Sustainability indicators: the problem of integration

Sustainability indicators (SIs) are increasingly seen as important tools in the implementation of sustainable development. Numerous suggested SI lists and matrices exist, but a remaining problem is how these diverse SIs are to be integrated into an answer as to whether something is sustainable or not. In some studies of sustainability workers have adopted a quantitative integration approach whereby SIs are given numerical values and integrated mathematically to produce a value for sustainability. In this paper the authors discuss SI integration by drawing upon the results of a six-year research project based in a village in Nigeria. They conclude that an element of'qualitative integration' incorporating value judgements and subjectivity is inevitable with a concept such as sustainability, even if one begins with what may seem like sharp and quantitative SIs. It is argued that SIs are primarily a product of development intervention rather than a desire to understand, and as a result carry with them the desired characteristics, from the donor perspective, of efficiency and accountability. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

[1]  A. Goldman Threats to sustainability in African agriculture: Searching for appropriate paradigms , 1995 .

[2]  J. Guyer Small change: individual farm work and collective life in a western Nigerian savanna town, 1969–88 , 1992, Africa.

[3]  G. Stone “Predatory Sedentism”: Intimidation and Intensification in the Nigerian Savanna , 1997 .

[4]  Zainal Abidin Mohamed,et al.  Creating a farmer sustainability index: a Malaysian case study. , 1993 .

[5]  S. Bell,et al.  Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable? , 1999 .

[6]  Marg Csapo Universal Primary Education in Nigeria: Its Problems and Implications , 1983, African Studies Review.

[7]  Emmanuel Torquebiau,et al.  Are tropical agroforestry home gardens sustainable , 1992 .

[8]  J. Guyer Household and Community in African Studies , 1981, African Studies Review.

[9]  G. Stone Keeping the Home Fires Burning: The Changed Nature of Householding in the Kofyar Homeland , 1998 .

[10]  A. Goldman Pest and Disease Hazards and Sustainability in African Agriculture , 1996, Experimental Agriculture.

[11]  R. Netting,et al.  the sexual division of labor in Kofyar agriculture , 1995 .

[12]  J. Guyer Diversity at different levels: farm and community in western Nigeria , 1996, Africa.

[13]  A. Clayton,et al.  Sustainability: A Systems Approach , 1996 .

[14]  M. J. Swift,et al.  On agricultural sustainability and its measurement in small-scale farming in sub-Saharan Africa☆ , 1994 .

[15]  Cm Penfold,et al.  Biological farming for sustainable agricultural production , 1995 .

[16]  R. Netting,et al.  Agro-diversity on a farming frontier: Kofyar smallholders on the Benue plains of central Nigeria , 1996, Africa.

[17]  Claudio O. Stöckle,et al.  A framework for evaluating the sustainability of agricultural production systems , 1994 .

[18]  Sara Berry,et al.  No Condition Is Permanent: The Social Dynamics of Agrarian Change in Sub-Saharan Africa , 1993 .

[19]  Kofyar Cash-Cropping: Choice and Change in Indigenous Agricultural Development , 1989 .

[20]  R. Netting Smallholders, Householders: Farm Families and the Ecology of Intensive, Sustainable Agriculture , 1994 .

[21]  Glenn Davis Stone,et al.  Seasonality, Labor Scheduling, and Agricultural Intensification in the Nigerian Savanna , 1990 .

[22]  James Hansen,et al.  Is agricultural sustainability a useful concept , 1996 .