Phase I trial of intraperitoneal iododeoxyuridine with and without intravenous high-dose folinic acid in the treatment of advanced malignancies primarily confined to the peritoneal cavity: flow cytometric and pharmacokinetic analysis.

In this Phase I study, the maximally tolerated doses (MTDs) of i.p. iododeoxyuridine (IdUrd) alone and in combination with i.v. calcium leucovorin (LV) were determined. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacological advantage of IdUrd were evaluated, and flow cytometric analysis allowed examination of the extent of incorporation of IdUrd into tumor cells with and without the addition of i.v. LV. Thirty-nine patients with advanced neoplasms primarily confined to the peritoneal space were enrolled in a dose-escalation trial using 4-h dwells of IdUrd administered i.p. daily for 4 days with and without an i.v. infusion of LV 500 mg/m2/day for 4.5 days. Twenty-three patients received single-agent therapy, and 13 patients received i.p. IdUrd in combination with i.v. LV. The MTD of single-agent IdUrd administered on this schedule was 4125 mg/m2/day for 4 days; and that of the IdUrd in combination was 3438 mg/m2/day. Dose-limiting toxicities were myelosuppression and stomatitis. During the period of the dwell, the peritoneal AUC (area under the curve) of IdUrd exceeded the plasma AUC of IdUrd by one or two orders of magnitude in all patients at all doses tested; there was a possible effect of LV on peritoneal AUC. The geometric mean pharmacological advantage (AUCperitoneal/ AUCplasma) was 181 at 625 mg/m2/day and 90 at 4538 mg/m2/day. Flow cytometric analysis suggests saturation of IdUrd measured in DNA at the 2500-3125 mg/m2 dose level, without an increase after the addition of LV. Twelve patients received 4-12 courses of therapy. One patient with recurrent ovarian cancer who received 16 courses of therapy experienced complete resolution of her ascites, near normalization of CA-125 levels, and improved quality of life; two patients with high-risk tumors receiving "adjuvant" therapy are disease-free at 3 and 6 years after treatment; other patients experienced transient clearing of ascites. The recommended Phase II dose of i.p. IdUrd using a 4-h dwell daily for 4 days is 3750 mg/m2/day alone or 3125 mg/m2/day in combination with continuous i.v. LV at 500 mg/m2/day for 4.5 days. Although flow cytometric data suggest that DNA incorporation of IdUrd is not affected by the addition of LV, the cytotoxicity of the combination regimen may be increased due to LV-enhanced, IdUrd-related inhibition of thymidylate synthase. For this reason, we recommend that efficacy studies of the combination continue in parallel with studies of IdUrd alone.

[1]  R. Klevecz,et al.  Replication synchrony-PCR: a sampling-time-independent assay for replication synchrony in human tissues and tumors in situ. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  D. Alberts,et al.  Intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  M. Lindstrom,et al.  Leucovorin modulation of 5-iododeoxyuridine radiosensitization: a phase I study. , 1996, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[4]  F M Muggia,et al.  Intraperitoneal mitoxantrone or floxuridine: effects on time-to-failure and survival in patients with minimal residual ovarian cancer after second-look laparotomy--a randomized phase II study by theSouthwest Oncology Group. , 1996, Gynecologic oncology.

[5]  R. Barakat,et al.  Phase I trial of intraperitoneal taxol: a Gynecoloic Oncology Group study. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  J. Collins,et al.  Effects of leucovorin on idoxuridine cytotoxicity and DNA incorporation. , 1990, Cancer research.

[7]  T. Phillips,et al.  Correlation of exposure time, concentration and incorporation of IdUrd in V-79 cells with radiation response. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  K. Bélanger,et al.  Iododeoxyuridine (IdUrd) incorporation into DNA of human hematopoietic cells, normal liver and hepatic metastases in man: as a radiosensitizer and as a marker for cell kinetic studies. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  J. Doroshow,et al.  Refractory metastatic breast cancer: salvage therapy with fluorouracil and high-dose continuous infusion leucovorin calcium. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  M. Piver,et al.  Surgically documented response to intraperitoneal cisplatin, cytarabine, and bleomycin after intravenous cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced ovarian adenocarcinoma. , 1988, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  M. Markman Chemotherapy in ovarian carcinoma: intravenous or intraperitoneal? , 1988, Hematology/oncology clinics of North America.

[12]  K. Bélanger,et al.  Fluorodeoxyuridine modulation of the incorporation of iododeoxyuridine into DNA of granulocytes: a phase I and clinical pharmacological study. , 1988, Cancer research.

[13]  R. Klevecz,et al.  Circadian gating of S phase in human ovarian cancer. , 1987, Cancer research.

[14]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[15]  T. Kinsella,et al.  A phase I study of intravenous iododeoxyuridine as a clinical radiosensitizer. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  R. Fine,et al.  Clinical pharmacology of 5‐iodo‐2′‐deoxyuridine and 5‐iodouracil and endogenous pyrimidine modulation , 1985, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[17]  T. Kinsella,et al.  Continuous intravenous infusions of bromodeoxyuridine as a clinical radiosensitizer. , 1984, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  E. Frei,et al.  Dose: a critical factor in cancer chemotherapy. , 1980, The American journal of medicine.

[19]  C. Heidelberger,et al.  INCORPORATION OF I-125-LABELED IODODEOXYURIDINE INTO THE DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACID OF MURINE AND HUMAN TISSUES FOLLOWING THERAPEUTIC DOSES. , 1963, Cancer research.

[20]  M. Kligerman,et al.  Initial clinical studies with 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine. , 1961, Cancer research.

[21]  W. Szybalski,et al.  GENETICS OF HUMAN CELL LINES III. INCORPORATION OF 5-BROMO- AND 5-IODODEOXYHRIDINE INTO THE DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACID OF HUMAN CELLS AND ITS EFFECT ON RADIATION SENSITIVITY , 1960 .

[22]  R. Morgan,et al.  Circadian optimization of treatment time using DNA replication-dependent cell-cycle-specific halogenated pyrimidines. , 1995, The Journal of infusional chemotherapy.

[23]  W. Peters High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow support for breast cancer. , 1991, Important advances in oncology.

[24]  W. Hryniuk The importance of dose intensity in the outcome of chemotherapy. , 1988, Important advances in oncology.

[25]  R. Ozols Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of ovarian cancer. , 1985, Seminars in oncology.

[26]  J. Speyer The rationale behind intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastrointestinal malignancies. , 1985, Seminars in oncology.

[27]  James B. Mitchell,et al.  A Phase I study of intermittent intravenous bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) with conventional fractionated irradiation. , 1984, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  W. Prusoff Synthesis and biological activities of iododeoxyuridine, an analog of thymidine. , 1959, Biochimica et biophysica acta.