Applications of integrated assessment modeling to climate change

Climate change studies are often interdisciplinary by nature, incorporating many domains of science, economics, and political theory. Integrated assessment (IA) aims to bring diverse scientific, economics and social science expertise together to provide analysis and advice that comprehensively addresses all or at least many aspects of the climate change issue. IA methods have been applied to many areas of climate change providing insights into areas such as optimal timing of emission reductions, weighting of different greenhouse gases, or impacts of biofuel policies. Additionally, IAs have identified key uncertainties that should be priorities of future research, such as the need to understand oceanic heat uptake in order to better constrain climate sensitivity and predict future timing of temperature change. These assessments have also served to establish ongoing communication within the community of researchers, and between researchers and policy makers. In complex scientific issues it is often difficult for policy makers and the public to sort out conflicting scientific views, and an authoritative assessment process can provide consensus views on the issue, accepting that in some cases the “consensus” may be that some aspects of the issue remain unresolved. This review explores the history and applications of these IAs, and identifies avenues for future emphasis. We briefly review the whole field of IAs of climate change, but focus on the role of formal computational frameworks in IA models. WIREs Clim Change 2011 2 27–44 DOI: 10.1002/wcc.93 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website

[1]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment , 2010, Nature.

[2]  David Popp,et al.  Entice: Endogenous Technological Change in the Dice Model of Global Warming , 2003 .

[3]  W. Nordhaus.  An Optimal Transition Path for Controlling Greenhouse Gases , 1992, Science.

[4]  Mike Hulme,et al.  Climate change: What do we know about the IPCC? , 2010 .

[5]  Thomas Bruckner,et al.  Methodological Aspects of the Tolerable Windows Approach , 2003 .

[6]  M. Sarofim,et al.  Stabilization and global climate policy , 2005 .

[7]  J. Fuglestvedt,et al.  Alternatives to the Global Warming Potential for Comparing Climate Impacts of Emissions of Greenhouse Gases , 2005 .

[8]  D. Lashof,et al.  Relative contributions of greenhouse gas emissions to global warming , 1990, Nature.

[9]  M Granger Morgan,et al.  Learning from the U.S. National Assessment of Climate Change Impacts. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  M. Sarofim,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis of Climate Change and Policy Response , 2003 .

[11]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  An alternative approach to establishing trade-offs among greenhouse gases , 2001, Nature.

[12]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  Climate, development and malaria: an application of FUND , 2008 .

[13]  Michael D. Mastrandrea,et al.  Integrated assessment of abrupt climatic changes , 2001 .

[14]  Jan Corfee-Morlot,et al.  Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) “reasons for concern” , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Comparing Oceanic Heat Uptake in AOGCM Transient Climate Change Experiments , 2003 .

[16]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Future Effects of Ozone on Carbon Sequestration and Climate Change Policy Using a Global Biogeochemical Model , 2005 .

[17]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C , 2009, Nature.

[18]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations , 1996, Nature.

[19]  W. Nordhaus.  To Slow or Not to Slow: The Economics of the Greenhouse Effect , 1991 .

[20]  R. Tol.  The Social Cost of Carbon: Trends, Outliers and Catastrophes , 2008 .

[21]  William C. Clark,et al.  1 Evaluating the Influence of Global Environmental Assessments 1 , 2006 .

[22]  K. Matsumoto,et al.  Climate and carbon cycle changes under the overshoot scenario , 2008 .

[23]  G. Yohe,et al.  Adaptation and the Guardrail Approach to Tolerable Climate Change , 2000 .

[24]  Frank Lunkeit,et al.  Earth system models of intermediate complexity: closing the gap in the spectrum of climate system models , 2002 .

[25]  E. and,et al.  Integrated assessment models of global climate change , 1997 .

[26]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[27]  M. Tavoni,et al.  A World Induced Technical Change Hybrid Model , 2006 .

[28]  M. Weitzman,et al.  On Modeling and Interpreting the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change , 2009, The Review of Economics and Statistics.