An economic evaluation framework for membrane reactor modules in the presence of uncertainty: The case for process safety investment and risk reduction

A comprehensive Net Present Value (NPV) model has been developed to demonstrate the economic advantages of process safety and risk reduction investments on Pd/Au-based membrane reactors. In particular, the economic viability of Pd/Au-based membrane reactor modules incorporated into Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plants is evaluated within the aforementioned framework by pro-actively following sound process safety design principles. Sources of irreducible uncertainty (market, technological, operational) as well as safety risk are explicitly recognized, such as the Pd/Au prices, membrane life-time and loss in the power plant capacity factor due to possible accidents. The effect of the above uncertainty drivers on the membrane module cost along with production disruption and associated revenue losses is elucidated using Monte-Carlo simulation techniques that enable the propagation of the above uncertain inputs through the NPV-model, and therefore, generate a more realistic distribution of the process system's value rather than a single-point/estimate that overlooks these uncertainties. Pre-investment on risk reducing measures, such as spare safety relief systems (cautionary redundancy) for membrane reactor modules operating at high pressures (e.g. 50 atm), is shown to be economically more attractive than cases where analogous safety measures are not implemented. Since accidents and possibly catastrophic events do happen in an uncertain world, additional investment on safety measures could ensure a safer and more profitable operation of the process system under consideration giving credence to the thesis that process safety investments may result in enhanced techno-economic performance in the presence of irreducible uncertainties.

[1]  H J Pasman,et al.  Risk informed resource allocation policy: safety can save costs. , 2000, Journal of hazardous materials.

[2]  K. Aasberg-Petersen,et al.  Membrane reforming for hydrogen , 1998 .

[3]  Enrico Drioli,et al.  An economic feasibility study for water gas shift membrane reactor , 2001 .

[4]  Andrzej Stankiewicz,et al.  Re-Engineering the Chemical Processing Plant , 2003 .

[5]  H. Nakajima,et al.  Development of membrane reformer system for highly efficient hydrogen production from natural gas , 2009 .

[6]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with CO2 capture and storage. Part A: Review and selection of promising conversion and capture technologies , 2006 .

[7]  Yi Hua Ma,et al.  The effect of H2S on the performance of Pd and Pd/Au composite membrane , 2010 .

[8]  R. Donelson,et al.  Performance and economics of a Pd-based planar WGS membrane reactor for coal gasification , 2010 .

[9]  Mario Amelio,et al.  Integrated gasification gas combined cycle plant with membrane reactors: Technological and economical analysis , 2007 .

[10]  Y. Ma,et al.  Effect of H2S on the Performance and Long-Term Stability of Pd/Cu Membranes , 2009 .

[11]  Sam Savage,et al.  The Flaw of Averages , 2002 .

[12]  D. Jansen,et al.  Towards full-scale demonstration of hydrogen-selective membranes for CO2 capture: Inhibition effect of WGS-components on the H2 permeation through three Pd membranes of 44 cm long , 2010 .

[13]  Hans J. Pasman,et al.  Safety challenges in view of the upcoming hydrogen economy: An overview , 2010 .

[14]  A. M. Adris,et al.  Economics and simulation of fluidized bed membrane reforming , 1998 .

[15]  Yi Hua Ma,et al.  High pressure palladium membrane reactor for the high temperature water–gas shift reaction , 2011 .

[16]  Hui Li,et al.  Development of membrane reactor technology for power production with pre-combustion CO2 capture , 2011 .

[17]  Cyril F. Parry Relief Systems Handbook , 1992 .

[18]  Steven Pearce,et al.  Hydrogen from coal , 2006 .

[19]  M Bracht,et al.  Water gas shift membrane reactor for CO2 control in IGCC systems: techno-economic feasibility study , 1997 .

[20]  F. Mueller-Langer,et al.  Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production processes for the hydrogen economy for the short and medium term , 2007 .

[21]  Enrico Drioli,et al.  Analysis of safety aspects in a membrane reactor , 2006 .

[22]  Gaetano Iaquaniello,et al.  Membrane reforming in converting natural gas to hydrogen (part one) , 2008 .

[23]  John R. Grace,et al.  In-situ CO2 capture in a pilot-scale fluidized-bed membrane reformer for ultra-pure hydrogen production , 2011 .

[24]  J. N. Armor,et al.  Applications of catalytic inorganic membrane reactors to refinery products , 1998 .

[25]  Reyyan Koç Technical and Economic Performance Assessment of Pd/Alloy Membrane Reactor Technology Options in the Presence of Uncertainty , 2012 .

[26]  Howard J. Herzog,et al.  Capture-ready coal plants—Options, technologies and economics , 2007 .

[27]  Geoff W. Stevens,et al.  CO2 capture from pre-combustion processes—Strategies for membrane gas separation , 2010 .

[28]  Trevor A. Kletz Improving chemical engineering practices : a new look at old myths of the chemical industry , 1990 .

[29]  Yi Hua Ma,et al.  Defect‐free palladium membranes on porous stainless‐steel support , 1998 .

[30]  Klaus D. Timmerhaus,et al.  Plant design and economics for chemical engineers , 1958 .

[31]  Y. Ma,et al.  Dependence of hydrogen flux on the pore size and plating surface topology of asymmetric Pd-porous stainless steel membranes , 2002 .

[32]  Geof Brazier Combining Rupture Disks with Safety Relief Valves , 2009 .

[33]  Olav Bolland,et al.  High-temperature membranes in power generation with CO2 capture , 2004 .

[34]  Ing.Steffen Wieland,et al.  Membrane reactors for hydrogen production , 2002 .

[35]  Simon Benninga,et al.  Principles of finance with Excel , 2010 .

[36]  N. Kazantzis,et al.  Process safety aspects in water-gas-shift (WGS) membrane reactors used for pure hydrogen production , 2011 .

[37]  Gaetano Iaquaniello,et al.  Membrane reforming in converting natural gas to hydrogen: Production costs, Part II , 2008 .

[38]  Api Recommended Practice Guide for Pressure-Relieving and Depressuring Systems , 1997 .

[39]  N. Kazantzis,et al.  Hydrogen Production in a Large Scale Water–Gas Shift Pd-Based Catalytic Membrane Reactor , 2013 .

[40]  J. Pieterse,et al.  Performance test of a bench-scale multi-tubular membrane reformer , 2011 .

[41]  G. P. Reed,et al.  High temperature gas separation membranes in coal gasification , 2009 .

[42]  Wei Wei,et al.  Membrane performance requirements for carbon dioxide capture using hydrogen-selective membranes in i , 2011 .

[43]  Yi Hua Ma,et al.  Synthesis of composite Pd-porous stainless steel (PSS) membranes with a Pd/Ag intermetallic diffusion barrier , 2006 .