Numerical prediction of fracture in the Taylor test

Abstract A flat-nosed cylinder moving at a sufficiently high impact velocity in the classical Taylor test will always fracture. In this paper, fracture phenomena and fracture mechanisms in the Taylor test are investigated numerically based on a recently developed ductile fracture locus with the cut-off value for the negative stress triaxiality at −1/3. The impact velocity of the projectile ranges from 240 m/s to 600 m/s. The lower velocity is applied to a less ductile 2024-T351 aluminum alloy cylinder while the higher velocity is introduced for more ductile Weldox 460 E steel. Three distinct fracture modes are recreated numerically: the confined fracture inside the cylinder, the shear cracking on the lateral surface, and the petalling, all of which are consistent with experimental results presented in the open literature. It is found that a more ductile cylinder tends to fail by petalling while a less ductile one by shear cracking. Confined fracture is a common failure mode for both materials, which occurs in a wide range of the impact velocity. The ductile fracture criterion with the cut-off value predicts realistic fracture patterns for short cylinders deforming predominantly under compression.

[1]  K. Thoma,et al.  A modified TAYLOR-test in combination with numerical simulations - a new approach for the determination of model parameters under dynamic loads , 2003 .

[2]  Geoffrey Ingram Taylor,et al.  The use of flat-ended projectiles for determining dynamic yield stress I. Theoretical considerations , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[3]  J. N. Johnson,et al.  The effect of void growth on Taylor cylinder impact experiments , 1993 .

[4]  Tomasz Wierzbicki,et al.  EFFECT OF FRACTURE CRITERIA ON HIGH VELOCITY PERFORATION OF THIN BEAMS , 2004 .

[5]  M. Langseth,et al.  Numerical simulation of plugging failure in ballistic penetration , 2001 .

[6]  Odd Sture Hopperstad,et al.  On the influence of stress triaxiality and strain rate on the behaviour of a structural steel. Part II. Numerical study , 2003 .

[7]  T. Børvik,et al.  On the influence of stress triaxiality and strain rate on the behaviour of a structural steel. Part I. Experiments , 2003 .

[8]  R. J. Pick,et al.  Void growth and coalescence during high velocity impact , 1995 .

[9]  F. A. McClintock,et al.  A Criterion for Ductile Fracture by the Growth of Holes , 1968 .

[10]  D. M. Tracey,et al.  On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields , 1969 .

[11]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  Evaluation of cylinder‐impact test data for constitutive model constants , 1988 .

[12]  Yi-long Bai,et al.  Adiabatic Shear Localization: Occurrence, Theories and Applications , 1992 .

[13]  A. Gurson.  Plastic flow and fracture behavior of ductile materials incorporating void nucleation, growth and interaction , 1988 .

[14]  Odd Sture Hopperstad,et al.  Perforation of 12 mm thick steel plates by 20 mm diameter projectiles with flat, hemispherical and conical noses: Part II: numerical simulations , 2002 .

[15]  T. Wierzbicki,et al.  Calibration and evaluation of seven fracture models , 2005 .

[16]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures , 1985 .

[17]  T. Børvik,et al.  A computational model of viscoplasticity and ductile damage for impact and penetration , 2001 .

[18]  R. Woodward,et al.  Failure mechanisms in impacting penetrators , 1992, Journal of Materials Science.

[19]  T. Wierzbicki,et al.  On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space , 2004 .