Biomimetic Urban Design: Ecosystem Service Provision of Water and Energy

This paper presents an ecosystem biomimicry methodology for urban design called ecosystem service analysis. Ecosystem services analysis can provide quantifiable goals for urban ecological regeneration that are determined by site specific ecology and climate of an urban area. This is important given the large negative environmental impact that most cities currently have on ecosystems. If cities can provide some of their own ecosystem services, pressure may be decreased on the surrounding ecosystems. This is crucial because healthier ecosystems enable humans to better adapt to the impacts that climate change is currently having on urban built environments and will continue to have in the future. A case study analyzing two ecosystem services (provision of energy and provision of water) for an existing urban environment (Wellington, New Zealand) is presented to demonstrate how the ecosystem services analysis concept can be applied to an existing urban context. The provision of energy in Wellington was found to be an example of an ecosystem service where humans could surpass the performance of pre-development ecosystem conditions. When analyzing the provision of water it was found that although total rainfall in the urban area is almost 200% higher than the water used in the city, if rainwater harvested from existing rooftops were to meet just the demands of domestic users, water use would need to be reduced by 20%. The paper concludes that although achieving ecological performance goals derived from ecosystem services analysis in urban areas is likely to be difficult, determining site and climate specific goals enable urban design professionals to know what a specific city should be aiming for if it is to move towards better sustainability outcomes.

[1]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[2]  Michael Roberts Building a life , 1990 .

[3]  Maibritt Pedersen Zari,et al.  Biomimetic design for climate change adaptation and mitigation , 2010 .

[4]  Carolyn M. Tennessen,et al.  Views to nature: Effects on attention , 1995 .

[5]  Maibritt Pedersen Zari,et al.  Ecosystem services analysis: Mimicking ecosystem services for regenerative urban design , 2015 .

[6]  Nalanie Mithraratne,et al.  Roof-top wind turbines for microgeneration in urban houses in New Zealand , 2009 .

[7]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  What are the Benefits of Interacting with Nature? , 2013, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[8]  Robert Vale,et al.  Utilising exotic flora in support of urban indigenous biodiversity: lessons for landscape architecture , 2018 .

[9]  R. Ulrich View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. , 1984, Science.

[10]  F. E. Kuo,et al.  VIEWS OF NATURE AND SELF-DISCIPLINE: EVIDENCE FROM INNER CITY CHILDREN , 2002 .

[11]  Kenneth Gillingham Economic efficiency of solar hot water policy in New Zealand , 2009 .

[12]  R. D. Groot,et al.  A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services , 2002 .

[13]  Tamim Younos,et al.  Paradigm shift: Holistic approach for water management in urban environments , 2011 .

[14]  Patrick ten Brink,et al.  The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity in National and International Policy Making , 2012 .

[15]  Brenda Vale,et al.  Life cycle analysis model for New Zealand houses , 2004 .

[16]  F. E. Kuo,et al.  Environment and Crime in the Inner City , 2001 .

[17]  M. McKinney,et al.  Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation , 2002 .

[18]  Maibritt Pedersen Zari,et al.  Ecosystem services analysis for the design of regenerative built environments , 2012 .

[19]  Bert Bras,et al.  Holism, Biomimicry and Sustainable Engineering , 2005 .

[20]  Maibritt Pedersen Zari,et al.  Ecosystem services analysis for the design of regenerative built environments , 2012 .

[21]  Christopher Coutts,et al.  Green Infrastructure, Ecosystem Services, and Human Health , 2015, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[22]  S. Díaz,et al.  Biodiversity Loss Threatens Human Well-Being , 2006, PLoS biology.

[23]  William E. Rees,et al.  The built environment and the ecosphere: a global perspective , 1999 .

[24]  Robert Costanza,et al.  49 Chapter 4 VALUING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES WITH EFFICIENCY , FAIRNESS , AND SUSTAINABILITY AS GOALS , 1999 .

[25]  R. Costanza,et al.  Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  F. H. Bormann,et al.  An Inseparable Linkage: Conservation of Natural Ecosystems and the Conservation of Fossil Energy. , 1976 .

[27]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Hydropower: Dimensions of social and environmental coexistence , 2008 .

[28]  Un Desa Transforming our world : The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2016 .

[29]  V. Bell,et al.  The impact of projected increases in urbanization on ecosystem services , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  David Jones,et al.  Water, Water everywhere , 1997, Nature.

[31]  Maibritt Pedersen Zari,et al.  Mimicking ecosystems for bio-inspired intelligent urban built environments , 2016 .

[32]  Nalanie Mithraratne,et al.  Rain tanks or reticulated water supply , 2007 .

[33]  Maibritt Pedersen Zari,et al.  Ecosystem processes for biomimetic architectural and urban design , 2015 .