Leadership Style, Anonymity, and Creativity in Group Decision Support Systems: The Mediating Role of Optimal Flow

ABSTRACT Prior research indicates that flow, a psychological state characterized by concentration, enjoyment, and intrinsic motivation, may be linked to creativity of individuals participating in computer-mediated meetings. A laboratory experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of leadership style (transactional contingent reward and transformational) and anonymity level (identified and anonymous) on flow and creativity of 159 undergraduate students working in groups performing a creativity task using a Group Decision Support System (GDSS). Results demonstrated that flow mediated effects of leadership on creativity in a GDSS context, and its role may be moderated by anonymity. Results also indicated that both flow and anonymity were required for enhancing creativity in a GDSS context. Implications for practice and research are discussed.

[1]  S. Scott,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE , 1994 .

[2]  Eunice M. L. Soriano de Alencar,et al.  Characteristics of on Organizational Environment which Stimulate and Inhibit Creativity , 1997 .

[3]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Validity and Reliability of the Experience‐Sampling Method , 1987, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[4]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[5]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[6]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[7]  S. Deshpande,et al.  Task Characteristics and the Experience of Optimal Flow in Human—Computer Interaction , 1994 .

[8]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  G. Stein,et al.  Examining flow experiences in sport contexts: Conceptual issues and methodological concerns , 1992 .

[10]  K. S. Raman,et al.  The Effect of GDSS and Elected Leadership on Small Group Meetings , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience in work and leisure. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work , 1996 .

[13]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity , 1993 .

[14]  J. P. Guilford,et al.  Varieties of Divergent Production. , 1984 .

[15]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  A conceptual framework of anonymity in Group Support Systems , 1992 .

[16]  B. Bass,et al.  Superiors' evaluations and subordinates' perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership. , 1988 .

[17]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Adding to Contingent-Reward Behavior , 1990 .

[18]  Leonard M. Jessup,et al.  The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task , 1990, MIS Q..

[19]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  The Effects of Group Attitudes Toward Alternative GDSS Designs on the Decision‐making Performance of Computer‐Supported Groups* , 1994 .

[20]  M. Arthur,et al.  The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-Concept Based Theory , 1993 .

[21]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[22]  J. Walther.  Relational Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time , 1995 .

[23]  Carol Sansone,et al.  Rewarding pinball wizardry: Effects of evaluation and cue value on intrinsic interest , 1984 .

[24]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings , 1988, MIS Q..

[25]  Milam Aiken,et al.  Using a Group Decision Support System For Creativity , 1993 .

[26]  William McKinley,et al.  Organizational Decline and Adaptation: Theoretical Controversies , 1993 .

[27]  Creativity Styles of Supervising Managers , 1997 .

[28]  Milton E. Rosenbaum,et al.  Comment on a proposed two-stage theory of relationship formation: first, repulsion. Then, attraction , 1986 .

[29]  John J. Sosik,et al.  Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. , 1997 .

[30]  John M. Jermier,et al.  Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement , 1978 .