Recognising Fetal Compromise in the Cardiograph during the Antenatal Period: Pearls and Pitfalls

There are several national and international guidelines to aid the interpretation of the cardiotocograph (CTG) trace during labour. These guidelines are based on assessing changes in the fetal heart rate (i.e. cardiograph) in response to mechanical and hypoxic stresses during labour secondary to ongoing frequency, duration and strength of uterine contractions (i.e. tocograph). However, during the antenatal period, uterine contractions are absent, and therefore, these intrapartum CTG guidelines cannot be used to reliably identify fetuses at risk of compromise. Opinion Article Pereira et al.; AJMAH, 18(9): 72-83, 2020; Article no.AJMAH.60725 73 Computerised analysis of CTG using the Dawes-Redman Criteria could be used to detect fetal compromise. However, clinicians should be aware of the multiple pathways of fetal damage (i.e. inflammation, infection, intrauterine fetal stroke, chronic fetal anaemia, acute feto-maternal haemorrhage and fetal cardiac or neurological disorders) which can cause changes on the CTG trace which may not be recognised by using CTG guidelines.

[1]  C. Lees,et al.  ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. , 2020, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[2]  D. Cuadras,et al.  Does the saltatory pattern on cardiotocograph (CTG) trace really exist? The ZigZag pattern as an alternative definition and its correlation with perinatal outcomes , 2019, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[3]  A. Dall'asta,et al.  Intrapartum cardiotocography patterns observed in suspected clinical and subclinical chorioamnionitis in term fetuses , 2019, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[4]  E. Chandraharan,et al.  Recognition of chronic hypoxia and pre‐existing foetal injury on the cardiotocograph (CTG): Urgent need to think beyond the guidelines , 2017, Porto biomedical journal.

[5]  P. Steer Commentary on ‘Antenatal cardiotocogram quality and interpretation using computers’ , 2014, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[6]  E. Ferrazzi,et al.  Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early‐onset fetal growth restriction: cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE) , 2013, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[7]  Edwin Chandraharan,et al.  Use of Continuous Electronic Fetal Monitoring in a Preterm Fetus: Clinical Dilemmas and Recommendations for Practice , 2011, Journal of pregnancy.

[8]  M. Moulden,et al.  Computerized analysis of normal fetal heart rate pattern throughout gestation , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[9]  George A. Macones,et al.  Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles , 2009 .

[10]  Edwin Chandraharan,et al.  Prevention of birth asphyxia: responding appropriately to cardiotocograph (CTG) traces. , 2007, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[11]  D. Tincello,et al.  Computerised analysis of fetal heart rate recordings in maternal type I diabetes mellitus , 2001, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[12]  D. Roberts,et al.  Computerised antenatal fetal heart rate recordings between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation , 2001, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[13]  M. Preti,et al.  Importance of fetal heart rate cycling during the interpretation of the cardiotocograph (CTG) , 2018 .

[14]  E. Chandraharan Handbook of CTG Interpretation: From Patterns to Physiology , 2017 .

[15]  E. Chandraharan,et al.  Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management. , 2016, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[16]  Z. Alfirevic,et al.  Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.