Shear‐dependent ‘stick‐and‐roll’ adhesion of type 1 fimbriated Escherichia coli

It is generally assumed that bacteria are washed off surfaces as fluid flow increases because they adhere through ‘slip‐bonds’ that weaken under mechanical force. However, we show here that the opposite is true for Escherichia coli attachment to monomannose‐coated surfaces via the type 1 fimbrial adhesive subunit, FimH. Raising the shear stress (within the physiologically relevant range) increased accumulation of type 1 fimbriated bacteria on monomannose surfaces by up to two orders of magnitude, and reducing the shear stress caused them to detach. In contrast, bacterial binding to anti‐FimH antibody‐coated surfaces showed essentially the opposite behaviour, detaching when the shear stress was increased. These results can be explained if FimH is force‐activated; that is, that FimH mediates ‘catch‐bonds’ with mannose that are strengthened by tensile mechanical force. As a result, on monomannose‐coated surfaces, bacteria displayed a complex ‘stick‐and‐roll’ adhesion in which they tended to roll over the surface at low shear but increasingly halted to stick firmly as the shear was increased. Mutations in FimH that were predicted earlier to increase or decrease force‐induced conformational changes in FimH were furthermore shown here to increase or decrease the probability that bacteria exhibited the stationary versus the rolling mode of adhesion. This ‘stick‐and‐roll’ adhesion could allow type 1 fimbriated bacteria to move along mannosylated surfaces under relatively low flow conditions and to accumulate preferentially in high shear regions.

[1]  E. Butcher,et al.  Chemokines and the arrest of lymphocytes rolling under flow conditions. , 1998, Science.

[2]  I. Wang,et al.  Adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis to biomedical polymers: contributions of surface thermodynamics and hemodynamic shear conditions. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  K. Konstantopoulos,et al.  Receptor–ligand binding: ‘catch’ bonds finally caught , 2003, Current Biology.

[4]  J M Anderson,et al.  Shear stress effects on bacterial adhesion, leukocyte adhesion, and leukocyte oxidative capacity on a polyetherurethane. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[5]  Timothy A. Springer,et al.  The Kinetics of L-selectin Tethers and the Mechanics of Selectin-mediated Rolling , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  Viola Vogel,et al.  Bacterial Adhesion to Target Cells Enhanced by Shear Force , 2002, Cell.

[7]  Timothy A. Springer,et al.  Adhesion through L-selectin requires a threshold hydrodynamic shear , 1996, Nature.

[8]  D. Dykhuizen,et al.  Pathogenic adaptation of Escherichia coli by natural variation of the FimH adhesin. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Eric J. Kunkel,et al.  Threshold Levels of Fluid Shear Promote Leukocyte Adhesion through Selectins (CD62L,P,E) , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  T. Springer,et al.  Selectin receptor-ligand bonds: Formation limited by shear rate and dissociation governed by the Bell model. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  D. Hammer,et al.  The forward rate of binding of surface-tethered reactants: effect of relative motion between two surfaces. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[12]  D. Torney,et al.  The reaction-limited kinetics of membrane-to-surface adhesion and detachment , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[13]  L. Hagberg,et al.  Adhesion, hemagglutination, and virulence of Escherichia coli causing urinary tract infections , 1981, Infection and immunity.

[14]  S. Hultgren,et al.  Bad bugs and beleaguered bladders: interplay between uropathogenic Escherichia coli and innate host defenses. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  J. M. Ross,et al.  Novel experimental study of receptor-mediated bacterial adhesion under the influence of fluid shear. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[16]  D. Hammer,et al.  The state diagram for cell adhesion under flow: leukocyte rolling and firm adhesion. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  S. Fisher,et al.  Quantifying the Strength of Bacterial Adhesive Interactions with Salivary Glycoproteins , 1995, Journal of dental research.

[18]  J. Pinkner,et al.  Type 1 pilus‐mediated bacterial invasion of bladder epithelial cells , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[19]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Low Force Decelerates L-selectin Dissociation from P-selectin Glycoprotein Ligand-1 and Endoglycan* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  E. Sokurenko,et al.  Diversity of the Escherichia coli Type 1 Fimbrial Lectin , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  R. Dickinson,et al.  Quantitative comparison of shear-dependent Staphylococcus aureus adhesion to three polyurethane ionomer analogs with distinct surface properties. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[22]  M. Shimaoka,et al.  Transition From Rolling to Firm Adhesion Is Regulated by the Conformation of the I Domain of the Integrin Lymphocyte Function-associated Antigen-1* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  E. Evans Probing the relation between force--lifetime--and chemistry in single molecular bonds. , 2001, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[24]  Lina M. Nilsson,et al.  A Catch-Bond Based Nanoadhesive Sensitive to Shear Stress , 2004 .

[25]  D. Hammer,et al.  Cell-free rolling mediated by L-selectin and sialyl Lewis(x) reveals the shear threshold effect. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[26]  A. Siitonen,et al.  Quantitative differences in adhesiveness of type 1 fimbriated Escherichia coli due to structural differences in fimH genes , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.

[27]  G. I. Bell Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.

[28]  E. Sokurenko,et al.  FimH family of type 1 fimbrial adhesins: functional heterogeneity due to minor sequence variations among fimH genes , 1994, Journal of bacteriology.

[29]  R. Isberg,et al.  Dancing with the Host Flow-Dependent Bacterial Adhesion , 2002, Cell.

[30]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Direct observation of catch bonds involving cell-adhesion molecules , 2003, Nature.

[31]  R. G. Cox,et al.  Slow viscous motion of a sphere parallel to a plane wall , 1967 .

[32]  Zhenglun Li,et al.  Shear Stress Affects the Kinetics of Staphylococcus aureus Adhesion to Collagen , 2000, Biotechnology progress.

[33]  Timothy A. Springer,et al.  An Automatic Braking System That Stabilizes Leukocyte Rolling by an Increase in Selectin Bond Number with Shear , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[34]  D. Brooks,et al.  Enhancement of bacterial adhesion by shear forces: characterization of the haemagglutination induced by Aeromonas salmonicida strain 438. , 1983, Journal of general microbiology.