Perceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback-related negativity in the flanker gambling task.

A negative deflection in the event-related potential is enhanced following error- and loss-related feedback in decision-making and simple gambling tasks. Researchers have assumed that the perceptual properties of the feedback stimuli are unimportant in explaining these effects. This assumption was tested in the present study through a flanker gambling task, in which the perceptual properties of the feedback were manipulated. Consistent with previous studies, loss elicited a larger feedback-related negativity (FRN) than gain feedback. However, this FRN reward effect was modulated by the perceptual properties of the feedback stimuli. When gain and loss feedback were perceptually similar to each other, the enhancement of the FRN following the loss feedback was smaller compared to when the gain and loss feedback were different from each other. In addition, incongruent feedback elicited a larger FRN than congruent feedback; this FRN congruency effect was larger following gain than loss feedback. These results suggested that perceptual properties of the feedback stimuli play a role in the elicitation of the FRN.

[1]  Yanni Liu,et al.  Loss feedback negativity elicited by single- versus conjoined-feature stimuli , 2009, Neuroreport.

[2]  Joshua W. Brown,et al.  Medial prefrontal cortex as an action-outcome predictor , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  R. Baker,et al.  When is an error not a prediction error? An electrophysiological investigation , 2009, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[4]  Nicola K. Ferdinand,et al.  The Processing of Unexpected Positive Response Outcomes in the Mediofrontal Cortex , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Shiwei Jia,et al.  Detecting perceptual conflict by the feedback-related negativity in brain potentials , 2007, Neuroreport.

[6]  M. Posner,et al.  Localization of a Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1994 .

[7]  William J. Gehring,et al.  Separating cognitive processes with principal components analysis of EEG time-frequency distributions , 2008, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[8]  John J. B. Allen,et al.  Prelude to and Resolution of an Error: EEG Phase Synchrony Reveals Cognitive Control Dynamics during Action Monitoring , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  Context dependence of the event-related brain potential associated with reward and punishment. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[10]  Edward M Bernat,et al.  Externalizing psychopathology and gain-loss feedback in a simulated gambling task: dissociable components of brain response revealed by time-frequency analysis. , 2011, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[11]  William J. Williams,et al.  Decomposing ERP time–frequency energy using PCA , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  David Goodman,et al.  Performance Monitoring in the Anterior Cingulate is Not All Error Related: Expectancy Deviation and the Representation of Action-Outcome Associations , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  A computational account of altered error processing in older age: Dopamine and the error-related negativity , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[15]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  A. Sanfey,et al.  Independent Coding of Reward Magnitude and Valence in the Human Brain , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  It's worse than you thought: the feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[18]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Sensitivity of electrophysiological activity from medial frontal cortex to utilitarian and performance feedback. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  P. Read Montague,et al.  When Things Are Better or Worse than Expected: The Medial Frontal Cortex and the Allocation of Processing Resources , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Jonathan R. Folstein,et al.  Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[21]  Adrian R. Willoughby,et al.  Are all medial frontal negativities created equal ? Toward a richer empirical basis for theories of action monitoring , 2003 .

[22]  C. Braun,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Following Incorrect Feedback in a Time-Estimation Task: Evidence for a Generic Neural System for Error Detection , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[25]  William H. Alexander,et al.  Computational Models of Performance Monitoring and Cognitive Control , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[26]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  The good, the bad and the neutral: Electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli , 2006, Brain Research.

[27]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[28]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Errors in reward prediction are re£ected in the event-related brain potential , 2003 .

[29]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[30]  F. Vidal,et al.  Is the ‘error negativity’ specific to errors? , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[31]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[32]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[33]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex integrates reinforcement history to guide voluntary behavior , 2008, Cortex.

[34]  C. Kennard,et al.  Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[35]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  William J. Gehring,et al.  The Error-Related Negativity (ERN/Ne) , 2011 .

[37]  Statistics Corner Questions and answers about language testing statistics: Effect size and eta squared , 2000 .

[38]  Edward M. Bernat,et al.  Alcohol impairs brain reactivity to explicit loss feedback , 2011, Psychopharmacology.

[39]  Adrian R. Willoughby,et al.  The Medial Frontal Cortex and the Rapid Processing of Monetary Gains and Losses , 2002, Science.

[40]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Implementation of error-processing in the human anterior cingulate cortex: a source analysis of the magnetic equivalent of the error-related negativity , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[41]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control , 2004, Science.