Board Chair Authentic Leadership and Nonexecutives’ Motivation and Commitment

Using data from a sample of 606 nonexecutives sitting on boards of a Canadian credit union, this study tests the relationship between chairs’ authentic leadership on boards and nonexecutives’ motivation and commitment. Hypothesis validation indicates that chairs with an authentic leadership style favor motivation and commitment through the emergence of a participative safety climate based on transparency and idea sharing. This relationship is stronger when executives perceive a high-quality relationship between the chair and the CEO. By integrating the literature on leadership with that on corporate boards, our study offers a deeper understanding of how, and under which circumstances, chairs contribute to nonexecutives’ motivation and commitment on the board.

[1]  Bernard A. Nijstad,et al.  Innovation in top management teams: Minority dissent, transformational leadership, and radical innovations , 2014 .

[2]  Fred O. Walumbwa,et al.  LEADERSHIP IN ACTION TEAMS: TEAM LEADER AND MEMBERS’ AUTHENTICITY, AUTHENTICITY STRENGTH, AND TEAM OUTCOMES , 2011 .

[3]  Dan S. Chiaburu,et al.  Social and economic exchanges with the organization: do leader behaviors matter? , 2011 .

[4]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Effect size measures for mediation models: quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. , 2011, Psychological methods.

[5]  Catherine M. Dalton,et al.  Integration of Micro and Macro Studies in Governance Research: CEO Duality, Board Composition, and Financial Performance , 2011 .

[6]  Fred Luthans,et al.  : Authentically leading groups: The mediating role of collective psychological capital and trust , 2011 .

[7]  A. Kakabadse,et al.  The chemistry factor in the Chairman/CEO relationship , 2010 .

[8]  Adela J. McMurray,et al.  Leadership, climate, psychological capital, commitment, and wellbeing in a non‐profit organization , 2010 .

[9]  V. Dulewicz,et al.  Inside the “black box”: the performance of boards of directors of unlisted companies , 2010 .

[10]  S. Korek,et al.  Transformational leadership and commitment: A multilevel analysis of group-level influences and mediating processes , 2010 .

[11]  Adegoke Oke,et al.  Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: a cross-level investigation. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  Francesca Cuomo,et al.  How Independent, Competent and Incentivized Should Non-Executive Directors Be? An Empirical Investigation of Good Governance Codes , 2010 .

[13]  K. W. Mossholder,et al.  Examining the effects of trust in leaders: A bases-and-foci approach☆ , 2010 .

[14]  Adam M. Grant,et al.  Mission possible? The performance of prosocially motivated employees depends on manager trustworthiness. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  J. G. Hunt,et al.  Emotional labor and leadership: A threat to authenticity? , 2009 .

[16]  G. Tyge Payne,et al.  Corporate Board Attributes, Team Effectiveness and Financial Performance , 2009 .

[17]  James B. Avey,et al.  Authentic Leadership and Positive Psychological Capital , 2009 .

[18]  Alessandro Minichilli,et al.  Making Boards Effective: An Empirical Examination of Board Task Performance , 2009 .

[19]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Authentic leadership and positive organizational behavior: A meso, multi-level perspective , 2008 .

[20]  J. Bicksler The subprime mortgage debacle and its linkages to corporate governance , 2008 .

[21]  Gül Selin Erben,et al.  The Relationship Between Paternalistic Leadership and Organizational Commitment: Investigating the Role of Climate Regarding Ethics , 2008 .

[22]  D. van Knippenberg,et al.  Transformational leadership and team innovation: integrating team climate principles. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[24]  Joseph C. Santora,et al.  Building a Climate for Innovation Through Transformational Leadership and Organizational Culture , 2008 .

[25]  Fred O. Walumbwa,et al.  Authentic Leadership: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Measure† , 2008 .

[26]  Adam M. Grant Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  Catherine M. Dalton,et al.  1 The Fundamental Agency Problem and Its Mitigation: Independence, Equity, and the Market for Corporate Control , 2007 .

[28]  What Makes an Outstanding Chairman? Findings from the UK Non-Executive Director of the Year Awards, 2006 , 2007 .

