Aortic valve area on 64-MDCT correlates with transesophageal echocardiography in aortic stenosis.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of our study was to compare aortic valve area and calcification between CT and echocardiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed retrospective evaluation of 80 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis (AS) who underwent ECG-gated 64-MDCT and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Valve planimetry was feasible in 80 patients with CT and in 63 patients with TEE; valve area by transthoracic echocardiography was available in 46 patients. Valve calcification grade on CT was compared with TEE. One cardiologist (echocardiography) and two radiologists (CT) independently and blindly reviewed the studies. Pearson's correlations, Spearman's rank correlations, paired Student's t tests, and weighted kappa tests were used. RESULTS The median valve area on TEE was 0.7 +/- 0.9 cm(2). There was excellent correlation (n = 80; r = 0.91, p < 0.001) and no difference (0.06 +/- 0.26 cm(2), p = 0.06) between CT readers. There was strong correlation (n = 63; r = 0.84, p < 0.001) and no difference (-0.06 +/- 0.48 cm(2), p = 0.33) in valve area between CT and TEE, with a strong correlation (n = 46; r = 0.83, p < 0.001) and small overestimation (0.17 +/- 0.33 cm(2), p < 0.001) in valve area with CT versus transthoracic echocardiography. The sensitivity and specificity of CT to detect severe aortic stenosis compared with TEE were 92.1% (35/38) and 89.5% (17/19), respectively. Calcification grade had fair agreement between CT readers and TEE (kappa = 0.34 and 0.37, respectively). CONCLUSION Aortic valve area on CT strongly correlates with echocardiography and has excellent sensitivity and specificity to detect severe stenosis. Valve calcification has fair agreement between studies. Valve area and calcification should be reported on CT angiography in patients with AS.

[1]  Vartan Kurtcuoglu,et al.  Remodelling of the aortic root in severe tricuspid aortic stenosis: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation , 2009, European Radiology.

[2]  F. Flachskampf,et al.  Planimetry of Orifice Area in Aortic Stenosis Using Multiplane Transesophageal Echocardiography , 1994 .

[3]  A. Cohen-Solal,et al.  Diagnosis of aortic valvular stenosis by multislice cardiac computed tomography. , 2006, European heart journal.

[4]  T. Villines,et al.  International, multidisciplinary update of the 2006 Appropriateness Criteria for cardiac computed tomography. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[5]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Aortic valve calcification as quantified with multislice computed tomography predicts short-term clinical outcome in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. , 2006, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[7]  M. Schemper,et al.  Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  R. Günther,et al.  Prevalence and clinical importance of aortic valve calcification detected incidentally on CT scans: comparison with echocardiography. , 2006, Radiology.

[9]  C. Tribouilloy,et al.  Quantitation of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis with multiplane transesophageal echocardiography: comparison with monoplane transesophageal approach. , 1994, American heart journal.

[10]  J. Wildberger,et al.  Aortic valve calcification as a marker for aortic stenosis severity: assessment on 16-MDCT. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  J. Kupersmith,et al.  Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic determination of aortic valve area in adults with aortic stenosis. , 1991, American heart journal.

[12]  E. Kazerooni,et al.  Hemodynamic and functional assessment of mechanical aortic valves using combined echocardiography and multidetector computed tomography. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[13]  Dieter zur Nedden,et al.  Multislice computed tomography for detection of patients with aortic valve stenosis and quantification of severity. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  F. Lin,et al.  Comparison of cardiac computed tomographic angiography to transesophageal echocardiography for evaluation of patients with native valvular heart disease. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  V. Roger,et al.  Comparison of 64-slice computed tomography planimetry and Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of aortic valve stenosis. , 2007, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[16]  E. Mohler,et al.  Electron beam computed tomography for the quantification of aortic valvular calcification. , 2001, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[17]  S. Wildermuth,et al.  Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiography. , 2006, Radiology.

[18]  Anne-Catherine Pouleur,et al.  Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. , 2007, Radiology.

[19]  C. Roobottom,et al.  Three dimensional volume quantification of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography , 2003, Heart.

[20]  J. Serfaty,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation of preoperative patients with aortic valve stenosis: usefulness of cardiac multidetector computed tomography , 2007, Heart.

[21]  W. Nitz,et al.  Planimetry of Aortic Valve Area in Aortic Stenosis by Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[22]  J. Barkhausen,et al.  Assessment of Aortic Valve Area in Aortic Stenosis Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Tomography: Comparison with Echocardiography , 2007, Cardiology.

[23]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Thoracic aorta: motion artifact reduction with retrospective and prospective electrocardiography-assisted multi-detector row CT. , 2002, Radiology.

[24]  A. Makaryus,et al.  Added value of CT in adult congenital heart disease , 2009 .

[25]  R. Kronmal,et al.  Reproducibility of CT measurements of aortic valve calcification, mitral annulus calcification, and aortic wall calcification in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[26]  U. Sechtem,et al.  Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques , 2004, Heart.

[27]  J. Sanz,et al.  Evaluation of cardiac valves using multidetector CT. , 2009, Cardiology clinics.

[28]  C. Hamm,et al.  Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standards? , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  C. White,et al.  CT angiography of the cardiac valves: normal, diseased, and postoperative appearances. , 2009, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.