The role of the casimir effect in the static deflection and stiction of membrane strips in microelectromechanical systems (MEMS)

We present an analysis describing how the Casimir effect can deflect a thin microfabricated rectangular membrane strip and possibly collapse it into a flat, parallel, fixed surface nearby. In the presence of the attractive parallel-plate Casimir force between the fixed surface and the membrane strip, the otherwise flat strip deflects into a curved shape, for which the derivation of an exact expression of the Casimir force is nontrivial and has not been carried out to date. We propose and adopt a local value approach for ascertaining the strength of the Casimir force between a flat surface and a slightly curved rectangular surface, such as the strip considered here. Justifications for this approach are discussed with reference to publications by other authors. The strength of the Casimir force, strongly dependent on the separation between the surfaces, increases with the deflection of the membrane, and can bring about the collapse of the strip into the fixed surface (stiction). Widely used in microelectromechanical systems both for its relative ease of fabrication and usefulness, the strip is a structure often plagued by stiction during or after the microfabrication process—especially surfacemicromachining. Our analysis makes no assumptions about the final or the intermediate shapes of the deflecting strip. Thus, in contrast to the usual methods of treating this type of problem, it disposes of the need for an ansatz or a series expansion of the solution to the differential equations. All but the very last step in the derivation of the main result are analytical, revealing some of the underlying physics. A dimensionless constant, K c , is extracted which relates the deflection at the center of the strip to physical and geometrical parameters of the system. These parameters can be controlled in microfabrication. They are the separation w 0 between the fixed surface and the strip in the absence of deflection, the thickness h, length L, and Young’s modulus of elasticity (of the strip), and a measure of the dielectricpermittivities of the strip, the fixed surface, and the filler fluid between them. It is shown that for some systems (K c >0.245), with the Casimir force being the only operative external force on the strip, a collapsed strip is inevitable. Numerical estimates can be made to determine if a given strip will collapse into a nearby surface due to the Casimir force alone, thus revealing the absolute minimum requirements on the geometrical dimensions for a stable (stiction-free) system. For those systems which do exhibit a stiction-free stable equilibrium state, the deflection at the middle of the strip is always found to be smaller than 0.48w 0 . This analysis is expected to be most accurately descriptive for strips with large aspect ratio (L/h) and small modulus of elasticity which also happen to be those most susceptible to stiction. Guidelines and examples are given to help estimate which structures meet these criteria for some technologically important materials, including metal and polymer thin films.

[1]  H. Tilmans,et al.  Stiction of surface micromachined structures after rinsing and drying: model and investigation of adhesion mechanisms , 1994 .

[2]  S. J. Enk.  Casimir torque between dielectrics. , 1995 .

[3]  B. Derjaguin,et al.  Direct measurement of molecular forces , 1978, Nature.

[4]  D. Deutsch,et al.  Boundary effects in quantum field theory , 1979 .

[5]  C. Hsu,et al.  Mechanical stability and adhesion of microstructures under capillary forces. I. Basic theory , 1993 .

[6]  Hüsnü Ata Erbay.  On the asymptotic membrane theory of thin hyperelastic plates , 1997 .

[7]  J. Schwinger,et al.  Casimir self-stress on a perfectly conducting spherical shell , 1978 .

[8]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  THEORY OF PLATES AND SHELLS , 1959 .

[9]  Cole,et al.  Extracting energy and heat from the vacuum. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[10]  Werner Karl Schomburg,et al.  An electrostatically actuated polymer microvalve equipped with a movable membrane electrode , 1997 .

[11]  K. J. Gabriel,et al.  Design, fabrication, and operation of submicron gap comb-drive microactuators , 1992 .

[12]  V. Mostepanenko,et al.  Corrections to vacuum forces resulting from small distortions of the geometry of a region , 1989 .

[13]  E. Lifshitz.  The theory of molecular attractive forces between solids , 1956 .

[14]  K. Dechoum,et al.  Casimir interaction between a microscopic dipole oscillator and a macroscopic solenoid , 1998 .

[15]  R. Legtenberg,et al.  Stiction in surface micromachining , 1996 .

[16]  D. Tabor,et al.  Surface Forces: Direct Measurement of Normal and Retarded van der Waals Forces , 1968, Nature.

[17]  P. Veltink,et al.  The mechanical properties of the rubber elastic polymer polydimethylsiloxane for sensor applications , 1997 .

[18]  M. L. Reed,et al.  Control of liquid bridging induced stiction of micromechanical structures , 1996 .

[19]  J. A. Voorthuyzen,et al.  Investigation of attractive forces between PECVD silicon nitride microstructures and an oxidized silicon substrate , 1992 .

[20]  G. J. Maclay,et al.  Vacuum stress between conducting plates: An Image solution , 1969 .

[21]  H. Tilmans,et al.  Electrostatically driven vacuum-encapsulated polysilicon resonators part II. theory and performance , 1994 .

[22]  Robert L. Forward,et al.  Extracting electrical energy from the vacuum by cohesion of charged foliated conductors , 1984 .

[23]  Wei Chen,et al.  Fabrication of high aspect ratio silicon pillars of <10 nm diameter , 1993 .

[24]  N. F. de Rooij,et al.  Investigations on free-standing polysilicon beams in view of their application as transducers , 1990 .

[25]  Cho,et al.  Measurement of the Casimir-Polder force. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[26]  Wouter Olthuis,et al.  A silicon condenser microphone with polyimide diaphragm and backplate , 1997 .

[27]  E. H. Mansfield.  The Bending and Stretching of Plates , 1963 .

[28]  AN ASYMPTOTIC THEORY OF THIN HYPERELASTIC PLATES. II, INCOMPRESSIBLE SOLIDS AND AN APPLICATION OF THE GENERAL THEORY , 1991 .

[29]  E. Elizalde,et al.  Essentials of the Casimir effect and its computation , 1991 .

[30]  Timothy H. Boyer,et al.  QUANTUM ELECTROMAGNETIC ZERO-POINT ENERGY OF A CONDUCTING SPHERICAL SHELL AND THE CASIMIR MODEL FOR A CHARGED PARTICLE. , 1968 .

[31]  B. Müller,et al.  The Casimir effect , 1986 .

[32]  The Casimir Effect as a Possible Source of Cosmic Energy , 1994 .

[33]  Spatial squeezing of the vacuum and the Casimir effect , 1996 .

[34]  G. J. Maclay,et al.  The anharmonic Casimir oscillator (ACO)-the Casimir effect in a model microelectromechanical system , 1995 .

[35]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  A particle theory of the Casimir effect , 1995, quant-ph/9510010.

[36]  W. Messner,et al.  Effects of elevated temperature treatments in microstructure release procedures , 1995 .

[37]  Miroslav Husak,et al.  One-chip integrated resonance circuit with a capacitive pressure sensor , 1997 .