Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control

This paper studies two fundamentally distinct approaches to opening a technology platform and their different impacts on innovation. One approach is to grant access to a platform and thereby open up markets for complementary components around the platform. Another approach is to give up control over the platform itself. Using data on 21 handheld computing systems (1990--2004), I find that granting greater levels of access to independent hardware developer firms produces up to a fivefold acceleration in the rate of new handheld device development, depending on the precise degree of access and how this policy was implemented. Where operating system platform owners went further to give up control (beyond just granting access to their platforms) the incremental effect on new device development was still positive but an order of magnitude smaller. The evidence from the industry and theoretical arguments both suggest that distinct economic mechanisms were set in motion by these two approaches to opening.

[1]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The power of modularity , 2000 .

[2]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Of Mice and Academics: Examining the Effect of Openness on Innovation , 2009 .

[3]  J. West,et al.  The Economic Realities of Open Standards : Black , White and Many Shades of Gray Joel West , 2005 .

[4]  Joacim Tåg,et al.  Open Versus Closed Platforms , 2008 .

[5]  K. Boudreau,et al.  How to Manage Outside Innovation , 2009 .

[6]  Ramon Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  Dynamic Mixed Duopoly: A Model Motivated by Linux vs. Windows , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Lamar Pierce.  Big Losses in Ecosystem Niches: How Core Firm Decisions Drive Complementary Product Shakeouts , 2009 .

[8]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Community, Joining, and Specialization in Open Source Software Innovation: A Case Study , 2003 .

[9]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability , 2004 .

[10]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community , 2007 .

[11]  A. Gawer,et al.  Platform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Intel , 2005 .

[12]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization , 1994 .

[13]  P. Rey,et al.  Abuse of Dominance and Licensing of Intellectual Property , 2008 .

[14]  D. Teece.  Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation☆ , 1996 .

[15]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Faster, smaller, cheaper: an hedonic price analysis of PDAs , 2004 .

[16]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  The Vertical Organization of Industry: Systems Competition versus Component Competition , 1998 .

[17]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Innovation, openness & platform control , 2010, EC '10.

[18]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Two-Sided Competition of Proprietary vs. Open Source Technology Platforms and the Implications for the Software Industry , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[19]  Robert P. Merges.  IP Rights and Technological Platforms , 2008 .

[20]  Antoine Martin,et al.  Barriers to Network-Specific Investment , 2007 .

[21]  Lior Jacob Strahilevitz,et al.  Information Asymmetries and the Rights to Exclude , 2005 .

[22]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Network Externalities, Complementarities, and Invitations to Enter , 1996 .

[23]  Richard N. Langlois.  Standards and Public Policy: Competition through institutional form: the case of cluster tool standards , 2006 .

[24]  Jeffrey T. Macher.  Technological Development and the Boundaries of the Firm: A Knowledge-Based Examination in Semiconductor Manufacturing , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[25]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Innovation, Rent Extraction, and Integration in Systems Markets , 2000 .

[27]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The Power of Product Platforms , 1997 .

[28]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software , 2005 .

[29]  A. Gawer.  Platforms, Markets and Innovation , 2011 .

[30]  Harikesh S. Nair,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Indirect Network Effects in the Market for Personal Digital Assistants , 2004 .

[31]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Systems Competition and Network Effects , 1994 .

[32]  David Pogue,et al.  Piloting Palm: The Inside Story of Palm, Handspring, and the Birth of the Billion-Dollar Handheld Industry , 2002 .

[33]  Shane Greenstein,et al.  Open Platform Development and the Commercial Internet , 2009 .

[34]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Platform leadership , 2002 .

[35]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  A Survey of the Economic Role of Software Platforms in Computer-Based Industries , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[36]  Chi-Hyon Lee,et al.  Preferential Linkage and Network Evolution: A Conceptual Model and Empirical Test in the U.S. Video Game Sector , 2004 .

[37]  Juanjuan Zhang,et al.  Growing Two-Sided Networks by Advertising the User Base: A Field Experiment , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[38]  R. Garud,et al.  Technological and Organizational Designs for Realizing Economies of Substitution , 1997 .

[39]  Philip J. Weiser,et al.  Modularity, Vertical Integration, and Open Access Policies: Towards a Convergence of Antitrust and Regulation in the Internet Age , 2003 .

[40]  Ramon Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  Palm (A): The Debate on Licensing Palm's OS (1997) , 2008 .

[41]  Shane Greenstein,et al.  Coordination versus Differentiation in a Standards War , 2006 .

[42]  Robert K. Perrons,et al.  The open kimono: How Intel balances trust and power to maintain platform leadership , 2009 .

[43]  Oscar Hauptman,et al.  Platform leadership , 2002 .

[44]  Richard N. Langlois,et al.  External Economies and Economic Progress: The Case of the Microcomputer Industry , 1992, Business History Review.

[45]  C. Wolter,et al.  The Effects of Innovation on Vertical Structure: Perspectives on Transaction Costs and Competences , 2008 .

[46]  Marc Rysman,et al.  Coordination vs. Differentiation in a Standards War: 56k Modems , 2004 .

