Feeding Behaviors of Laying Hens With or Without Beak Trimming

This study quantifies feeding behavior of W-36 White Leghorn laying hens (77 to 80 weeks old) as influenced by the management practice of beak trimming. The feeding behavior was characterized using a newly developed measurement system and computational algorithm. Non-trimmed (NT) and beak-trimmed (BT) hens showed similar daily feed intake and meal size. However, the BT hens tended to spend longer time feeding (3.3 vs. 2.0 h/d, P < 0.01), which coincided with their slower ingestion rate of 0.43 g/min-kg0.75 vs. 0.79 g/min-kg0.75 for the NT counterparts (P < 0.05). The BT hens had shorter time intervals between meals (101 s vs. 151 s, P < 0.01). Selective feeding, as demonstrated by larger feed particles apparent in the leftover feed, was noted for the BT hens. The leftover feed had a lower crude protein/adjusted crude protein content for the BT birds than that for the NT birds (16.7% vs. 18.7%, P < 0.05). In addition, the leftover feed of the BT birds had lower contents in phosphorus, magnesium, potassium, zinc, and manganese (P < 0.05), although no significant differences were detected in calcium, sodium, or metabolic energy content. Baseline feeding behavior data of this nature may help quantify and ensure the welfare of animals through exercising proper engineering design and/or management considerations.

[1]  J. F. Hurnik,et al.  Behavior, Production, and Weil-Being of the Laying Hen. 2. Individual Variation and Relationships of Behavior to Production and Physical Condition , 1991 .

[2]  D. Waddington,et al.  Behavioural evidence for persistent pain following partial beak amputation in chickens , 1990 .

[3]  D O Noble,et al.  Beak trimming of turkeys. 2. Effects of arc beak trimming on weight gain, feed intake, feed wastage, and feed conversion. , 1997, Poultry science.

[4]  I. Duncan,et al.  Measuring preferences and the strength of preferences. , 1992, Poultry science.

[5]  J. Craig,et al.  Beak trimming effects on behavior patterns, fearfulness, feathering, and mortality among three stocks of White Leghorn pullets in cages or floor pens. , 1991, Poultry science.

[6]  G. Milliken,et al.  Research note: effects of beak trimming and genetic stock on rate of mash consumption and feeding-related behavior in egg-strain pullets. , 1992, Poultry science.

[7]  D. L. Cunningham,et al.  Beak Trimming Effects on Performance, Behavior and Welfare of Chickens: A Review , 1992 .

[8]  J C Swanson,et al.  Farm animal well-being and intensive production systems. , 1995, Journal of animal science.

[9]  R B Christmas,et al.  Research note: the performance of spring- and summer-reared broilers as affected by precision beak trimming at seven days of age. , 1993, Poultry science.

[10]  Hongwei Xin,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Measurement Techniques of Feeding Behavior of Individual Poultry , 2001 .

[11]  F. Struwe,et al.  Stress measurements on beak-trimmed and untrimmed pullets. , 1992, Poultry science.