Partitioning of monosynaptic Ia excitatory post‐synaptic potentials in the motor nucleus of the cat semimembranosus muscle.

In anaesthetized low‐spinal cats, intracellular recordings were made of the Ia excitatory post‐synaptic potential (e.p.s.p.) responses of semimembranosus motoneurones to electrical stimulation (Group I range) of nerve branches supplying the anterior and posterior heads of semimembranosus, the anterior and posterior parts of biceps femoris, and the distal part of semitendinosus. Recordings were also made during stimulation of nerves to the gracilis muscle and to the vasti muscle group. Stimulation of the semimembranosus‐anterior nerve branch produced Ia e.p.s.p.s. of greater amplitude in semimembranosus‐anterior motoneurones than in semimembranosus‐posterior cells; likewise, stimulation of the semimembranosus‐posterior nerve branch produced larger e.p.s.p.s. in cells which supplied the posterior head than in those which supplied the anterior head. Stimulation of the nerve branches to components of two 'flexor' muscles (Sherrington, 1910), biceps‐posterior and semitendinosus‐distal, produced larger e.p.s.p.s in semimembranosus‐posterior cells than in the anterior motoneurones. A tendency was found for stimulation of the nerve to biceps femoris‐anterior (an 'extensor') to produce larger e.p.s.p.s in semimembranosus‐anterior than in‐posterior motoneurones. However, this effect was of borderline (0.06 greater than P greater than 0.05) significance. The limited monosynaptic input produced by stimulation of the nerves to the gracilis and vasti muscles showed that their Ia axons do not distinguish between the two semimembranosus cell groups. A slight topographic organization of motoneurones within the semimembranosus motor nucleus was found, with anterior cells encountered, on average, at a more rostral level of the spinal cord than posterior cells. A similar topographic arrangement was observed in the rostrocaudal distribution of Group I afferent fibres in the dorsal roots and motor axons from the two sets of motoneurones in the ventral roots. These findings are consistent with 'location specificity' (Scott & Mendell, 1976) being a factor which contributes to the observed pattern of homonymous Ia connexions. A role for 'species specificity' (Scott & Mendell, 1976) in determining the observed pattern of homonymous Ia connexions was indicated by species‐dependent differences in e.p.s.p. amplitude in pairs of semimembranosus‐anterior and ‐posterior motoneurones at similar rostrocaudal locations in the spinal cord. The pattern of heteronymous connexions to the semimembranosus motor nucleus also showed evidence for species specificity. However, no clear topographic pattern was evident in these connexions.

[1]  S. Peters,et al.  The actions of three hamstring muscles of the cat: A mechanical analysis , 1977, Journal of morphology.

[2]  J. Fleshman,et al.  Recurrent inhibition in type-identified motoneurons. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  R M Reinking,et al.  A commentary on muscle unit properties in cat hindlimb muscles , 1980, Journal of morphology.

[4]  R. Stein,et al.  Stable long-term recordings from cat peripheral nerves , 1977, Brain Research.

[5]  F. Zajac Thigh muscle activity during maximum-height jumps by cats. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  V. Edgerton,et al.  HINDLIMB MUSCLE FIBER POPULATIONS OF FIVE MAMMALS , 1973 .

[7]  L. Cohen Localization of stretch reflex. , 1953, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  A bipolar electrode for peripheral nerve stimulation , 1979, Brain Research Bulletin.

[9]  R. Burke Motor Units: Anatomy, Physiology, and Functional Organization , 1981 .

[10]  J. Munson,et al.  Membrane electrical properties and prediction of motor-unit type of medial gastrocnemius motoneurons in the cat. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  E K Stauffer,et al.  Analysis of muscle receptor connections by spike-triggered averaging. 1. Spindle primary and tendon organ afferents. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  G. Romanes,et al.  The motor cell columns of the lumbo‐sacral spinal cord of the cat , 1951, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  M D Binder,et al.  Topographic factors in distribution of homonymous group Ia-afferent input to cat medial gastrocnemius motoneurons. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  D Burke,et al.  Absence of somatotopic projection of muscle afferents onto motoneurons of same muscle. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  V R Edgerton,et al.  Architectural, histochemical, and contractile characteristics of a unique biarticular muscle: the cat semitendinosus. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  J. Fleshman,et al.  Synaptic and mechanical coupling between type-identified motor units and individual spindle afferents of medial gastrocnemius muscle of the cat. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  I. Engberg,et al.  An electromyographic analysis of muscular activity in the hindlimb of the cat during unrestrained locomotion. , 1969, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[18]  B R Botterman,et al.  Localization of monosynaptic Ia excitatory post‐synaptic potentials in the motor nucleus of the cat biceps femoris muscle. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  M D Binder,et al.  Analysis of individual Ia-afferent EPSPs in a homonymous motoneuron pool with respect to muscle topography. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  D. Levine,et al.  Physiological types and histochemical profiles in motor units of the cat gastrocnemius , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  W. Crill,et al.  Specific membrane properties of cat motoneurones , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  L. Mendell,et al.  Individual EPSPs produced by single triceps surae Ia afferent fibers in homonymous and heteronymous motoneurons. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  J. Eccles,et al.  The convergence of monosynaptic excitatory afferents on to many different species of alpha motoneurones , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  J. Fleshman,et al.  Rheobase, input resistance, and motor-unit type in medial gastrocnemius motoneurons in the cat. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  V. J. Wilson,et al.  Pattern of segmental monosynaptic input to cat dorsal neck motoneurons. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Roland R. Roy,et al.  Recruitment of the proximal and distal portions of the cat semitendinosus during running and jumping , 1981 .

[27]  S. G. Nelson,et al.  Projection of single knee flexor Ia fibers to homonymous and heteronymous motoneurons. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  C. Sherrington Flexion‐reflex of the limb, crossed extension‐reflex, and reflex stepping and standing , 1910, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  A. Lundberg,et al.  Integrative pattern of Ia synaptic actions on motoneurones of hip and knee muscles , 1958, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  E Henneman,et al.  Topographic distribution of terminals of Ia and group II fibers in spinal cord, as revealed by postsynaptic population potentials. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  B R Botterman,et al.  Distribution of monosynaptic Ia excitatory post‐synaptic potentials in the motor nucleus of the cat semitendinosus muscle. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  S. V. Noven DESIGN FEATURES OF THE SEGMENTAL MOTOR CONTROL SYSTEM: THE EFFICACY OF MONOSYNAPTIC SPINDLE IA CONNECTIONS ONTO THEIR HOMONYMOUS MOTONEURONS (EPSP, SPINAL CORD, COMPOSITE, NEUROPHYSIOLOGY). , 1984 .

[33]  L. Cohen Organization of stretch reflex into two types of direct spinal arcs. , 1954, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Y. Uchino,et al.  Localization of proprioceptive reflexes in the splenius muscle of the cat , 1982, Brain Research.