[29]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.

[30]  Beverly Behan,et al.  What makes a great board chair? , 2007, Trustee : the journal for hospital governing boards.

[31]  J. Edwards,et al.  Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. , 2007, Psychological methods.

[32]  Jonas Gabrielsson,et al.  Understanding the leadership role of the board chairperson through a team production approach , 2007 .

[33]  Clyde A. Hamstreet Board and Cooperative Leadership That Invites Investment , 2006 .

[34]  A. Kakabadse,et al.  Chairman and chief executive officer (CEO): that sacred and secret relationship , 2006 .

[35]  Richard W. Leblanc Assessing Board Leadership , 2005 .

[36]  Bruce J. Avolio,et al.  “Can you see the real me?” A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development , 2005 .

[37]  B. Avolio,et al.  . , 2005, The Leadership Quarterly.

[38]  F. Morgeson,et al.  Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader-follower outcomes , 2005 .

[39]  E. Deci,et al.  Self‐determination theory and work motivation , 2005 .

[40]  Philip Stiles,et al.  Beyond Agency Conceptions of the Work of the Non-Executive Director: Creating Accountability in the Boardroom , 2005 .

[41]  S. Hannah,et al.  Moral leadership: Explicating the moral component of authentic leadership , 2005 .

[42]  Fred O. Walumbwa,et al.  Unlocking the mask: a look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors , 2004 .

[43]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[44]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[45]  Richard P. DeShon,et al.  Climate perceptions matter: a meta-analytic path analysis relating molar climate, cognitive and affective states, and individual level work outcomes. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[46]  Albert A. Cannella,et al.  Corporate Governance: Decades of Dialogue and Data , 2003 .

[47]  John P. Meyer,et al.  AFFECTIVE, CONTINUANCE, AND NORMATIVE COMMITMENT TO THE ORGANIZATION: A META-ANALYSIS OF ANTECEDENTS, CORRELATES, AND CONSEQUENCES , 2002 .

[48]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[49]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[50]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision making groups , 1999 .

[51]  N. Vafeas Board meeting frequency and firm performance , 1999 .

[52]  M. Kivimäki,et al.  A short version of the Team Climate inventory : Development and psychometric properties , 1999 .

[53]  Philip Stiles,et al.  The Relationship between Chairmen and ChiefExecutives: Competitive or Complementary Roles? , 1999 .

[54]  N. Anderson,et al.  Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory , 1998 .

[55]  A. Pettigrew,et al.  Control and Creativity in the Boardroom , 1998 .

[56]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application , 1997 .

[57]  J. H. Davis,et al.  TOWARD A STEWARDSHIP THEORY OF MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[58]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Who Shall Succeed? How CEO/Board Preferences and Power Affect the Choice of New CEOs , 1996 .

[59]  G. Spreitzer PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND VALIDATION , 1995 .

[60]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  Power and Influence in and Around the Boardroom , 1995 .

[61]  D. R. Dalton,et al.  Bankruptcy and Corporate Governance: The Impact of Board Composition and Structure , 1994 .

[62]  E. Deci,et al.  Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective. , 1994, Journal of personality.

[63]  Edward E. Lawler,et al.  Total quality-oriented human resources management , 1992 .

[64]  John P. Meyer,et al.  A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment , 1991 .

[65]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  The relative power of ceos and boards of directors: Associations with corporate performance , 1991 .

[66]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[67]  K. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation , 1990 .

[68]  M. West,et al.  Innovation at work. , 1990 .

[69]  Michael A. West,et al.  The social psychology of innovation in groups. , 1990 .

[70]  K. Eisenhardt Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[71]  William S. Peters,et al.  Form, effect size and power in moderated regression analysis , 1987 .

[72]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[73]  Arnon E. Reichers,et al.  On the Etiology of Climates. , 1983 .

[74]  R. Kanter The Change Masters , 1983 .

[75]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[76]  B. Schneider,et al.  INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE II: MEASUREMENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE BY THE MULTI-TRAIT, MULTI-RATER MATRIX , 1970 .