Condition assessment for building stone conservation: a staging system approach

Abstract Trofimov and Phillips (Geomorphology 5 (1992) 203) suggest that the ultimate goal of any science is to predict the behaviour of entire systems. With regard to the decay of building stone, making accurate predictions of stone behaviour remains an elusive goal but given our improved understanding of decay dynamics it should be possible to provide a forecast of likely system behaviour. However, forecasting system behaviour requires classification of the system state with the classification, whether formal or informal, founded on knowledge of the factors that control response. In the context of building stone decay these controlling factors include, structural properties, mineralogical properties, inheritance effects, contaminant loading and natural change. In trying to formalise building stone condition assessment and incorporate a forecast component, an analogy can be made between the requirements for classification and treatment determination of cancer patients and the approach to condition assessment and conservation of stone structures. In medicine, one of the most widely used and refined patient assessment schemes is the TNM Staging System. The rationale underpinning the TNM Staging System has many similarities with approaches to building stone assessment in that it seeks to impose a more formal structure on condition assessment that provides a commonality of approach, language and meaning and a procedure for forecasting the extent of remedial intervention required and outcome in terms of ‘life expectancy’.

[1]  Bernd Fitzner,et al.  Damage index for stone monuments , 2002 .

[2]  Richard Laing,et al.  Maintenance and repair issues for stone cleaned sandstone and granite building façades , 2003 .

[3]  Bernard Smith,et al.  The possible role of clay minerals in salt weathering , 1984 .

[4]  Siegfried Siegesmund,et al.  Natural Stone, Weathering Phenomena, Conservation Strategies and Case Studies , 2003 .

[5]  Fulvio Zezza,et al.  Origin, mechanisms and effects of salts on degradation of monuments in marine and continental environments. Protection and Conservation of the European Cultural Heritage Research Report No. 4, Proceedings March 25-27 1996. Bari, Italy, January 1997 , 1997 .

[6]  S. Massa,et al.  A SYSTEM OF CLASSIFICATION OF THE DECAY OF STONE MONUMENTS , 1991 .

[7]  Martin E. Weaver,et al.  Stone Cleaning and the Nature, Soiling, and Decay Mechanisms of Stone , 1992 .

[8]  Tim Padfield,et al.  Science, Technology and European Cultural Heritage , 1992 .

[9]  B. Fitzner,et al.  Classification and mapping of weathering forms , 1992 .

[10]  Bernard Smith,et al.  Observations of three-dimensional salt distribution in building sandstone , 2000 .

[11]  Neville Agnew,et al.  Preserving the Laetoli Footprints , 1998 .

[12]  Bernd Fitzner,et al.  Damage diagnosis on stone monuments - weathering forms, damage categories and damage indices , 2001 .

[13]  Patricia Warke,et al.  Processes of Urban Stone Decay , 1996 .

[14]  Patricia Warke,et al.  Salt distribution in clay-rich weathered sandstone , 2000 .

[15]  Nicola Ashurst,et al.  Cleaning Historic Buildings , 1997 .

[16]  Jonathan D. Phillips,et al.  Theoretical and methodological premises of geomorphological forecasting , 1992 .

[17]  Eric Doehne,et al.  Stone Conservation: An Overview of Current Research , 1998 .