Pesticide Pollution in the Brazilian Pampa: Detrimental Impacts on Ecosystems and Human Health in a Neglected Biome

The Brazilian Pampa biome covers half of Rio Grande do Sul state, in the extreme south of Brazil, creating an ecotone zone with the Atlantic Forest and bordering Pampa’s territory belonging to Uruguay and Argentina. Pampa is a non-forest biome mainly composed of grasslands and mosaics of grassland-forest vegetation. This biome shows significant animal and plant diversity, contributing to the maintenance of important ecosystem services, including CO2 capture, pollination, and water cycle regulation. However, forestry plantations, inappropriate cattle ranching, mining activities, unplanned urbanization, and the cultivation of monocultures (soy, rice, tobacco, and other cash crops) significantly threaten the conservation of the Pampa biome. A major problem observed in the Pampa, due to the great connection of this biome with agricultural areas, is pesticide pollution, which significantly affects the health of humans and animals that occupy the region. A robust body of evidence indicates that aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems in the Brazilian Pampa are extensively contaminated with pesticides, as indicated by studies involving animal biomarkers and pesticide analyses performed on water and soil samples. Human studies also suggest that pesticides affect different body systems, facilitating the onset of various chronic diseases. Brazil’s conservation actions and policies have a special focus on forest ecosystems, neglecting non-forest biomes and thus aggravating the problems related to Pampa’s conservation. In this article, we discuss some problems caused by pesticide pollution in the Brazilian Pampa, drawing attention to the need for intensification of policies focused on the promotion of human and environmental health. Finally, we suggest the bioecological bioeconomy as an alternative for Rio Grande do Sul to progress its economic development but with less dependency on detrimental activities to the Pampa biome.

[1]  M. Adaime,et al.  Biomarkers’ Responses of Rhamdia quelen Exposed In Situ on a Brazilian River Located in Agricultural Areas , 2023, Water, Air, & Soil Pollution.

[2]  G. Goyenola,et al.  Multicompartmental monitoring of legacy and currently used pesticides in a subtropical lake used as a drinking water source (Laguna del Cisne, Uruguay). , 2023, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  G. Brown,et al.  12,500+ and counting: biodiversity of the Brazilian Pampa , 2023, Frontiers of Biogeography.

[4]  C. Nobre,et al.  Brazilian Biodiversity as a Source of Power and Sustainable Development: A Neglected Opportunity , 2022, Sustainability.

[5]  J. Ellwanger,et al.  Protect Brazil’s overlooked Pampa biome , 2022, Science.

[6]  J. Ellwanger,et al.  Examining the paradox of urban disease ecology by linking the perspectives of Urban One Health and Ecology with Cities , 2022, Urban ecosystems.

[7]  F. Silveira,et al.  Placing Brazil's grasslands and savannas on the map of science and conservation , 2022, Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics.

[8]  A. Cohen,et al.  Pollution and health: a progress update. , 2022, The Lancet. Planetary health.

[9]  J. Vitule,et al.  Brazilian pesticides law could poison the world , 2022, Science.

[10]  G. Schultz,et al.  OS CANAIS DE DISTRIBUIÇÃO ON-LINE DE ALIMENTOS ORGÂNICOS NA REGIÃO METROPOLITANA EM PORTO ALEGRE , 2022, Anais do 59º Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administração e Sociologia Rural (SOBER) e 6º Encontro Brasileiro de Pesquisadores em Cooperativismo (EBPC).

[11]  E. Périco,et al.  Agricultural land use affects the heterogeneity of Odonata communities in the Brazilian Pampa , 2021, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[12]  R. Buralli,et al.  Mortality and morbidity by work-related pesticide poisoning in Brazil, 2009-2019 , 2021, ISEE Conference Abstracts.

[13]  L. Bragagnolo,et al.  Mobility and environmental monitoring of pesticides in the atmosphere — a review , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[14]  A. McBratney,et al.  Risk of pesticide pollution at the global scale , 2021, Nature Geoscience.

[15]  R. Sadler,et al.  Agriculture Development, Pesticide Application and Its Impact on the Environment , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[16]  D. Pérez,et al.  Ecological risk assessment of current-use pesticides and biocides in soils, sediments and surface water of a mixed land-use basin of the Pampas region, Argentina. , 2021, Chemosphere.

[17]  C. Bertoldi,et al.  First evidence of microplastic contamination in the freshwater of Lake Guaíba, Porto Alegre, Brazil. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  T. E. Müller,et al.  Ecological impacts of pesticides on Astyanax jacuhiensis (Characiformes: Characidae) from the Uruguay river, Brazil. , 2020, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[19]  F. Anjos,et al.  Redes agroalimentares alternativas e consumo crítico: o caso das feiras orgânicas de Porto Alegre , 2020 .

