Age, Sex, and Cultural Differences in the Meaning and Dimensions of Achievement

The present study explored variations in the meaning and psychological dimensions of achievement among people of different ages, sexes, and cultures. Subjects were 504 British and Chinese males and females, aged 13 to 55. The repertory grid technique was used to elicit success situations and related constructs. A group grid was then constructed and administered to the subjects. Results revealed two major types of achievement situations (affiliative and individualistic/competitive) and three major dimensions of achievement (outcome/emotional state, instrumental activity, and causal attributions). Although these dimensions were the same for all, significant differences were found between groups on importance attached to success situations. The results are discussed in terms of sociocultural, situational, and developmental factors.

[1]  S. Bem.  The measurement of psychological androgyny. , 1974, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[2]  D. Kipnis.  Inner Direction, Other Direction and Achievement Motivation , 1974 .

[3]  R. L. Klein.  Age, sex, and task difficulty as predictors of social conformity. , 1972, Journal of gerontology.

[4]  F. Salili,et al.  Teachers' Evaluative Behavior , 1989 .

[5]  Irene Hanson Frieze,et al.  Assessing the theoretical models for sex differences in causal attributions for success and failure , 1982 .

[6]  S. Chown,et al.  Age and the rigidities. , 1961, Journal of gerontology.

[7]  M. Paludi.  Sociopsychological and Structural Factors Related to Women's Vocational Development , 1990 .

[8]  K. Hau,et al.  Examination Result Attribution, Expectancy and Achievement Goals among Chinese Students in Hong Kong∗ , 1990 .

[9]  A. H. Stein,et al.  The socialization of achievement orientation in females. , 1973 .

[10]  Subjective meaning of success in high and low achievers , 1988 .

[11]  Joan G. Miller.  Early Cross-Cultural Commonalities in Social Explanation. , 1986 .

[12]  J. Veroff.  Process vs. Impact in Men's and Women's Achievement Motivation∗ , 1977 .

[13]  G. Gurin,et al.  The use of thematic apperception to assess motivation in a nationwide interview study. , 1960 .

[14]  C. Hui.  Measurement of individualism-collectivism , 1988 .

[15]  J. Veroff,et al.  Motives in American Men and Women across the Adult Life Span. , 1984 .

[16]  J. Nicholls.  Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. , 1984 .

[17]  W. Gaeddert.  Sex and sex role effects on achievement strivings: Dimensions of similarity and difference , 1985 .

[18]  Lawrence Holpp.  Achievement motivation and kaizen , 1989 .

[19]  D. Ho,et al.  Intergenerational comparisons of child-rearing attitudes and practices in Hong Kong. , 1984 .

[20]  M. Maehr,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Exploration Into the Meaning of Achievement , 1983 .

[21]  P. Leung,et al.  Common adolescent problems in Hong Kong: their relationship with self-esteem, locus of control, intelligence and family environment , 1986 .

[22]  David C. McClelland,et al.  How Do Self-Attributed and Implicit Motives Differ?. , 1989 .