Social Networks-based Adaptive Pairing Strategy for Cooperative Learning

In this paper, we propose a grouping strategy to enhance the learning and testing results of students, called Pairing Strategy (PS). The proposed method stems from the need of interactivity and the desire of cooperation in cooperative learning. Based on the social networks of students, PS provides members of the groups to learn from or mimic learners who have good relationships with them. As such, the learning achievement can be raised. Our experimental results show that the proposed method can provide a better learning result, especially when compared to grouping at random, because it enables low achievers to find more appropriate collaborators. More precisely, the experimental results show that the learning achievement of approximately 17.64% of the students is increased. The average score is increased from 79 to 91.9 while the standard deviation is decreased from 16.9 to 13.6.

[1]  D. Hancock.  Cooperative Learning and Peer Orientation Effects on Motivation and Achievement , 2004 .

[2]  A. Arnold,et al.  Mathematics for computer science , 1996 .

[3]  Paula Elizabeth Sanderson.  E-Learning: strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age , 2002 .

[4]  Robin Mason,et al.  e-Learning and Social Networking Handbook: Resources for Higher Education , 2008 .

[5]  Marc J. Rosenberg,et al.  E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age , 2000 .

[6]  Amer Diwan,et al.  Student culture vs group work in computer science , 2004, SIGCSE '04.

[7]  Laurie A. Williams,et al.  In Support of Pair Programming in the Introductory Computer Science Course , 2002, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[8]  Charles E. McDowell,et al.  Pair-programming helps female computer science students , 2004, JERC.

[9]  Charles E. McDowell,et al.  Program quality with pair programming in CS1 , 2004, ITiCSE '04.

[10]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Implementing Cooperative Learning. , 1992 .

[11]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Play, learning, and instruction , 1999 .

[12]  David W. Johnson.  The New Circles of Learning: Cooperation in the Classroom and School , 1994 .

[13]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research , 2000, TCHI.

[14]  Gour C. Karmakar,et al.  A dynamic Bezier curve model , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005.

[15]  David W. Johnson.  Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom , 1986 .

[16]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Learning Together and Alone. Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Fourth Edition. , 1991 .

[17]  Antony Stephen Reid Manstead,et al.  The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Psychology , 1996 .

[18]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[19]  C. Fosnot.  Constructivism : theory, perspectives, and practice , 1996 .

[20]  E. Lichtenstein.  Social learning. , 1977, NIDA research monograph.

[21]  R. Akers,et al.  Social Learning and Social Structure: A General Theory of Crime and Deviance. , 2000 .

[22]  Amruth N. Kumar,et al.  Proceedings of the 9th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 2004, Leeds, UK, June 28-30, 2004 , 2004, ITiCSE.

[23]  R. Leighton,et al.  Feynman Lectures on Physics , 1971 .

[24]  David W. Johnson,et al.  The State of Cooperative Learning in Postsecondary and Professional Settings , 2007 .

[25]  Laurie A. Williams,et al.  Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming , 2003, SIGCSE.

[26]  Charles E. McDowell,et al.  Experimenting with pair programming in the classroom , 2003, ITiCSE '03.

[27]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams , 2000 .

[28]  Simon Hooper,et al.  Cooperative CBI: The Effects of Heterogeneous versus Homogeneous Grouping on the Learning of Progressively Complex Concepts , 1988 .

[29]  Rachel Hertz-Lazarovits,et al.  Interaction in cooperative groups : the theoretical anatomy of group learning , 1992 .

[30]  F. Glen.  The social psychology of organizations , 1976 .

[31]  E. Aronson.  The Jigsaw Classroom , 1978 .

[32]  D. Krackhardt.  Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. , 1990 .

[33]  Irit Bar-Natan,et al.  Writing development of Arab and Jewish students using cooperative learning (CL) and computer-mediated communication (CMC) , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[34]  Wenji Mao,et al.  Social Learning , 2010, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[35]  Laurie A. Williams,et al.  In support of student pair-programming , 2001, SIGCSE '01.

[36]  Tammy VanDeGrift.  Coupling pair programming and writing: learning about students' perceptions and processes , 2004, SIGCSE.

[37]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory and individual and social transformation. , 1999 .

[38]  S. Peterson,et al.  Comparing the Quality of Students' Experiences During Cooperative Learning and Large-Group Instruction , 2004 .

[39]  Diane J. Hanson,et al.  E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age , 2003, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..