[47]  Richard N. Langlois,et al.  Competition Through Institutional Form: The Case of Cluster Tool Standards , 2004 .

[48]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity Volume 1 , 1999 .

[49]  R. Heeb,et al.  Innovation and Vertical Integration in Complementary Markets , 2003 .

[50]  Steven J. Davis,et al.  A Competitive Perspective on Internet Explorer , 2000 .

[51]  M. Cusumano,et al.  Strategic Maneuvering and Mass-Market Dynamics: The Triumph of VHS over Beta , 1992, Business History Review.

[52]  Ruth Milkman,et al.  Microsoft Secrets: How the World's Most Powerful Software Company Creates Technology, Shapes Markets, and Manages People , 1995 .

[53]  P. Regibeau,et al.  Mix and Match: Product Compatibility Without Network Externalities , 2011 .

[54]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  How open should an open system be? essays on mobile computing , 2006 .

[55]  Geoffrey H. Moore,et al.  The National Bureau of Economic Research , 1950 .

[56]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Proprietary vs. Open Two-Sided Platforms and Social Efficiency , 2006 .

[57]  Volker Nocke,et al.  Platform Ownership , 2004 .

[58]  Michael Kende,et al.  Profitability under an Open versus a Closed System , 1998 .

[59]  Urs Von Burg,et al.  The Triumph of Ethernet: Technological Communities and the Battle for the LAN Standard , 2002 .

[60]  Jae Hyon Nahm.  Open Architecture and R&D Incentives , 2004 .

[61]  Jerry Kaplan,et al.  Startup: A Silicon Valley Adventure , 1995 .

[62]  Joseph Farrell.  Standards and Public Policy: Should competition policy favor compatibility? , 2006 .

[63]  David B. Yoffie,et al.  Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence , 1997 .

[64]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Satisfying Heterogeneous User Needs Via Innovation Toolkits: The Case of Apache Security Software , 2002 .

[65]  S. Fixson,et al.  The Power of Integrality: Linkages between Product Architecture, Innovation, and Industry Structure , 2007 .

[66]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Platform Rules: Multi-Sided Platforms as Regulators , 2008 .

[67]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Regression Analysis of Count Data , 1998 .

[68]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[69]  Jay Pil Choi,et al.  The Effects of Integration on R&D Incentives in Systems Markets , 2003 .

[70]  J. Tirole,et al.  Some Simple Economics of Open Source , 2002 .

[71]  Shane M. Greenstein,et al.  Invisible hands versus invisible advisors : coordination mechanisms in economic networks / 1993:111 , 1993 .

[72]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[73]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[74]  C R Morris,et al.  How architecture wins technology wars. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[75]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[76]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Opening Platforms: How, When and Why? , 2008 .

[77]  Daniel F. Spulber.  Unlocking Technology: Antitrust and Innovation , 2008 .

[78]  Joel West,et al.  How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies , 2003 .

[79]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[80]  Jean-Charles Rochet,et al.  Two-Sided Markets: An Overview ∗ , 2004 .

[81]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View , 2008 .

[82]  Peng Huang,et al.  Participation in a Platform Ecosystem: Appropriability, Competition and Access to the Installed Base , 2009 .

[83]  M. Jacobides,et al.  Benefiting from Innovation: Value Creation, Value Appropriation and the Role of Industry Architectures , 2006 .

[84]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[85]  Timothy S. Simcoe.  Standard Setting Committees: Consensus Governance for Shared Technology Platforms , 2010 .

[86]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[87]  Marc Rysman.  The Economics of Two-Sided Markets , 2009 .

[88]  J. T. Wulu,et al.  Regression analysis of count data , 2002 .

[89]  B. Kogut,et al.  Technological Platforms and Diversification , 1996 .

[90]  Nancy Gallini,et al.  Second-sourcing as a Commitment: Monopoly Incentives to Attract Competition - eScholarship , 1986 .

[91]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The product family and the dynamics of core capability , 1992 .

[92]  Andras Niedermayer,et al.  On Platforms, Incomplete Contracts, and Open Source Software , 2013 .

[93]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Technological Competition and the Structure of the Computer Industry , 2003 .

[94]  Ramon Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  Open Versus Closed Innovation: A Model of Discovery and Divergence , 2010 .

[95]  George Westerman,et al.  Disruption, disintegration and the dissipation of differentiability , 2002 .

[96]  J. Wooldridge.  Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models , 1999 .

[97]  Shane Greenstein,et al.  Standards and Public Policy , 2006 .

[98]  Zahed Siddique,et al.  Product Platform and Product Family Design , 2006 .

[99]  Farasat A. S. Bokhari.  Open Versus Closed Firms and the Dynamics of Industry Evolution , 2007 .

[100]  Sandra Slaughter,et al.  Understanding the Motivations, Participation, and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[101]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Does Opening a Platform Stimulate Innovation? The Effect on Systemic and Modular Innovations , 2007 .

[102]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality , 1992 .

[103]  Luigi Paganetto,et al.  The determinants of suboptimal technological development in the system company–component producers relationship , 2001 .