An integrated solution with SWARA&COPRAS methods in renewable energy production: City selection for biogas facility

Abstract In today's world, where the demand for energy has increased and the supply/demand balance for energy has become increasingly difficult, the role of renewable energy is quite important. One of the most important sources of renewable energy in the world is the biogas, which offers great contributions to prevent environmental pollution and ensure ecological balance. Because Turkey has the necessary resources for the production of biogas, it is a popular country for the establishment of biogas production facility, which has a great importance from renewable energy sources. The aim of this study is appropriate city selection for a new biogas facility which will be an alternative to already existing biogas production facilities in Turkey. The study focuses on the identification of renewable energy potentials by evaluating 3 cities with rich and diverse characteristics in terms of biomass quantity. In this paper, a model with 12 criteria which affects the evaluation of the alternatives is proposed for selecting the suitable city in Turkey for biogas production with proposed solution method. In proposed methodology, the SWARA method, which uses the ranking of each decision maker, is used in the first phase of the solution in which the importance weights of the criteria in the model are determined. After obtaining criteria weights with SWARA method, for selecting appropriate city to establish a biogas facility, COPRAS method is used that is a one of multi criteria decision making method. The proposed model is showed by an illustrative example and the results are explained.

[1]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Evaluating construction projects of hotels based on environmental sustainability with MCDM framework , 2017 .

[2]  Tiago Neves Sequeira,et al.  Renewable energy and politics: A systematic review and new evidence , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[3]  Zhang-peng Tian,et al.  Risk evaluation by FMEA of supercritical water gasification system using multi-granular linguistic distribution assessment , 2018, Knowl. Based Syst..

[4]  B. Sarker,et al.  Modeling and optimization of a supply chain of renewable biomass and biogas: Processing plant location , 2019, Applied Energy.

[5]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Sustainable Development of Rural Areas’ Building Structures Based on Local Climate , 2013 .

[6]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Proposing a new integrated model based on sustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC) and MCDM approaches by using linguistic variables for the performance evaluation of oil producing companies , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Samuel Olorunfemi Adams,et al.  Renewable and non-renewable energy, regime type and economic growth , 2018, Renewable Energy.

[8]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Severity assessment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic COPRAS method , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[9]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  An extended stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) method for improving criteria prioritization process , 2018, Soft Comput..

[10]  David M. Wall,et al.  An energy and greenhouse gas comparison of centralised biogas production with road haulage of pig slurry, and decentralised biogas production with biogas transportation in a low-pressure pipe network , 2017 .

[11]  I. Ferrer,et al.  A multi-criteria decision support tool for the assessment of household biogas digester programmes in rural areas. A case study in Peru , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[12]  C. Mbohwa,et al.  Multi-Criteria Analysis of Different Technologies for the Bioenergy Recovery from OFMSW , 2016 .

[13]  A-Xing Zhu,et al.  Flood susceptibility assessment in Hengfeng area coupling adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with genetic algorithm and differential evolution. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  Ching-Ter Chang,et al.  Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[15]  S. Zolfani,et al.  Investment prioritizing in high tech industries based on SWARA-COPRAS approach , 2014 .

[16]  Geoffrey McCullough,et al.  What is the most energy efficient route for biogas utilization: Heat, electricity or transport? , 2017 .

[17]  Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani,et al.  A novel hybrid SWARA and VIKOR methodology for supplier selection in an agile environment , 2013 .

[18]  Frede Blaabjerg,et al.  Renewable energy resources: Current status, future prospects and their enabling technology , 2014 .

[19]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Materials selection using COPRAS and COPRAS-G methods , 2012 .

[20]  Mahdi Bitarafan,et al.  Evaluation of light supply in the public underground safe spaces by using of COPRAS-SWARA methods , 2016 .

[21]  Bindu Madhuri,et al.  Selection of Best Web Site by Applying COPRAS-G method , 2010 .

[22]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multicriteria evaluation of apartment blocks maintenance contractors: Lithuanian case study , 2009 .

[23]  Mutlu Yilmaz Türkiye’nin enerji potansiyeli ve yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının elektrik enerjisi üretimi açısından önemi , 2012 .

[24]  T. Nuuter,et al.  Comparison of Housing Market Sustainability in European Countries Based on Multiple Criteria Assessment , 2015 .

[25]  Luis C. Dias,et al.  Biogas plants site selection integrating Multicriteria Decision Aid methods and GIS techniques: a case study in a Portuguese region. , 2014 .

[26]  Iman Nasiri Aghdam,et al.  A new hybrid model using Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) technique and Adaptive Neuro-fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) for regional landslide hazard assessment in Iran , 2015 .

[27]  E. Phlips,et al.  Techno-Economic Analysis of Biogas Production from Microalgae through Anaerobic Digestion , 2019, Anaerobic Digestion.

[28]  Measuring the cost of renewable energy in Germany , 2018 .

[29]  J. Lyytimäki Renewable energy in the news: Environmental, economic, policy and technology discussion of biogas , 2018, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[30]  Maizirwan Mel,et al.  Simulation Study for Economic Analysis of Biogas Production from Agricultural Biomass , 2015 .

[31]  Semida Silveira,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of small scale biogas based polygeneration systems: Bangladesh case study , 2014 .

[32]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  A novel hybrid social media platform selection model using fuzzy ANP and COPRAS-G , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[33]  Mariano Martín,et al.  Renewable based biogas upgrading , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[34]  Majid Vafaeipour,et al.  Assessment of regions priority for implementation of solar projects in Iran: New application of a hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach , 2014 .

[35]  Hadi Ghaderi,et al.  Sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider evaluation and selection using fuzzy SWARA and developed fuzzy COPRAS in the presence of risk criteria , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[36]  J. Z. Thellufsen,et al.  The electricity market in a renewable energy system , 2018, Energy.

[37]  Dragisa Stanujkic,et al.  Ranking of companies according to the indicators of corporate social responsibility based on SWARA and ARAS methods , 2016 .

[38]  Maher M. Al-Maghalseh Techno-economic assessment of biogas energy from animal wastes in central areas of Palestine: Bethlehem perspective , 2018, International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies.

[39]  Norhazilan Md Noor,et al.  Hybrid SWARA-COPRAS method for risk assessment in deep foundation excavation project: an Iranian case study , 2017 .

[40]  R. Ebrahimi,et al.  Assess a new strategy and develop a new mixer to improve anaerobic microbial activities and clean biogas production , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[41]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara) , 2010 .

[42]  Nadia Maïzi,et al.  The renewable energy revolution of reunion island , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[43]  Ted K.A. Brekken,et al.  Reserve requirement impacts of large-scale integration of wind, solar, and ocean wave power generation , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[44]  Mark Z. Jacobson,et al.  Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part I: Technologies, energy resources, quantities and areas of infrastructure, and materials , 2011 .

[45]  Vishal Sardeshpande,et al.  Multi-criteria Analysis of Alternative Biogas Technologies , 2014 .

[46]  Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani,et al.  Glasshouse locating based on SWARA-COPRAS approach , 2015 .

[47]  Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani,et al.  New Application of SWARA Method in Prioritizing Sustainability Assessment Indicators of Energy System , 2014 .

[48]  Jalil Heidary Dahooie,et al.  Competency‐based IT personnel selection using a hybrid SWARA and ARAS‐G methodology , 2018 .

[49]  Xiaodong Huang,et al.  Topological configuration analysis and design for foam filled multi-cell tubes , 2018 .