[20]  P. Fearnside,et al.  Beyond diversity loss and climate change: Impacts of Amazon deforestation on infectious diseases and public health. , 2020, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias.

[21]  R. R. Moura,et al.  Distribution of pesticides in agricultural and urban soils of Brazil: a critical review. , 2020, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[22]  M. Zafar,et al.  “Modern agriculture” transfers many pesticides to watercourses: a case study of a representative rural catchment of southern Brazil , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[23]  M. Nunes,et al.  Ecological risk of pesticide contamination in a Brazilian river located near a rural area: A study of biomarkers using zebrafish embryos. , 2019, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[24]  F. Iturburu,et al.  Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) of pesticides from freshwater ecosystems in the Pampas region of Argentina: Legacy and current use chemicals contribution. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[25]  Lara C. Lopes,et al.  Brazil unwisely gives pesticides a free pass , 2019, Science.

[26]  R. Ostfeld,et al.  Emerging human infectious diseases and the links to global food production , 2019, Nature Sustainability.

[27]  Elenita Malta Pereira.  Movimentos ambientalistas no Rio Grande Do Sul (décadas 1970-80) , 2018, Oficina do Historiador.

[28]  Juliana Mazurana.  Povos e comunidades tradicionais do pampa: visibilizando resistências , 2018, Ethnoscientia - Brazilian Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology.

[29]  H. Treichel,et al.  Quality of Meliponinae honey: Pesticides residues, pollen identity, and microbiological profiles , 2018, Environmental Quality Management.

[30]  S. Essack.  Environment: the neglected component of the One Health triad , 2018, The Lancet Planetary Health.

[31]  Guilherme Souza Cavalcanti de Albuquerque,et al.  Agrotóxicos e seus impactos na saúde humana e ambiental: uma revisão sistemática , 2018, Saúde em Debate.

[32]  L. Carrasco-Letelier,et al.  Agricultural pesticides and veterinary substances in Uruguayan beeswax. , 2017, Chemosphere.

[33]  Clandio Favarini Ruviaro,et al.  Agricultural land use change in the Brazilian Pampa Biome: The reduction of natural grasslands , 2017 .

[34]  Liegang Liu,et al.  Pesticide exposure and risk of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[35]  R. Rodrigues,et al.  Honey Bee Gut Microbiome Is Altered by In-Hive Pesticide Exposures , 2016, Front. Microbiol..

[36]  Markus M. Bugge,et al.  What Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature , 2016 .

[37]  A. Nogueira,et al.  Pesticides in Brazilian freshwaters: a critical review. , 2016, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[38]  C. Ockleford.  Guidance to develop specific protection goals options for environmental risk assessment at EFSA, in relation to biodiversity and ecosystem services , 2016 .

[39]  J. L. D. Cruz,et al.  Usos da terra e ameaças para a conservação da biodiversidade no bioma Pampa, Rio Grande do Sul , 2016 .

[40]  C. Jacobi,et al.  Conservation in Brazil needs to include non‐forest ecosystems , 2015 .

[41]  M. Adaime,et al.  A simple and efficient method for imidazolinone herbicides determination in soil by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. , 2015, Journal of chromatography. A.

[42]  J. Franco,et al.  Assessment of water pollution in the Brazilian Pampa biome by means of stress biomarkers in tadpoles of the leaf frog Phyllomedusa iheringii (Anura: Hylidae) , 2015, PeerJ.

[43]  I. K. Martins,et al.  Oxidative stress markers in fish (Astyanax sp. and Danio rerio) exposed to urban and agricultural effluents in the Brazilian Pampa biome , 2015, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[44]  J. Franco,et al.  Assessment of Water Pollution Signs in the Brazilian Pampa Biome Using Stress Biomarkers in Fish (Astyanax sp.) , 2015 .

[45]  E. Cummins,et al.  Evaluation of “Classic” and Emerging Contaminants Resulting from the Application of Biosolids to Agricultural Lands: A Review , 2015 .

[46]  J. P. Pêgas Henriques,et al.  Selenium reduces bradykinesia and DNA damage in a rat model of Parkinson's disease. , 2015, Nutrition.

[47]  I. Delcour,et al.  Literature review: Impact of climate change on pesticide use , 2015 .

[48]  A. Fassa,et al.  Association between pesticide exposure and suicide rates in Brazil. , 2014, Neurotoxicology.

