Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments.

New medical imaging devices, such as the CT scanner, have begun to challenge traditional role relations among radiologists and radiological technologists. Under some conditions, these technologies may actually alter the organizational and occupational structure of radiological work. However, current theories of technology and organizational form are insensitive to the potential number of structural variations implicit in role-based change. This paper expands recent sociological thought on the link between institution and action to outline a theory of how technology might occasion different organizational structures by altering institutionalized roles and patterns of interaction. In so doing, technology is treated as a social rather than a physical object, and structure is conceptualized as a process rather than an entity. The implications of the theory are illustrated by showing how identical CT scanners occasioned similar structuring processes in two radiology departments and yet led to divergent forms of organization. The data suggest that to understand how technologies alter organizational structures researchers may need to integrate the study of social action and the study of social form.

[1]  Vladimir Propp,et al.  Morphology of the folktale , 1959 .

[2]  E. Goffman The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[3]  Harold Rosenbaum,et al.  Modern Radiology in Historical Perspective , 1963 .

[4]  P. Blau Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[5]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[6]  D. Pugh,et al.  Operations Technology and Organization Structure: An Empirical Reappraisal , 1969 .

[7]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[8]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Organizational Technology and Organizational Structure. , 1971 .

[9]  Milton I. Roemer,et al.  Professional Dominance: The Social Structure of Medical Care , 1972 .

[10]  J. Child Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[11]  A. L. Bertrand,et al.  The Theory of Organizations. , 1972 .

[12]  C. A. Brown The Division of Laborers: Allied Health Professions , 1973, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[13]  P. Khandwalla Mass Output Orientation of Operations Technology and Organizational Structure. , 1974 .

[14]  A. Giddens NEW RULES OF SOCIOLOGICAL METHOD , 1980 .

[15]  P. Blau,et al.  Technology and Organization in Manufacturing , 1976 .

[16]  G. G. Stanfield Technology and Organization Structure as Theoretical Categories , 1976 .

[17]  W. R. Scott,et al.  Technology and the structure of subunits: distinguishing individual and workgroup effects. , 1977, Administrative science quarterly.

[18]  Scott Wr,et al.  Technology and the structure of subunits: distinguishing individual and workgroup effects. , 1977 .

[19]  M. Larson The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis , 1977 .

[20]  G V Larkin,et al.  Medical Dominance and Control: Radiographers in the Division of Labour , 1978, The Sociological review.

[21]  A. Giddens Central Problems In Social Theory , 1979 .

[22]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[23]  Graeme Salaman,et al.  Control and Ideology in Organizations , 1982 .

[24]  L W Fry,et al.  Technology-structure research: three critical issues. , 1982, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[25]  Peter K. Manning,et al.  Organizational Work: Structuration of Environments , 1982 .

[26]  A. Meyer Adapting to environmental jolts. , 1982, Administrative science quarterly.

[27]  Patricia Riley,et al.  A Structurationist Account of Political Culture , 1983 .

[28]  Stephen R Barley The professional, the semi-professional, and the machines : the social ramifications of computer based imaging in radiology , 1984 .