Toward Agent-based Modeling of the U.S. Department of Defense Acquisition System

Abstract The systems development, procurement and sustainment of a nation's military equipment is vital to its national interests, but the process is complex, constantly changing and highly adaptive, as well as time consuming and costly. The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) expends both large amounts of capital and manpower to equip its armed forces. This research seeks to identify opportunities to gain better insight into the functioning of the defense acquisition system, building on previous simulations. A case is made that the DoD Requirements, Planning Acquisition, Technology and Logistics System is a complex adaptive system that has characteristics appropriate for exploration with agent-based modeling. This paper reviews relevant literature, existing models and presents preliminary analysis on an agent-based simulation of the DoD acquisition system. This research finds that agent-based modeling can provide insights to inform new acquisition theory.

[1]  Keith F. Snider.  An Analysis of the Relationship Between the Professionalism of Defense Acquisition Program Managers and Program Outcomes , 2011 .

[2]  Mark Cancian.  Acquisition Reform: It's Not as Easy as It Seems , 1995 .

[3]  Gabriel Marcella,et al.  Affairs of State: The Interagency and National Security , 2012 .

[4]  M. Tushman,et al.  Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts , 2012 .

[5]  Jason Brownlee,et al.  Complex adaptive systems , 2007 .

[6]  Kathleen M. Carley.  Computational organizational science and organizational engineering , 2002, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[7]  Richard E. Stockwell,et al.  The weapons acquisition process: An economic analysis , 1963 .

[8]  Col. George E. Reed.  Leadership and Systems Thinking , 2006 .

[9]  Gregg Marshall Burgess.  A management analysis and systems model of Department of Defense acquisition structure and policy , 1988 .

[10]  Budgetary Assessments,et al.  Promoting efficiency in the Department of Defense : keep trying, but be realistic , 2002 .

[11]  Hazhir Rahmandad,et al.  Heterogeneity and Network Structure in the Dynamics of Diffusion: Comparing Agent-Based and Differential Equation Models , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[12]  William B. Rouse,et al.  Transforming the Acquisition Enterprise: A Framework for Analysis and a Case Study of Ship Acquisition , 2007, Syst. Eng..

[13]  Murray Gell-Mann,et al.  Complexity and Complex Adaptive Systems , 1992 .

[14]  Robert Smith,et al.  Simulation-based Decision Support for Acquisition Policy and Process Design: The Effect of System and Enterprise Characteristics on Acquisition Outcomes , 2009 .

[15]  David S. Christensen,et al.  The Impact of the Packard Commission's Recommendations on Reducing Cost Overruns on Defense Acquisition Contracts , 1999 .

[16]  Merton J. Peck,et al.  The weapons acquisition process: An economic analysis , 1964 .

[17]  Clifford A. Grammich,et al.  Why Has The Cost of Navy Ships Risen , 2006 .

[18]  Michael J Sullivan,et al.  Defense Acquisitions: Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs , 2015 .

[19]  Charles M. Macal,et al.  To agent-based simulation from System Dynamics , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference.

[20]  Douglas L. Bland,et al.  New Weapons, Old Politics: America's Military Procurement Muddle , 1989 .

[21]  Mark W. Maier.  Architecting Principles for Systems‐of‐Systems , 1996 .

[22]  J. Ronald Fox,et al.  Defense Acquisition Reform, 19602009: An Elusive Goal , 2011 .

[23]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence , 2001 .

[24]  James F. Wilson.  Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It , 1990 .

[25]  Thomas J. Clark,et al.  A POLICY ANALYSIS OF DEFENSE WEAPONS ACQUISITION , 1985 .

[26]  Clifford A. Grammich,et al.  Why Has the Cost of Fixed-Wing Aircraft Risen? , 2008 .

[27]  Nina M. Serafino,et al.  Organizing the U.S. Government for National Security: Overview of the Interagency Reform Debates , 2008 .

[28]  J. Braithwaite,et al.  Health care as a complex adaptive system , 2013 .

[29]  A. Borshchev,et al.  From System Dynamics and Discrete Event to Practical Agent Based Modeling : Reasons , Techniques , Tools , 2004 .

[30]  Eric Bonabeau,et al.  Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Joseph R. Wirthlin,et al.  Identifying enterprise leverage points in Defense Acquisition Program performance , 2009 .

[32]  Michael J. North,et al.  Complex adaptive systems modeling with Repast Simphony , 2013, Complex Adapt. Syst. Model..

[33]  Charles M. Macal,et al.  Managing Business Complexity: Discovering Strategic Solutions with Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation , 2007 .

[34]  I. B. Holley,et al.  The Weapons Acquisition Process: Economic Incentives , 1965 .

[35]  D Cornelius.  The armed services? , 1966, The Pennsylvania nurse.

[36]  Patrick M. Cronin,et al.  Global Strategic Assessment 2009: America's Security Role in a Changing World , 2009 .

[37]  Keith F. Snider,et al.  Seven years of U.S. defense acquisition research: Analysis of proposals and projects , 2014 .

[38]  Moshe Schwartz,et al.  Defense Acquisitions: How DOD Acquires Weapon Systems and Recent Efforts to Reform the Process , 2013 .

[39]  Michael J. Pennock.  The economics of enterprise transformation: an analysis of the defense acquisition system , 2008 .

[40]  John T. Dillard.  Centralized Control of Defense Acquisition Programs: A Comparative Review of the Framework from 1987 - 2003 , 2003 .

[41]  John H. Holland,et al.  Studying Complex Adaptive Systems , 2006, J. Syst. Sci. Complex..

[42]  Thomas D. Clark,et al.  The defense acquisition system: A meta‐organizational analysis , 1990 .