Wavelet-Based Detrending for EMG Noise Removal

Myoelectric Signals (MES) have a long traditionwith regard to prostheses control. Due to the signals' nature, MES are prone to interference and noise. Various methods existfor preprocessing these signals before classification algorithmsto derive control information are applied. While these methodshelp to improve the source signals, parameters must be carefullyselected and implemented on a case-to-case basis. After presentingseveral noise removal methods and drawbacks, we introduce anovel approach by applying wavelet detrending to the signal.The approach brought forward yields an excellent signal-to-noiseratio and provides in some cases a complete removal of noiseinterference. Weak signals and muscle fatigue do not impactthe results. Besides serving as input for various classificationmethods, the detrended signal can also be directly used forimplementing robust control methods like Cookie Crusher orthreshold algorithms. A basic Cookie Crusher control modelwas chosen to verify the approach in comparison to traditionalamplitude level schemes. Results show that detrended signal datacan be utilized for reliable prosthesis control even for usersexhibiting low amplitude MES.

[1]  G Papaioannou,et al.  WAVELETS AND SELF-ORGANISING MAPS IN ELECTROMYOGRAM (EMG) ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[2]  Ashok Muzumdar,et al.  Powered Upper Limb Prostheses , 2004, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[3]  N. M. SOBAHI,et al.  Denoising of EMG Signals Based on Wavelet Transform , 2011 .

[4]  E L Morin,et al.  Sampling, noise-reduction and amplitude estimation issues in surface electromyography. , 2002, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[5]  K. Englehart,et al.  Classification of the myoelectric signal using time-frequency based representations. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[6]  Jean-Louis Marty,et al.  Implementation of the Discrete Wavelet Transform Used in the Calibration of the Enzymatic Biosensors , 2011 .

[7]  Jean-Michel Poggi,et al.  Wavelets and their applications , 2007 .

[8]  Norali Ahmad Nasrul,et al.  Surface Electromyography signal processing and application: a review , 2009 .

[9]  Pornchai Phukpattaranont,et al.  A Novel Feature Extraction for Robust EMG Pattern Recognition , 2009, ArXiv.

[10]  .. S. Day Important Factors in surface EMG measurement By Dr , 2002 .

[11]  Farbod Fahimi,et al.  The Development of a Myoelectric Training Tool for Above-Elbow Amputees , 2012, The open biomedical engineering journal.

[12]  Andreas Attenberger,et al.  Modeling and Visualization of Classification-Based Control Schemes for Upper Limb Prostheses , 2012, 2012 IEEE 19th International Conference and Workshops on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems.

[13]  J. Kreifeldt Signal versus noise characteristics of filtered EMG used as a control source. , 1971, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[14]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[15]  S. T. Hamde,et al.  Estimation of ECG features using LabVIEW , 2009 .

[16]  Ashok Muzumdar Powered upper limb prostheses : control, implementation and clinical application , 2004 .

[17]  S. Qian Introduction to Time-Frequency and Wavelet Transforms , 2001 .

[18]  Mamun Bin Ibne Reaz,et al.  Denoising and analysis of surface EMG signals , 2006 .

[19]  C. J. Luca,et al.  SURFACE ELECTROMYOGRAPHY : DETECTION AND RECORDING , 2022 .

[20]  Courtney W. Moran,et al.  Revolutionizing Prosthetics 2009 Modular Prosthetic Limb – Body Interface : Overview of the Prosthetic Socket Development , 2011 .