[49]  R. M. Rigotto,et al.  Pesticide use in Brazil and problems for public health. , 2014, Cadernos de saude publica.

[50]  Blessy B. Mathew,et al.  Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals , 2014, Interdisciplinary toxicology.

[51]  C. E. Copatti,et al.  Aves em Ecótono Mata Atlântica-Pampa no Sul do Brasil , 2014 .

[52]  H. Köhler,et al.  Wildlife Ecotoxicology of Pesticides: Can We Track Effects to the Population Level and Beyond? , 2013, Science.

[53]  J. Dias,et al.  Genetic damage in soybean workers exposed to pesticides: evaluation with the comet and buccal micronucleus cytome assays. , 2013, Mutation research.

[54]  M. Bonner,et al.  Increased cancer burden among pesticide applicators and others due to pesticide exposure , 2013, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[55]  Richard J. Gill,et al.  Combined pesticide exposure severely affects individual- and colony-level traits in bees , 2012, Nature.

[56]  Andy Hart,et al.  Development of a framework based on an ecosystem services approach for deriving specific protection goals for environmental risk assessment of pesticides. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[57]  B. Sitaula,et al.  Continuing Issues in the Limitations of Pesticide Use in Developing Countries , 2011 .

[58]  Esteban G. Jobbágy,et al.  Ecological and environmental footprint of 50 years of agricultural expansion in Argentina , 2011 .

[59]  K. Welsh-Bohmer,et al.  Occupational exposure to pesticides increases the risk of incident AD , 2010, Neurology.

[60]  J. Kiesecker.  Global stressors and the global decline of amphibians: tipping the stress immunocompetency axis , 2010, Ecological Research.

[61]  F. C. Vieira,et al.  The Brazilian Pampa: A Fragile Biome , 2009 .

[62]  R. Barbieri,et al.  Características ornamentais de plantas do Bioma Pampa , 2009 .

[63]  Luciano Basso da Silva,et al.  Cytogenetic biomonitoring of Brazilian workers exposed to pesticides: micronucleus analysis in buccal epithelial cells of soybean growers. , 2009, Mutation research.

[64]  A. Remor,et al.  Occupational exposure of farm workers to pesticides: biochemical parameters and evaluation of genotoxicity. , 2009, Environment international.

[65]  A. Schotthoefer,et al.  Agrochemicals increase trematode infections in a declining amphibian species , 2008, Nature.

[66]  Eden R Martin,et al.  Pesticide exposure and risk of Parkinson's disease: A family-based case-control study , 2008, BMC neurology.

[67]  Valério D. Pillar,et al.  Brazil's neglected biome: The South Brazilian Campos , 2007 .

[68]  M. Thun,et al.  Pesticide exposure and risk for Parkinson's disease , 2006, Annals of neurology.

[69]  C. Victora,et al.  [Epidemiological aspects of suicide in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil]. , 2004, Revista de saude publica.

[70]  Clement A. Tisdell,et al.  Why farmers continue to use pesticides despite environmental, health and sustainability costs , 2001 .

[71]  Christine Hackel,et al.  Instabilidade cromossomica induzida por agroquimicos em trabalhadores rurais da região de Passo Fundo-RS , 2000 .

[72]  P. Fearnside,et al.  Synthesizing the connections between environmental disturbances and zoonotic spillover. , 2022, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias.

[73]  R. Limberger,et al.  Suicide mortality in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil: a cross-sectional analysis of cases, 2017-2018. , 2020, Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil.

[74]  Vanda Garibotti,et al.  Characterization of notifications of exogenous pesticide poisoning in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 2011-2018. , 2020, Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil.

[75]  Robert J. Zydenbos.  Paṃpa , 2020, Kindlers Literatur Lexikon (KLL).

[76]  M. G. Pignatti,et al.  Spatial distribution of pesticide use in Brazil: a strategy for Health Surveillance , 2017 .

[77]  C. Corvalan,et al.  Preventing disease through healthy environments: a global assessment of the burden of disease from environmental risks , 2016 .

[78]  Lucimar de Fátima dos Santos Vieira.  A valoração da beleza cênica da paisagem do bioma pampa do Rio Grande do Sul : proposição conceitual e metodológica , 2014 .

[79]  R. Myster,et al.  Ecotones Between Forest and Grassland , 2012, Springer New York.

[80]  J. M. Oliveira,et al.  South Brazilian Forest-Grassland Ecotones: Dynamics Affected by Climate, Disturbance, and Woody Species Traits , 2012 .

[81]  A. Carrion.  Eudicotiledôneas ornamentais dos campos do bioma pampa , 2008 .