Both perceptual and conceptual factors influence taste-odor and taste-taste interactions

Observers are often asked to make intensity judgments for a sensory attribute of a stimulus that is embedded in a background of “irrelevant” stimulusdimensions. Under some circumstances, these background dimensions of the stimulus can influence intensity judgments for the target attribute. For example, judgments of sweetness can be influenced by the other taste or-odor qualities of a solution (Frank & Byram, 1988; Kamen et al., 1961). Experiments 1 and 2 assessed the influence of stimulus context, instructional set, and reference stimuli on cross-quality interactions in mixtures of chemosensory stimuli. Experiment 1 demonstrated that odor-induced changes in sweetness judgments were dramatically influenced when subjects rated multiple attributes of the stimulus as compared with when they judged sweetness alone. Several odorants enhanced sweetness when sweetness alone was judged, while sweetness was suppressed for these same stimuli when total-intensity ratings were broken down into ratings for the sweetness, saltiness, sourness, bitterness, and fruitiness of each solution. Experiment 2 demonstrated a similar pattern of results when bitterness was the target taste. In addition, Experiment 2 showed that the instructional effects applied to both taste-odorand taste-taste mixtures. It was concluded that the taste enhancement and suppression observed for taste-odor and taste-taste mixtures are influenced by (1) instructional sets which influence subjects’ concepts of attribute categories, and (2) the perceptual similarities among the quality dimensions of the stimulus.

[1]  H. Lawless The pleasantness of mixtures in taste and olfaction. , 1977, Sensory processes.

[2]  R. Gregson,et al.  Sourness and bitterness: confusions over sequences of taste judgements. , 1973, British journal of psychology.

[3]  H. Lawless,et al.  Context-dependent changes in the perception of odor quality , 1991 .

[4]  H. Lawless Evidence for neural inhibition in bittersweet taste mixtures. , 1979, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[5]  D. Mcburney,et al.  Gustatory cross-adaptation: does a single mechanism code the salty taste? , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  A. Parducci Category judgment: a range-frequency model. , 1965, Psychological review.

[7]  D. Gillan Taste-taste, odor-odor, and taste-odor mixtures: Greater suppression within than between modalities , 1983, Perception & Psychophysics.

[8]  W S Cain,et al.  Mutual action of taste and olfaction. , 1977, Sensory processes.

[9]  Paradoxical adaptation to taste mixtures , 1982, Physiology & Behavior.

[10]  R. Frank,et al.  Intensity and hedonic judgments of taste mixtures: an information integration analysis , 1986 .

[11]  J. Kuznicki,et al.  Taste quality differences within the sweet and salty taste categories. , 1979, Sensory processes.

[12]  Linda M. Bartoshuk,et al.  Taste mixtures: Is mixture suppression related to compression? , 1975, Physiology & Behavior.

[13]  D. Hornung,et al.  The independence and integration of olfaction and taste , 1984 .

[14]  D. Hornung,et al.  Contributions of Smell and taste to overall intensity , 1985 .

[15]  J. Kamen,et al.  Interactions of suprathreshold taste stimuli. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  Robert A. Frank,et al.  Taste–smell interactions are tastant and odorant dependent , 1988 .

[17]  H. Schifferstein,et al.  Sensory integration in citric acid/sucrose mixtures , 1990 .

[18]  William S. Cain,et al.  Taste and olfaction: Independence vs interaction , 1980, Physiology & Behavior.

[19]  Robert A. Frank,et al.  Strawberry odor, but not red color, enhances the sweetness of sucrose solutions , 1989 .

[20]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  Confusion in the use of the taste adjectives ‘sour’ and ‘bitter’ , 1979 .