Active or passive?: Investigating the impact of robot role in meetings

Meetings are an integral part of the work place and society in general. Research in Computer Supported Cooperative Work attempts to facilitate and make the process of meetings more effective. Our vision is that the incorporation of social robots in such human-human collaborative settings can assist and improve the effectiveness of a meeting. In this paper we present an empirical study in which pairs of participants collaborate in a meeting scenario with a Nao humanoid robot. Using a within-subjects design, we manipulated the robot's role within the meeting as being either “active” versus “passive”/“service-oriented”. Our results show that the more active robot was deemed as more more alive and social, had the participants more emotionally involved and caused more verbal engagement from the participants as compared to a passive service robot. In conclusion, we speculate on the inclusion of a collaborative robot as a meeting partner.

[1]  Hendrik Van Brussel,et al.  A Robotic Assistant for Ambient Intelligent Meeting Rooms , 2003, EUSAI.

[2]  Anton Nijholt,et al.  Mixed reality participants in smart meeting rooms and smart home environments , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[3]  K. M. Lee,et al.  Can robots manifest personality? : An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction , 2006 .

[4]  Joonhwan Lee,et al.  Ubi-Jector: an information-sharing screen in a casual meeting environment using mobile devices , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[5]  Tobias Greitemeyer,et al.  Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: What everyday people think robots should do , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[7]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  "Social" robots are psychological agents for infants: A test of gaze following , 2010, Neural Networks.

[8]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Helper agent: designing an assistant for human-human interaction in a virtual meeting space , 2000, CHI.

[9]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[10]  Hiroshi G. Okuno,et al.  A robot referee for rock-paper-scissors sound games , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Anton Nijholt,et al.  Meetings and Meeting Support in Ambient Intelligence , 2006 .

[12]  Claudia Diamantini,et al.  Special Issue on Advances in Computer Supported Collaboration: Systems and Technologies , 2014, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[13]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[14]  Michal Jacovi,et al.  The chasms of CSCW: a citation graph analysis of the CSCW conference , 2006, CSCW '06.

[15]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Effect of a robot on user perceptions , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[16]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Reflect: An Interactive Table for Regulating Face-to-Face Collaborative Learning , 2008, EC-TEL.

[17]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Honest Signals in the Recognition of Functional Relational Roles in Meetings , 2009, AAAI Spring Symposium: Human Behavior Modeling.

[18]  Thomas Visser,et al.  The Effects Visual Feedback on Social Behavior during Decision Making Meetings , 2011, HCI.

[19]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  Which Robot Behavior Can Motivate Children to Tidy up Their Toys? Design and Evaluation of “Ranger” , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[20]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  What is a robot companion - friend, assistant or butler? , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[21]  Karrie Karahalios,et al.  A3: HCI Coding Guideline for Research Using Video Annotation to Assess Behavior of Nonverbal Subjects with Computer-Based Intervention , 2009, TACC.

[22]  Yves Lespérance,et al.  An Intelligent Assistant for Computer-Aided Design Extended Abstract , 2000 .

[23]  Tetsunori Kobayashi,et al.  Multi-person conversation via multi-modal interface - a robot who communicate with multi-user - , 1999, EUROSPEECH.

[24]  Armando Fox,et al.  The Interactive Workspaces Project: Experiences with Ubiquitous Computing Rooms , 2002, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[25]  Anton Nijholt,et al.  Addressee Identification in Face-to-Face Meetings , 2006, EACL.

[26]  I. René J. A. te Boekhorst,et al.  Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion , 2008, Auton. Robots.

[27]  Wenfeng Li,et al.  A framework for computer supported cooperative work in design with robots , 2005, Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, 2005..

[28]  Jens Edlund,et al.  Analysis of gaze and speech patterns in three-party quiz game interaction , 2013, INTERSPEECH.

[29]  Melissa M. Franks,et al.  Camera-Related Behaviors during Video Recorded Medical Interactions , 2007 .

[30]  Anton Nijholt,et al.  Pro-active meeting assistants: attention please! , 2007, AI & SOCIETY.

[31]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Taxonomy and Theory in Computer Supported Cooperative Work , 2012 .

[32]  Philippe A. Palanque,et al.  Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 2014, International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

[33]  Anthony Collins,et al.  Who did what? Who said that?: Collaid: an environment for capturing traces of collaborative learning at the tabletop , 2011, ITS '11.

[34]  Marc Hanheide,et al.  Evaluating extrovert and introvert behaviour of a domestic robot — a video study , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[35]  S. R. Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. , 1986 .

[36]  Tetsunori Kobayashi,et al.  Modeling of conversational strategy for the robot participating in the group conversation , 2001, INTERSPEECH.

[37]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Human-Robot Interaction: A Survey , 2008, Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact..

[38]  M. Brandon,et al.  Effect personality matching on robot acceptance : effect of robot-user personality matching on the acceptance of domestic assistant robots for elderly , 2012 .