Ten steps applied to development and evaluation of process-based biogeochemical models of estuaries

The procedures involved in model development may be set out as a ten step process, beginning with defining the purpose of the model and ending with evaluation of the appropriateness and utility of the completed model. This process, recently outlined by Jakeman et al. [Jakeman, A.J., Letcher, R.A., Norton, J.P., 2006. Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental models. Environmental Modelling and Software 21, 602-614], is often iterative as model development is a continuous process that refines and improves the intended capacity of the model. Here, the ten steps of model development are critiqued and applied using a process-based biogeochemical model of aquatic systems, with examples from two case studies: a model of phytoplankton succession and nutrient concentrations in the Swan-Canning Estuary (Western Australia) and a model of sediment and nutrient transport and transformation in the Fitzroy Estuary and Keppel Bay (Queensland).

[1]  David P. Hamilton,et al.  Effect of freshwater flow on the succession and biomass of phytoplankton in a seasonal estuary , 2001 .

[2]  M. B. Beck,et al.  Uncertainty and forecasting of water quality , 1983 .

[3]  A. Mccomb,et al.  Production by microphytobenthos in the Swan–Canning Estuary , 2001 .

[4]  John Parslow,et al.  Modelling of nutrient impacts in Port Phillip Bay : a semi-enclosed marine Australian ecosystem , 1999 .

[5]  Nicolas Treich,et al.  Decision-Making Under Scientific Uncertainty: The Economics of the Precautionary Principle , 2003 .

[6]  A. Mulligan,et al.  Genetic Algorithms for Calibrating Water Quality Models , 1998 .

[7]  David P. Hamilton,et al.  Integrating research and management for an urban estuarine system: the Swan–Canning Estuary, Western Australia , 2001 .

[8]  George M. Hornberger,et al.  An Approach to the Analysis of Behavior and Sensitivity in Environmental Systems , 1983 .

[9]  David P. Hamilton,et al.  A numerical simulation of the role of zooplankton in C, N and P cycling in Lake Kinneret, Israel , 2006 .

[10]  E. Fulton,et al.  Effect of complexity on marine ecosystem models , 2003 .

[11]  David P. Hamilton,et al.  Summer flow event induces a cyanobacterial bloom in a seasonal Western Australian estuary , 2003 .

[12]  Terence Chan Phytoplankton dynamics in a seasonal estuary , 2006 .

[13]  A. J. Southward,et al.  Plankton and Productivity in the Oceans , 1964 .

[14]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Going Public and the Sale of Shares with Heterogeneous Investors: Agent‐Based Computational Modelling and Computer Simulations , 2001 .

[15]  J. Imberger,et al.  Modeling basin‐scale internal waves in a stratified lake , 2000 .

[16]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental models , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[17]  Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs,et al.  Ecosystem model complexity versus physical forcing: Quantification of their relative impact with assimilated Arabian Sea data , 2006 .

[18]  David P. Hamilton,et al.  Modelling phytoplankton succession and biomass in a seasonal west Australian estuary , 2002 .

[19]  Roger A. Falconer,et al.  Flow and solute fluxes in integrated wetland and coastal systems , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[20]  H. Künsch,et al.  Practical identifiability analysis of large environmental simulation models , 2001 .

[21]  David P. Hamilton,et al.  Impacts of hydrological changes on phytoplankton succession in the Swan River, Western Australia , 2002 .

[22]  Barbara A. Adams-Vanharn,et al.  Evaluation of the current state of mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical modeling: citation analysis and future perspectives. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  C. Perrin,et al.  Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments , 2001 .

[24]  Heikki Haario,et al.  Bayesian modelling of algal mass occurrences - using adaptive MCMC methods with a lake water quality model , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[25]  N. Gribble,et al.  A spatially explicit multi-competitor coexistence model of penaeid (shrimp) distribution on the Australian Great Barrier Reef , 2004 .

[26]  John Parslow,et al.  The analysis of alternative formulations in a simple model of a coastal ecosystem , 1999 .

[27]  David P. Hamilton,et al.  Three-dimensional modelling of a Microcystis bloom event in the Swan River estuary, Western Australia , 2004 .

[28]  M. E. Bairda,et al.  The use of mechanistic descriptions of algal growth and zooplankton grazing in an estuarine eutrophication model , 2003 .

[29]  David P. Hamilton,et al.  Comparison of a mechanistic sediment model and a water column model for hindcasting oxygen decay in benthic chambers , 2001 .

[30]  Anne Ng,et al.  Selection of genetic algorithm operators for river water quality model calibration , 2003 .

[31]  David M. Nelson,et al.  Plankton and Productivity in the Oceans. Volume 1: Phytoplankton , 1982 .

[32]  Alexander G. Murray,et al.  The use of simple models in the design and calibration of a dynamic 2D model of a semi-enclosed Australian bay , 2001 .

[33]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  Assessing the decline of brown trout (Salmo trutta) in Swiss rivers using a Bayesian probability network , 2006 .

[34]  J. Imberger,et al.  Simple Curvilinear Method for Numerical Methods of Open Channels , 2001 .

[35]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resource variables: a review of modelling issues and applications , 2000, Environ. Model. Softw..