012 .

[5]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  Applying the genetic encoded conceptual graph to grouping learning , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  Andrew J. Chipperfield,et al.  Simplifying Particle Swarm Optimization , 2010, Appl. Soft Comput..

[7]  Ronghuai Huang,et al.  Toward a Semantic Forum for Active Collaborative Learning , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[8]  Noriko Hara,et al.  IT Supports for Communities of Practice: An Empirically-based Framework , 2002 .

[9]  Mitsuru Ikeda,et al.  Design and Analysis of Learners' Interaction based on Collaborative Learning Ontology , 2001 .

[10]  Mitsuru Ikeda,et al.  An ontology engineering approach to the realization of theory-driven group formation , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[11]  E. Dale Audio-visual methods in teaching , 1946 .

[12]  Liana Razmerita,et al.  Collaborative Learning in Heterogeneous Classes - Towards a Group Formation Methodology , 2011, CSEDU.

[13]  R. Slavin Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice , 1990 .

[14]  Pieter van Brakel Mentoring Doctoral Students within a Virtual Community of Practice - With Special Reference to Their Information Recording Behaviour , 2010 .

[15]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Supporting collaborative learning by matching human actors , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[16]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of practice: A brief introduction , 2009 .

[17]  Rose Dieng,et al.  O'CoP, an Ontology Dedicated to Communities of Practice , 2009, Networked Knowledge - Networked Media - Integrating Knowledge Management.

[18]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[19]  R. Bekele Computer-Assisted Learner Group Formation Based on Personality Traits , 2006 .

[20]  Sabine Graf,et al.  Forming Heterogeneous Groups for Intelligent Collaborative Learning Systems with Ant Colony Optimization , 2006, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[21]  K. Patricia Cross,et al.  Why Learning Communities? Why Now? , 1998 .

[22]  Bahar Baran,et al.  KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ONLINE COMMUNITIES OF PRACTICE IN TEACHER EDUCATION , 2006 .

[23]  Harith Alani,et al.  Identifying Communities of Practice through Ontology Network Analysis , 2003, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[24]  George Dragoi,et al.  VPN solutions and network monitoring to support virtual teams work in virtual enterprises , 2011, Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Vive S. Kumar,et al.  Assessing process in CSCL: An ontological approach , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  Stefan Gerry Johann Trausan-Matu,et al.  Supporting Polyphonic Collaborative Learning , 2007 .

[27]  Yueh-Min Huang,et al.  A Systematic Approach for Learner Group Composition Utilizing U-Learning Portfolio , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[28]  Craig Zimitat,et al.  Capturing community of practice knowledge for student learning , 2007 .

[29]  M. Felisa Verdejo,et al.  Applications of a Collaborative Learning Ontology , 2002, MICAI.

[30]  Ria Hanewald,et al.  Sustainability in an Online Community of Practice: the Case Study of a Group of Secondary School Educators in Victoria , 2009 .

[31]  David B. Mykota,et al.  Learner Characteristics as Predictors of Online Social Presence , 2007 .

[32]  Rob Kling,et al.  Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning: Introduction , 2004 .

[33]  Yen-Ting Lin,et al.  An automatic group composition system for composing collaborative learning groups using enhanced particle swarm optimization , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[34]  Zahide Yildirim,et al.  Communication Behaviors and Trust in Collaborative Online Teams , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[35]  M. Knowles,et al.  The Adult Learner , 2020, The Department Chair.

[36]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective , 2006 .